IMDb RATING
6.0/10
4.5K
YOUR RATING
On his request, the sensitive sister of a real estate agent visits a house he intends to sell, only to cross paths with its resident curse.On his request, the sensitive sister of a real estate agent visits a house he intends to sell, only to cross paths with its resident curse.On his request, the sensitive sister of a real estate agent visits a house he intends to sell, only to cross paths with its resident curse.
Kaei Okina
- Hiroshi Kitada (segment "Tatsuya")
- (as Kaei Ô)
Duncan
- Haitatsuin (segment "Tatsuya")
- (as Dankan)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
"Ju-On 2" isn't definitely as good as the original.It's very bland and boring film with some occasionally scary moments."Ju-On 2" starts at the beginning of the first film,re-telling the story that started it all in the original "Ju-On",and then about half way into the film the new story picks up.The film offers some downright creepy moments,but there is not enough creepiness for my liking.There is also one scene obviously stolen from Hideo Nakata's horror hit "Ringu"(1998).So if you liked the first film you may be a bit a disappointed with this one.My rating:6 out of 10-and that's being generous.Stick with brilliant original.
I have not seen the original film, so I can't make any comparison. Supposedly this "sequel" contains 40 minutes of the original and just 36 minutes of new material.
No matter to me, as this is one of the creepiest films I have seen. I was literally jumping out of my seat at times. The mother and child really creeped me out. People dying all over the place due to some curse that resulted from a murder by a father.
Creepy music, and some bizarre deaths make this an interesting movie. The non-linear style may put some off, but I really enjoyed it.
There are apparently four of these films, so I will be looking for them all. Of course, I can also check out the American remakes which feature the mother (Takako Fuji) and the father (Takashi Matsuyama).
No matter to me, as this is one of the creepiest films I have seen. I was literally jumping out of my seat at times. The mother and child really creeped me out. People dying all over the place due to some curse that resulted from a murder by a father.
Creepy music, and some bizarre deaths make this an interesting movie. The non-linear style may put some off, but I really enjoyed it.
There are apparently four of these films, so I will be looking for them all. Of course, I can also check out the American remakes which feature the mother (Takako Fuji) and the father (Takashi Matsuyama).
The first TV movie of Ju-on is one of the creepiest movies I've I've seen. This is considerably less so.
This film begins with a half an hour of material from the first film. While its good, it slows the forward momentum of this film especially if you watched the previous film in close order.
When the new material comes it picks up literally where the first leaves off and follows it to a new end. Some of this is good, but much, like the end, is good looking but rather confused and far from scary. Worse, the now linear story is too literal and doesn't leave enough to the mind.
If you need to know what happens after the first film ends, then by all means pick this up for viewing, however if it were up to me I'd just leave the first film be and forget this as a well intentioned mistake.
5 out of 10
This film begins with a half an hour of material from the first film. While its good, it slows the forward momentum of this film especially if you watched the previous film in close order.
When the new material comes it picks up literally where the first leaves off and follows it to a new end. Some of this is good, but much, like the end, is good looking but rather confused and far from scary. Worse, the now linear story is too literal and doesn't leave enough to the mind.
If you need to know what happens after the first film ends, then by all means pick this up for viewing, however if it were up to me I'd just leave the first film be and forget this as a well intentioned mistake.
5 out of 10
A sequel that takes and incorporates the best concepts from its predecessor, adding other stories to complement its entire narrative, which can divide opinions.
"Ju-on: The Curse 2" is a movie that revisits its original concept, but in a graphic manner, once again capturing many of the images from the previous installment, where emphasis is placed on more crucial, impactful, or outstanding moments. "The Curse 2" is a film that revisits its original concept, but in a graphic manner, once again capturing many of the images from the previous installment, where emphasis is placed on more crucial, impactful, or outstanding moments. All of this with the aim of providing new perspectives that foster the overall growth of the narrative. It is a somewhat debatable decision because from a technical standpoint, time is wasted building new ideas that could match or even surpass what was seen in the first installment. On the other hand, reinforcing that impact again to give more connection with the new elements observed in the movie and thus providing the viewer with a refreshing sequence and a more coherent follow-up with each new approach.
