Three generations of women in a Mexican American family experience sexual awakenings over the course of a summer.Three generations of women in a Mexican American family experience sexual awakenings over the course of a summer.Three generations of women in a Mexican American family experience sexual awakenings over the course of a summer.
- Director
- Writer
- Stars
- Awards
- 5 wins & 2 nominations total
Roman Arabia
- Oswaldo
- (as Victor Wolf)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
We saw this film at Sundance, and looked forward to seeing it as it was filmed in our favorite state! The idea of the story is a good one, and there were many scenes that worked well. However, some editing is needed here. The movie is much too long (over 2 hours) and parts of it just dragged by. The filmmaker had lots to say, but much of what was said in the movie could have easily been shown in a much shorter version. Many scenes went on and on when we got the idea in the first few seconds. The dialog was stilted and unnatural in several scenes, which was distracting. There were some side stories that were completely unnecessary to the main idea of the film. However, the performances by the 3 lead actresses were wonderful, and the three of them make this movie worth watching.
*note* I see that I am in the "hated it" category for reviews. I didn't hate the movie, I just thought it was a bit flawed.
*note* I see that I am in the "hated it" category for reviews. I didn't hate the movie, I just thought it was a bit flawed.
ArizWildcat has the exact right idea! (and not just because I also went to the U of A!) I work in the town where this was filmed and set...and it's not a desolate as the movie depicts. The movie needs some serious editing...too many artsy languid shots. The story is OK...some funny parts, although I don't know if they were intended to be funny. Some of the scenes could have been shorter (a certain bathtub scene, for one!) It is not rated, as of yet, but it is NOT for children. With a good editor, this could be a better movie. One shot which started wide and SLOWLY zoomed in to close up was somewhat jerky. I was aware of the zoom in slow, jerking movement, rather than being a slowly fluid zoom. I'm not a filmmaker, but it looked like the amateurish job I would have done with my camcorder! Of course, I may be nitpicking, but those are the things I noticed.
First off, after speaking to the director at the night of the Latin Film Festival here in New York, I would like to again commend her for a job well done. I am also a first time director so I definitely correlated to a lot of the jerky camera movements and experimental camera shots that were probably theorized but never executed to their fullest extent. There were also some doubtful moments with audio at times; however, having discussed these decisions with her personally I came to an understanding as to why they were done. This of course does not take away from the obvious, the film did drag, and it definitely needs some severe editing adjustments. The three raunchy sex scenes were left on screen for a reason, not only to try something new, but to give the audience a feel for a real life situation that women face in an every day environment. The scenes can be shortened however and still give the audience the same feel. The length they are at now makes the scenes disturbing and deteriorates from the comedic undertone that was originally intended by the director. There are many other comedic ploys executed that trick the audience into thinking something evident is about to happen, when it really doesn't. These techniques keep the audience in a(n) intriguing suspense, but you can only have our attention for so long.
I also agree with Tmvaz-1 and Wildcat. This film is terrible. I know it has been to Sundance, but why i do not know. I give credit and my three votes for the three lead actresses. They are phenomenal and the filmmakers should thank their graces that they have good performances cause without that, this film doesn't have anything. It is over 2 hours...feels like 4 and has some graphic scenes that are NOT necessary. The shots are very long and boring. My guess is they didn't get good coverage. As Wildcat and Tmvaz were saying, the shots weren't that great so i'm guessing it was poorly planned. Also, for some reason the people in the scene were always on like the far left of the screen...why? This film builds up to like 4 funny moments in the film and each moment has like a 30 minute build up. The grandmother is a fantastic actress and completely makes this movie bearable along with her two co-stars, but the story is incredibly boring and the movie is really just about sex. It really is a poorly told story. Maybe if it was like 45 minutes shorter, it would seem like a better movie.
I finally rented this over the Christmas holiday. Like some of the other reviewers, I too am from the same small town where this film is set. When I came across this film at the video store, I thought it would be interesting to see Somerton on the big screen (or my flat screen). What I found instead, was a frighteningly accurate depiction of life in this small town. Not only does the film artistically capture three generations of beautiful, strong women, it also captures the soul of a small agriculturally based Latino town. The audio was a little interesting at first, but it really adds to the beauty of this film... To all who made this film a possibility, You don't make me want to live there ever again, but you did Somerton proud!!!
Did you know
- TriviaFinal film of Lucy Gallardo.
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Languages
- Also known as
- Secretos de verano
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Gross US & Canada
- $215,303
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $91,432
- May 18, 2008
- Gross worldwide
- $215,303
- Runtime
- 2h 8m(128 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 2.35 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content