Tales from Earthsea

Watching Tales from Earthsea, I felt like I had been dropped off in the middle of a book series with no real context as to what was going on. I enjoyed the beautiful animation and ended up finding interest in the story and characters, but at the end of the film I still felt like I was missing something. Studio Ghibli probably should have set this one up better.

Eh, let's just call Tales from Earthsea a case of growing pains for Goro Miyazaki. 

It's not a bad movie. It's just unremarkable in every way. It doesn't have the creativity, emotional depth, or beauty of Spirited Away, the visual wonder of Howl's Moving Castle, the scope of adventure of Castle in the Sky, the lovable characters of Kiki's Delivery Service, or the sheer delight and fun of Ponyo. 

If I had to choose a defining feature for Earthsea, I honestly don't know what it would be. The music is fine, but nothing extraordinary. The character designs and artwork are dangerously close to generic, the story lacks tension and feels almost inconsequential, and the writing is bland. Where's the heart? Where's the humor, the passion, or something that would draw me into the narrative?

I found myself not caring much about what was happening, and more concerned with how much time was left until the movie was over, than anything else. My  expectations for Studio Ghibli are far too high to embrace a movie like this that barely scrapes above mediocrity, and from what I've heard from fans of the Earthsea literature, this isn't the adaptation they were hoping for, either.

Some argue that "Tales from Earthsea" only works if you're not a fan of the novels. I argue the opposite. Studio Ghibli and Goro Miyazaki took on a Herculean effort, creating a massive love letter to Ursula K. Le Guin's beloved series. They approached this film as if it were their only chance to make an Earthsea movie, leading to a final product that, while beautiful, suffers from trying to do too much.

The film struggles to find its footing, with many plot points never receiving the resolution they deserve. This results in a narrative that only makes full sense if you're already familiar with the Earthsea series. For fans like myself, this makes the movie work better as an adaptation of "The Farthest Shore." We see characters from other books making appearances, adding to the richness of the experience. However, for those unfamiliar with Earthsea, understanding the importance of the events and characters can be challenging.

A major disappointment is Sparrowhawk, who feels like a corked bottle throughout the movie. The books make it clear just how powerful and wise he is, akin to Gandalf in "The Lord of the Rings." Unfortunately, the film fails to convey this, depriving the audience of a true sense of his greatness.

Despite these criticisms, I still give "Tales from Earthsea" a 7 out of 10. The animation is stellar, capturing the dark fantasy essence of Earthsea while maintaining Studio Ghibli's recognizable style. It's perhaps the least Studio Ghibli-like film of them all, with its violence and dark tones. The voice performances, especially Willem Dafoe as Cob, are astounding.

The story, though messy, is interesting, and the world-building is incredible. There's a strong commentary on nature and man's greed, a typical Studio Ghibli theme. It's a shame the film didn't achieve the seamless finish it deserved because the potential for an incredible adaptation was there.

In conclusion, "Tales from Earthsea" is a flawed but fascinating film. It stumbles over itself and can't quite find what it truly could have been, caught between a bunch of crossroads. Nevertheless, it remains a beautiful, albeit messy, love letter to Earthsea that I appreciate as a fan of the series.

I am a great fan of the LeGuin books, and when I learned that Studio Ghibli was going to be involved in making of the film I eagerly looked forward to its release. I hoped it would make up for the awful SciFi Channel-aired film. The good news in this outing is, there is genuine respect for the source material, even if it is not done genuine honor.

The plot of the film is an amalgamation of elements of several of the Earthsea books, creating a new villain and having characters interact that indeed barely met in the books. While I could not help but feel disappointed by these changes, the film is still visually enjoyable to behold. It does not compare as favorably to Howl's Moving Castle, a story drastically altered from its own source material that still manages to stand on its own as a story.

I could not help but think, as I watched the character Arren develop, why? Why, when there is such wonderful source material, that his introduction came across so muddled and poorly reasoned. I viewed the film with someone who had never read the books, and she really enjoyed it. Despite the film's shortcomings, you generally care for the cast by the end.

Better than I expected, a fantastic debut from Goro Miyazaki (son of Hayao Miyazaki) and a worthy addition to Ghibli's consistently brilliant catalog. It follows the prince Arren, as he runs from his kingdom and encounters a wizard named Ged. From here, he is drawn into a classic good versus evil battle. Goro Miyazaki's film bares a lot of similarities to his father's films, but lacks some of the whimsical nature that makes Hayao's movies so distinct. Tales from Earthsea is a more subdued film than films such as Spirited Away and Porco Rosso, and doesn't really hit the emotional or imaginative heights that Hayao Miyazaki's films do. But this isn't always a bad thing - It's simply Goro's style, and this element makes his film a more traditional, perhaps more sensible narrative. Goro has taken a somewhat conservative route with this film - visually and audibly it's classic Ghibli, full of lush environments and excellent animation. In terms of narrative, it carries classic Ghibli (particularly Miyazaki) hallmarks - epic battles of good and evil, cathartic journeys, and the hospitality and grace of ordinary people - but it also has more of a traditional narrative. Good and evil are, unlike many his father's films, clearly defined, and the events of the film lack the extravagance (and imagination) of Hayao's films. It's a wise move - rather than try to re-invent the wheel, Goro has made a wonderfully solid and cohesive film.

To simply compare Goro Miyazaki (and his film) to his father is unfair and sells a great movie short - he has obviously inherited a tremendous flair for storytelling, and with Ghibli's animation team behind him, has created a fantastic debut film. There's another Miyazaki in town - and i can't wait to see where he goes next.