In Washington, D.C., a reporter faces a possible jail sentence for outing a CIA agent and refusing to reveal her source.In Washington, D.C., a reporter faces a possible jail sentence for outing a CIA agent and refusing to reveal her source.In Washington, D.C., a reporter faces a possible jail sentence for outing a CIA agent and refusing to reveal her source.
- Awards
- 2 wins & 2 nominations total
Angelica Page
- Molly Meyers
- (as Angelica Torn)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
7.141.3K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
A powerful film...
I first heard about this film because of Matt Dillon, one of my favourite actors. He is the second billing in this film, right behind Kate Beckinsale, also starring Vera Farmiga, Alan Alda, Angela Bassett, and David Schwimmer.
The film is about Rachel Armstrong, a reporter (Beckinsale) who has written the story of her life: a military coup by the United States on a South American country was a lie, a Watergate, an operation that could get a president impeached. One CIA agent (Farmiga) had been there before the attack and had reported that there was no need to attack. They attacked anyway, and through a number of sources, Armstrong succeeds in finding the story. When the paper hits, the government realizes that they must find out the original source of Armstrong. Hired to find out this story is Patton Dupois (Matt Dillon), who goes after Armstrong with a ruthless but aloof determination. She is held in contempt of court when she refuses to reveal her source, and she is put in jail. Armstrong's boss (Bassett) and her lawyer (Alda) urges her to keep up the stand she has taken, while her husband (Schwimmer) is angry that she has done this. She herself must cope with the consequences of taking on the government, and the pressure just lays on throughout the story.
Beckinsale keeps the story going easily with her brilliant performance. The story is of course, focused on her, and the effect of imprisonment and interrogation can be seen on her face when she sees her son through the glass of visiting hours, or when Dupois questions her in court. Matt Dillon is also a brilliant actor, and I hope the two of them get nominated this year. However, while Dillon deserves it, I think Alda will end up with the nomination, who is both witty and cynical throughout the court battles.
The film's true strength comes from the fact that it is not a true Hollywood film. There is a tone about it that is certainly not like a usual story like this. The characters are dark, but also with redeeming qualities. Schwimmer's character of the husband does hurtful things, but out of weakness rather than malice. Dillon's character is ruthless in his prosecution, but in truth, he is just doing his job well. Even Beckinsale's character is not the underdog hero that this film could have been about. Thankfully, this movie takes a different route.
It was a real enjoyment seeing this film. Dillon shines as he usually has when I've seen him, and so do Beckinsale and Farmiga. The only over-the-top character is that of Avril Aaronson, played by Noah Wyle, and is thankfully overshadowed by the good performances of those who carry the film.
The film is about Rachel Armstrong, a reporter (Beckinsale) who has written the story of her life: a military coup by the United States on a South American country was a lie, a Watergate, an operation that could get a president impeached. One CIA agent (Farmiga) had been there before the attack and had reported that there was no need to attack. They attacked anyway, and through a number of sources, Armstrong succeeds in finding the story. When the paper hits, the government realizes that they must find out the original source of Armstrong. Hired to find out this story is Patton Dupois (Matt Dillon), who goes after Armstrong with a ruthless but aloof determination. She is held in contempt of court when she refuses to reveal her source, and she is put in jail. Armstrong's boss (Bassett) and her lawyer (Alda) urges her to keep up the stand she has taken, while her husband (Schwimmer) is angry that she has done this. She herself must cope with the consequences of taking on the government, and the pressure just lays on throughout the story.
Beckinsale keeps the story going easily with her brilliant performance. The story is of course, focused on her, and the effect of imprisonment and interrogation can be seen on her face when she sees her son through the glass of visiting hours, or when Dupois questions her in court. Matt Dillon is also a brilliant actor, and I hope the two of them get nominated this year. However, while Dillon deserves it, I think Alda will end up with the nomination, who is both witty and cynical throughout the court battles.
The film's true strength comes from the fact that it is not a true Hollywood film. There is a tone about it that is certainly not like a usual story like this. The characters are dark, but also with redeeming qualities. Schwimmer's character of the husband does hurtful things, but out of weakness rather than malice. Dillon's character is ruthless in his prosecution, but in truth, he is just doing his job well. Even Beckinsale's character is not the underdog hero that this film could have been about. Thankfully, this movie takes a different route.
It was a real enjoyment seeing this film. Dillon shines as he usually has when I've seen him, and so do Beckinsale and Farmiga. The only over-the-top character is that of Avril Aaronson, played by Noah Wyle, and is thankfully overshadowed by the good performances of those who carry the film.
