A co-ed claims that two fraternity brothers raped her at a Halloween party, but finding the truth proves to be difficult when other members of the fraternity stonewall investigators and the ... Read allA co-ed claims that two fraternity brothers raped her at a Halloween party, but finding the truth proves to be difficult when other members of the fraternity stonewall investigators and the woman's sexual history is revealed.A co-ed claims that two fraternity brothers raped her at a Halloween party, but finding the truth proves to be difficult when other members of the fraternity stonewall investigators and the woman's sexual history is revealed.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
"Out of Control" has one of the more difficult cases of Season 2, with it revolving agreed around an easy case to make albeit very hard to prove and a kind of crime that is one of the most controversial of all crimes. It does admirably if not completely skillfully with a subject that was controversial back then, still is and always has been. If "Out of Control" connected more emotionally with me and was more distinct, it would have been even better than the solid and intriguing episode it still was.
There is a lot to like about "Out of Control". Not surprising considering that there tends to be a lot to like about every 'Law and Order' episode, old and new (prefer the older ones personally myself despite the later ones tending to air more). The production values are slick as usual and the music never gets over-melodramatic or intrusive.
Much of 'Law and Order', well certainly its prime years, was intelligently written and provoked a lot of thought, and "Out of Control" is no exception. Stone's dialogue is juicy as usual and the courtroom scenes leave one glued to the seat. There are enough interesting moments in the story and it is a subject handled with tact at least. The acting is very good, Michael Moriarty as is often the case the standout of the regulars and Noelle Parker gives a deeply felt performance as an interesting character who you are not sure whether you believe or not.
For all those great things, "Out of Control" is a bit ordinary and doesn't have an awful lot new. It's a familiar subject executed in an intriguing and intelligent but also familiar fashion. It could have done with more complexity, rather than being an at times he said she said sort of case, and more twists, with the outcome not to me a massive surprise.
Would have liked to have connected more emotionally, certainly felt a lot of anger especially at the outcome of the trial. But emotionally, for me that was the only emotion felt. The investigative elements are done well and thoughtful, if somewhat nothing out of the ordinary.
Overall, not a bad episode at all. It just felt like something was missing. 7/10
Did you know
- TriviaThis episode appears to be based on the 1990 St. John's University lacrosse case. The case involved allegations of sexual assault against several members of the men's lacrosse team. On March 1, 1990, a 21-year-old African American female student reported that she was sexually assaulted by six white male students, including five lacrosse players, at an off-campus house in Jamaica, Queens. She stated that after being given an alcoholic drink, she became semi-conscious and was assaulted at two different locations. The case garnered significant media attention and sparked debates on race, consent, and campus culture. During the trial, one student, Thomas Dean, pleaded guilty to second-degree sexual abuse and testified against the others. The remaining defendants were acquitted of all charges, with the jury citing inconsistencies in the victim's testimony and questions about consent. Despite the acquittals, a university disciplinary committee recommended the expulsion of three students involved, citing conduct unsuitable for members of the university community.
- GoofsThe boys charged with raping the victim file a civil suit against her for defamation of character and false allegations. The only way a person charged with a crime could sue the alleged victim of their crime for defamation of character is if the victim had been slandering them in the media or other public forum, which she hasn't been; simply accusing someone of a crime can't result in a civil suit until the criminal case has been concluded. Which ties into the second part of the civil suit, a civil suit for false allegations could only be filed after the conclusion of the criminal case if the defendant was acquitted.
- Quotes
Betsy Rawls: [to Logan and Cerreta] Do they give you guys insensitivity seminars? No woman asks to be raped.