The director and screenwriter Takashi Shimizu implemented this concept with the aim of addressing a main line to be able to see the importance or chaos that is caused thru the most impactful moments of the story, with the objective that the viewer keeps in mind the consequences over time and that focus on the curse. Now then, can this be debatable? Totally, because the mere fact of having 30 minutes of the same footage again, with the same concept or something more predominant, is an indication that the ideas were falling short or that there simply wasn't anything beyond that could engage the consumers. It's as if it were intentional to capture the viewer's attention again. Moreover, that approach divides the critics significantly.
In addition to that, it is a point full of controversy because the new additions can feel somewhat rushed, with few layers of interpretation or simply not up to the standards of those seen in the previous installment. The final result of the movie speaks for itself and is undeniably entertaining, but without a doubt, it lacked much more. This sequel is a sequence of unadded footage that seems to have been left out of the first work or were scenes shot with those ideas on the go that ultimately came together to provide a second part.
With the aforementioned, I wouldn't want to give the impression that the sequel is bad, because it's not; it has its merits and meets its objective. In fact, it is a coherent and understandable sequel given the background of its production, but it should be noted that it is not better than its predecessor. Even so, it is good to have a bit more information, and that is appreciated.
The musical score, the sounds, the costumes, the staging, the makeup, and other cinematic aspects are once again decent, simple, but very much in line with the esthetic of this horror film. The script, despite having the aforementioned actions, has its logic and main focus. It's all a matter of expectation and interpretation, however, it's debatable.
"Ju-on: The Curse 2" once again takes up those reflective messages about trauma, the loss of loved ones, mourning, despair, fear, double personalities, murders, disbelief from security entities, family ties, desperation, and how many families live with supernatural themes. "The Curse 2" once again revisits those reflective messages about trauma, the loss of loved ones, mourning, despair, fear, split personalities, murders, disbelief from security entities, family ties, desperation, and how many families live with supernatural themes. Once again, the metaphor of how anger and revenge become curses is established, greatly affecting people in an environment and gaining momentum over time. On the other hand, the concept of the house escalates even further, knowing that it can be considered the epicenter of evil and curses themselves, drawing a parallel with external problems and the consequences they bring, providing a focus on reproduction in many households and that it may be more common than we believe. It is a window to analyze the limits of the human being in the face of personal problems, revenge, anger, cruelty, and those negative aspects that abound in the minds of many people.
In summary, it is a sequel of just 70 minutes that wastes the addition of other ideas that could have made an impact; however, it fulfills its entertainment objective and slightly expands the lore of this saga. The movie could undoubtedly have been better, and it doesn't mean it's bad; it just lacked something more to be almost on the same level as its predecessor.
5.5/10.
"Ju-on: The Curse 2" is a movie that revisits its original concept, but in a graphic manner, once again capturing many of the images from the previous installment, where emphasis is placed on more crucial, impactful, or outstanding moments. "The Curse 2" is a film that revisits its original concept, but in a graphic manner, once again capturing many of the images from the previous installment, where emphasis is placed on more crucial, impactful, or outstanding moments. All of this with the aim of providing new perspectives that foster the overall growth of the narrative. It is a somewhat debatable decision because from a technical standpoint, time is wasted building new ideas that could match or even surpass what was seen in the first installment. On the other hand, reinforcing that impact again to give more connection with the new elements observed in the movie and thus providing the viewer with a refreshing sequence and a more coherent follow-up with each new approach.
The director and screenwriter Takashi Shimizu implemented this concept with the aim of addressing a main line to be able to see the importance or chaos that is caused thru the most impactful moments of the story, with the objective that the viewer keeps in mind the consequences over time and that focus on the curse. Now then, can this be debatable? Totally, because the mere fact of having 30 minutes of the same footage again, with the same concept or something more predominant, is an indication that the ideas were falling short or that there simply wasn't anything beyond that could engage the consumers. It's as if it were intentional to capture the viewer's attention again. Moreover, that approach divides the critics significantly.
In addition to that, it is a point full of controversy because the new additions can feel somewhat rushed, with few layers of interpretation or simply not up to the standards of those seen in the previous installment. The final result of the movie speaks for itself and is undeniably entertaining, but without a doubt, it lacked much more. This sequel is a sequence of unadded footage that seems to have been left out of the first work or were scenes shot with those ideas on the go that ultimately came together to provide a second part.