How the Film Missed the Scoop
The great strength of films about investigative journalism often lies in the rising tension, the meticulous progression of a discovery, and the suffocating sense of danger. Nothing But the Truth takes a different approach. Instead of throwing us into a spiral of increasing revelations and unsettling suspense, it hands us the bomb right from the start: journalist Rachel Armstrong (Kate Beckinsale) has the story ready, a national scoop revealing that the president ignored the findings of a CIA agent, and now the film follows her as her life unravels in the wake of the consequences of her publication.
It's a valid approach, of course, but inevitably less engaging for those who appreciate the weight of a thorough investigation and the unfolding of a growing mystery. Here, the game has already begun, and what remains for the viewer is to watch the protagonist struggle against a system that demands one non-negotiable thing from her: the revelation of her source. The issue is relevant, resonating with the debate over press freedom and professional confidentiality, but the film chooses to tell this story more through the lens of personal drama than through the tension of the legal or political conflict.
The narrative structure reinforces this focus by adopting a nearly diary-like format, highlighting Rachel's endless days in prison as her marriage collapses and her relationship with her son weakens. The intention is clear: to humanize her resistance, to make the audience feel every lost day due to her moral stubbornness. But was this the best approach? The drama works, but something is missing to make it truly impactful. Rachel's imprisonment could have been a suffocating hell, an overwhelming existential dilemma - but instead, the film takes a predictable path, lacking that unbearable sense of weight that would have made this journey memorable.
Furthermore, the film could have enriched its narrative by better exploring characters like the Special Prosecutor (Matt Dillon). He isn't a villain, just a man doing his job within the system - which, in itself, could have been an interesting point of conflict. But he remains functional, with no space for his perspective to be explored in a way that would have further challenged both the protagonist and the audience. What if we had seen a glimpse of hesitation in him? There is a clear choice to keep the drama centered on the journalist, without delving too much into the other players in this legal chess game.
The ending, however, partly compensates for the lack of impact, with a final ironic revelation about the source's identity. It's a nice touch, even though it doesn't resolve the feeling that the film was lacking a more intense energy, a more penetrating suspense. Nothing But the Truth is competent, with a solid script and effective performances, but its more sentimental and less investigative approach may not be for everyone. It's a film that fervently defends press freedom, but in the end, it feels like a highly important article that, out of fear of crossing boundaries, settles for merely skimming the surface. It lacked the boldness of a daring investigation, that scoop that turns an ordinary story into something unforgettable.
It's a valid approach, of course, but inevitably less engaging for those who appreciate the weight of a thorough investigation and the unfolding of a growing mystery. Here, the game has already begun, and what remains for the viewer is to watch the protagonist struggle against a system that demands one non-negotiable thing from her: the revelation of her source. The issue is relevant, resonating with the debate over press freedom and professional confidentiality, but the film chooses to tell this story more through the lens of personal drama than through the tension of the legal or political conflict.
The narrative structure reinforces this focus by adopting a nearly diary-like format, highlighting Rachel's endless days in prison as her marriage collapses and her relationship with her son weakens. The intention is clear: to humanize her resistance, to make the audience feel every lost day due to her moral stubbornness. But was this the best approach? The drama works, but something is missing to make it truly impactful. Rachel's imprisonment could have been a suffocating hell, an overwhelming existential dilemma - but instead, the film takes a predictable path, lacking that unbearable sense of weight that would have made this journey memorable.
Furthermore, the film could have enriched its narrative by better exploring characters like the Special Prosecutor (Matt Dillon). He isn't a villain, just a man doing his job within the system - which, in itself, could have been an interesting point of conflict. But he remains functional, with no space for his perspective to be explored in a way that would have further challenged both the protagonist and the audience. What if we had seen a glimpse of hesitation in him? There is a clear choice to keep the drama centered on the journalist, without delving too much into the other players in this legal chess game.
The ending, however, partly compensates for the lack of impact, with a final ironic revelation about the source's identity. It's a nice touch, even though it doesn't resolve the feeling that the film was lacking a more intense energy, a more penetrating suspense. Nothing But the Truth is competent, with a solid script and effective performances, but its more sentimental and less investigative approach may not be for everyone. It's a film that fervently defends press freedom, but in the end, it feels like a highly important article that, out of fear of crossing boundaries, settles for merely skimming the surface. It lacked the boldness of a daring investigation, that scoop that turns an ordinary story into something unforgettable.
Watch it!
