A Lonely Place for Dying

Not just your regular action movie. There's more behind the guns and fighting than the usual "shoot em up" action flick. The story line is actually well thought out rather than an excuse for more shooting and gore. Great for those looking for action, story twists, chemistry between the main characters, and a story line to bring it all together.

Some great names that I've never heard of before. Ross Marquand and Michael Scovotti were fantastic. Loved their chemistry on screen. Hope to see them in more movies in the future.

The directing was very well done. Truly blown away that this movie was made on a small budget. Great quality and very well written.

Very likely to keep most audiences interested through the whole film.

I don't know how did I get to see it anymore, I remember someone showing me this film, laughing. I paid attention then I started laughing too - I am not a professional film maker, I do some birthdays and parties - but this is the worst video work I've ever seen. The best scene was the ending credits. Avoid if possible. If not, then suffer watching it.

My 16 yr old recently made a film as a school project. It's some 20 times better than this un-talented waste of time. Well, what to expect from fake "wanna be" directors and writers who can justify their "movie career" only by listing their amateur films here and spending more time writing fake ratings than making more movies (if you google this Justin Eugene Evans, this is his only film in his 30+ yr long "professional career"). The guy actually walks around bragging about some 60 awards he got (!!!) and asking young people if they wanna "star" in his future projects. Not kidding, I did some research, because I was wondering who would make something this cheap and bad. Also, check out these 9 and 10 star ratings - all fakes; Never gave any other ratings and reviews other than this. Sad, pathetic and time-wasting experience. Best to be avoided at any cost.

I've seen some pretty dumb cheap indie films. You never know where you'll find the gem, something worth watching, something artistic, different. Well, this movie ain't that. I think that the actual equipment, film, lights, makeup, tapes, etc is worth way more than the movie itself. I honestly don't believe that most ratings and comments here are real. This is a horrible attempt to make a film just for the sake of making a film. Just as a guy who sucks at playing a guitar books a gig just so he can say "I'm in a band" or something. Someone made this movie only so he/she could say "I am a movie producer (or a director)..." I rarely leave any reviews, my life is too short for that, but this ***** took away time I'll never get back. the worst thing is the guy who made me see it promised a good laugh. And he was indeed laughing the whole time at technical stuff - visible microphone, bad acting, unintentional camera shaking (as if the camera guy tripped in the middle of the scene), horrible sound, etc. I didn't find it funny, it was sad.

First I couldn't believe the reviews and ratings. Then I checked the people and of course, they have left only one review (for this movie), which makes me think that those reviews are fake. I mean, they gotta be, since no one could take this film seriously, in any way. Directing, plot, acting, editing...so bad. Sound was obviously captured either on a cheap equipment, or by someone who doesn't know how to plug mics properly. I couldn't understand half of dialog. Also there's a loud noise on many places, as if they were making sound louder without eliminating noise afterwards. Editing - OMG where to start. There are PLENTY of dead frames between scenes (1 or 2 frames long, and noticeable for people who know anything about making films). All kinds of transitions, as if someone was checking what FinalCut Pro can do, browsing it's presets and adding stuff. Directing - I think there was no directing. Director probably held camera in his hand saying "now walk" and shooting from the most boring locations possible. I got seriously angry realizing how many great angles he missed. Even if he only followed the director's little black book of angles (which he didn't) it would look much better. Now it looks like when a parent shoots his kid's recital from a single spot in the audience. Extremely frustrating to watch. So I wanted to check the director who tortured me for the whole duration of this film and I discovered that this is the only thing he's done, on his own. Thanks for wasting my time. The only reason I watched the film was it's poster, which reminds me of some Tarantino flick. That is where all the similarity of course, ends. Painful to watch, better be avoid. Don't say I didn't warn you.