With the aforementioned, I wouldn't want to give the impression that the sequel is bad, because it's not; it has its merits and meets its objective. In fact, it is a coherent and understandable sequel given the background of its production, but it should be noted that it is not better than its predecessor. Even so, it is good to have a bit more information, and that is appreciated.
The musical score, the sounds, the costumes, the staging, the makeup, and other cinematic aspects are once again decent, simple, but very much in line with the esthetic of this horror film. The script, despite having the aforementioned actions, has its logic and main focus. It's all a matter of expectation and interpretation, however, it's debatable.
"Ju-on: The Curse 2" once again takes up those reflective messages about trauma, the loss of loved ones, mourning, despair, fear, double personalities, murders, disbelief from security entities, family ties, desperation, and how many families live with supernatural themes. "The Curse 2" once again revisits those reflective messages about trauma, the loss of loved ones, mourning, despair, fear, split personalities, murders, disbelief from security entities, family ties, desperation, and how many families live with supernatural themes. Once again, the metaphor of how anger and revenge become curses is established, greatly affecting people in an environment and gaining momentum over time. On the other hand, the concept of the house escalates even further, knowing that it can be considered the epicenter of evil and curses themselves, drawing a parallel with external problems and the consequences they bring, providing a focus on reproduction in many households and that it may be more common than we believe. It is a window to analyze the limits of the human being in the face of personal problems, revenge, anger, cruelty, and those negative aspects that abound in the minds of many people.
In summary, it is a sequel of just 70 minutes that wastes the addition of other ideas that could have made an impact; however, it fulfills its entertainment objective and slightly expands the lore of this saga. The movie could undoubtedly have been better, and it doesn't mean it's bad; it just lacked something more to be almost on the same level as its predecessor.
5.5/10.
Continuing the story of its predecessor, "Ju-on 2" (2000) maintains the quality of the first film, but disappoints due to technical issues and questionable compositional choices.
The film inherits all the strengths and weaknesses of the first film, but fails to structure the productions as separate titles. The film features an unnecessary 30-minute recap of the previous film, resulting in a cut of almost half the total running time. The decision to develop the video as separate titles hinders the enjoyment of the plot, making it an ill-advised decision. In addition to the recap, the film features unimpressive scenes and CGI effects that have aged poorly, factors that compromise the final result. Overall, the production maintains the quality of its predecessor in terms of the heavy atmosphere, the simple yet effective plot, the dry cinematography, among other elements. As in "Ju-on" (2000), the abrupt ending may disturb audiences unfamiliar with J-Horror works of the era. The video would make more sense if it comprised the last minutes of the previous film, without the need for a continuation in another title, this being the notable error that permeates the work from beginning to end.
Despite the unconventional decisions in the composition and distribution of the project, "Ju-on 2" does not disappoint if interpreted as the final minutes of its predecessor.
The film inherits all the strengths and weaknesses of the first film, but fails to structure the productions as separate titles. The film features an unnecessary 30-minute recap of the previous film, resulting in a cut of almost half the total running time. The decision to develop the video as separate titles hinders the enjoyment of the plot, making it an ill-advised decision. In addition to the recap, the film features unimpressive scenes and CGI effects that have aged poorly, factors that compromise the final result. Overall, the production maintains the quality of its predecessor in terms of the heavy atmosphere, the simple yet effective plot, the dry cinematography, among other elements. As in "Ju-on" (2000), the abrupt ending may disturb audiences unfamiliar with J-Horror works of the era. The video would make more sense if it comprised the last minutes of the previous film, without the need for a continuation in another title, this being the notable error that permeates the work from beginning to end.
Despite the unconventional decisions in the composition and distribution of the project, "Ju-on 2" does not disappoint if interpreted as the final minutes of its predecessor.
Did you know
- TriviaThe opening 30 minutes of the film is simply a recap of the first film Ju-on (2000).
- ConnectionsEdited from Ju-on: The Curse (2000)
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Прокляття 2
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Gross worldwide
- $196,200
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content