I saw this film at a press screening last weekend. Wow! What an achievement. This story is masterfully executed, creating a lyrical and deeply affecting empathy with the film's lead character, played with Oscar-worthy precision and nuance by Kate Beckinsale. This film is truly about something, which isn't as common as I think we'd hope with movies. It has truly meaningful themes that are dramatized in an entertaining, emotional and often eloquent way. The acting is top-notch. The direction is confident.
I don't want to say much about the plot because it has some nice twists and touching moments that come from the organic development of the characters' relationships, their conflicts and their fight for what they believe in. This film is about principle. This film unapologetically stands for the power of our word and the example we set for our children. It's a must-see this Holiday season. It may only have a limited release due to complications experienced by its distributor, so get out now and see it! Don't just wait for DVD. This one is an outstanding experience in the presence of others because in many ways it's about what unites us when we believe in ourselves and the integrity of other.
I don't want to say much about the plot because it has some nice twists and touching moments that come from the organic development of the characters' relationships, their conflicts and their fight for what they believe in. This film is about principle. This film unapologetically stands for the power of our word and the example we set for our children. It's a must-see this Holiday season. It may only have a limited release due to complications experienced by its distributor, so get out now and see it! Don't just wait for DVD. This one is an outstanding experience in the presence of others because in many ways it's about what unites us when we believe in ourselves and the integrity of other.
Intence political thriller with attitude
This rates up very high on my scale as one of the better movies of 2008. Its not written as though a high and mighty political messenger wrote it, yet you do not have to look to deep to find the meaning. The star studded cast of Matt Dillon, Alan Alda and Kate Bechinsale brings out the qualities that was needed to make this type of film truly majestic.
The intense vigor of how the prosecuting attorney played by Matt Dillon, (which I first thought was going to be way out of character for him, but he pulled it off so effectively that he now has a new fan), actually attacks our protagonist is so real and matter of fact.
Being based on a true story helps in the matter of believability and the injustice of our justice system.
8/10
The intense vigor of how the prosecuting attorney played by Matt Dillon, (which I first thought was going to be way out of character for him, but he pulled it off so effectively that he now has a new fan), actually attacks our protagonist is so real and matter of fact.
Being based on a true story helps in the matter of believability and the injustice of our justice system.
8/10
The kind of intelligent movie Hollywood rarely makes anymore
This was shown last night at the Toronto International Film Festival and was very well received. It is a beautifully acted, deftly written examination of the tension between freedom of the press and the power of the state, based very loosely on the Valerie Plame case. The fact that writer and director Rod Lurie spent 13 years in the newspaper business is evident throughout, making for one of the most compelling and believable portrayals of what it is like to be a political reporter for a major newspaper since All the President's Men. Kate Beckinsale (the reporter) and Vera Farmiga (as the CIA operative) are outstanding and each delivers an Oscar-worthy performance. Matt Dillon gives one of his best performances as the smarmy, ambitious and self-righteous prosecuting attorney. David Schwimmer, an odd casting choice, does a fine job within a fairly narrow range. Surprisingly, I even enjoyed Alan Alda's performance as a high-powered, rather cynical and self-obsessed Washington lawyer, hired to defend the beleaguered reporter. But the two women really steal the show.
There was much discussion in our group about the ending and whether it enhanced or undercut the basic message of the film. No point in spoiling it here, but I can assure you it will provoke debate.
There was much discussion in our group about the ending and whether it enhanced or undercut the basic message of the film. No point in spoiling it here, but I can assure you it will provoke debate.
Did you know
- TriviaThere is a scene in the movie where Erica Van Doren (Vera Farmiga) is given a lie detector test because the CIA suspects that she leaked her own identity. Rod Lurie brought in a real life polygraphist to polygraph her for the scene. He asked her if her name was Erica Van Doren and if she worked for the CIA. After the scene was over the polygraphist called Lurie over to tell him that Farmiga beat the polygraph test because the machine said that she was telling the truth.
- GoofsWhen Rachel is beaten up in jail, she gets serious scars on her lower lip and her right eye. In a later scene, the scars are completely gone. In later subsequent scenes, the scars are back, and seen to be gradually healing.
- Quotes
Alan Burnside: A man can live a good life, be honorable, give to charity, but in the end, the number of people who come to his funeral is generally dependent on the weather.
- ConnectionsFeatured in The 14th Annual Critics' Choice Awards (2009)
Details
Box office
- Budget
- $11,500,000 (estimated)
- Gross worldwide
- $409,832
- Runtime
- 1h 48m(108 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 2.35 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content






