A bride receives a mysterious note on her wedding day, warning her that she is about to wed a serial killer.A bride receives a mysterious note on her wedding day, warning her that she is about to wed a serial killer.A bride receives a mysterious note on her wedding day, warning her that she is about to wed a serial killer.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
James Roday Rodriguez
- Carlos the Groom
- (as James Roday)
Andressa Estér
- Wedding Guest
- (uncredited)
Christian Garon
- Caterer
- (uncredited)
Jonathan R. Holeton
- Parishioner
- (uncredited)
Marie Zydek
- Female Body
- (uncredited)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Sam (Maggie Lawson) and Carlos (James Roday) are at the church, ready to be married after a very short engagement. But moments before the ceremony is scheduled to begin, a woman in a red scarf drops off a note that gets passed on to Sam: "The person you are marrying is a serial killer." She freaks out, and although she's ready to go through with the wedding, the mood was changed and the night is about to become stressful for everyone involved.
I seem to be in the minority on this episode. Michael Gingold of Fangoria didn't really care for it. But it seems every episode I liked, he didn't and every one he didn't, I did. So, Michael, I think you're a great reporter but I don't think I trust your taste in movies anymore. Further, most people seem to disapprove of it, calling it "boring" or "slow" or "confusing". I can understand it being confusing -- especially after a few plot twists and some characters are introduced who don't have very well-defined backgrounds. I didn't find it boring or slow at all, though. (I think this may be in part because I get copies of the show without the commercials... sorry, NBC.) My good friend Hannah liked it, but not as much as she liked "Family Man". I think that's a fair call and I'm not far removed from her. I think I liked "In Sickness and in Health" slightly better, but it's hard to say. They seem to be the best episodes so far (thank you, Ronny Yu and John Landis). With "Innocent Blood" still fresh in my mind, it's not surprising this one left a good taste in my mouth. I'm still holding out for next week's Stuart Gordon episode ("Eater") to be the best, but the plot doesn't impress me. And Gingold likes it, so it's bound to be horrible.
There isn't much to analyze in this week's installment, simply because most of it is suspense and very little plot. I think they succeeded on the suspense. And the traps for the audience were set up well, even if it doesn't all make sense in the end. I don't know. I liked it. Maybe Hannah is right, maybe "Family Man" is better. I'll have to wait until my second viewing when these come out on DVD. But I can say after the slow start of the series, this was a welcome addition.
I seem to be in the minority on this episode. Michael Gingold of Fangoria didn't really care for it. But it seems every episode I liked, he didn't and every one he didn't, I did. So, Michael, I think you're a great reporter but I don't think I trust your taste in movies anymore. Further, most people seem to disapprove of it, calling it "boring" or "slow" or "confusing". I can understand it being confusing -- especially after a few plot twists and some characters are introduced who don't have very well-defined backgrounds. I didn't find it boring or slow at all, though. (I think this may be in part because I get copies of the show without the commercials... sorry, NBC.) My good friend Hannah liked it, but not as much as she liked "Family Man". I think that's a fair call and I'm not far removed from her. I think I liked "In Sickness and in Health" slightly better, but it's hard to say. They seem to be the best episodes so far (thank you, Ronny Yu and John Landis). With "Innocent Blood" still fresh in my mind, it's not surprising this one left a good taste in my mouth. I'm still holding out for next week's Stuart Gordon episode ("Eater") to be the best, but the plot doesn't impress me. And Gingold likes it, so it's bound to be horrible.
There isn't much to analyze in this week's installment, simply because most of it is suspense and very little plot. I think they succeeded on the suspense. And the traps for the audience were set up well, even if it doesn't all make sense in the end. I don't know. I liked it. Maybe Hannah is right, maybe "Family Man" is better. I'll have to wait until my second viewing when these come out on DVD. But I can say after the slow start of the series, this was a welcome addition.
This episode falls apart in nearly every way possible. The characters overreact to everything. The final revelation is anything but surprising, and yet, once we know it, nothing we've seen before makes any sense. Some mysterious characters' motivations are never explained. In short, the entire script plays out like a poorly conceived "gotcha" that strains credulity at every turn. You persevere to the end hoping that at least the explanation will offer something of a payoff, but everything just crumbles like dry mud.
Nor does the direction help in the least. The characters are either annoying or unlikable. Humorous moments are thrown in with no rhyme or reason. We cut to commercial seemingly every three minutes. And worst of all, THERE'S NO FEAR! There have been some entertaining entries in the series, but this is not one of them. It feels like a student film based on a high-schooler's screenplay. Skip it.
Nor does the direction help in the least. The characters are either annoying or unlikable. Humorous moments are thrown in with no rhyme or reason. We cut to commercial seemingly every three minutes. And worst of all, THERE'S NO FEAR! There have been some entertaining entries in the series, but this is not one of them. It feels like a student film based on a high-schooler's screenplay. Skip it.
It's bizarre how the last 5 minutes or so completely ruined any potential this episode could have achieved.. Not only were there many plot holes, but the twist completely ruins any credibility to any of the story up until that point. It feels like the writer was hoping no one would remember anything they saw for the first 40 minutes.
I never write reviews for TV shows or movies, but this show left me completely frustrated and irritated when it ended. Everything that had happened either was left unanswered, or made no sense. I wont put any spoilers here, in case someone is reading reviews before seeing the episode.
Honestly, I did like the acting, and felt enveloped in the story. The ending was just far too forced, and seemed tacked on, and didn't belong there.
I never write reviews for TV shows or movies, but this show left me completely frustrated and irritated when it ended. Everything that had happened either was left unanswered, or made no sense. I wont put any spoilers here, in case someone is reading reviews before seeing the episode.
Honestly, I did like the acting, and felt enveloped in the story. The ending was just far too forced, and seemed tacked on, and didn't belong there.
On the day of her wedding, the bride Samantha is celebrating with her maid of honors Ruthie and Kelly while dressing. Out of blue, Ruthie brings a note for Samantha and tells that a woman has delivered it of Father Chris that is deaf. Samantha reads the note that tells that "The person you are marrying is a serial killer". She does not show the note to Ruthie but asks her to show who gave the note but the woman has gone away. Ruthie feels that something is wrong and stares at Carlos with angry face. Along the night, Samantha is tense until the moment that the truth is disclosed.
"In Sickness and in Health" is a disappointing episode of "Fear Itself" since the confused plot point is sort of silly. The deception is greater based on the name of the director John Landis. My vote is five.
Title (Brazil): "In Sickness and in Health"
"In Sickness and in Health" is a disappointing episode of "Fear Itself" since the confused plot point is sort of silly. The deception is greater based on the name of the director John Landis. My vote is five.
Title (Brazil): "In Sickness and in Health"
Fear Itself: In Sickness and In Health (2008)
*** (out of 4)
Right before her wedding stars, a woman (Maggie Lawson) receives a letter from a mysterious woman warning her that the groom (James Roday) is a serial killer. The bride to be naturally freaks out but goes ahead with the wedding but begins to fear that the note might contain the truth. Landis contributed a couple entries in the Masters of Horror series and I loved both of them but while this here is a step backwards there are still many interesting aspects. Landis has always added a lot comic relief to his horror films but that's not the case here as the director stays away from the laughs and instead tries to deliver the suspense. It's also worth noting that the director doesn't try to fall back on any gore, which is rather refreshing for a horror film of today. There are several nods to Hitchcock here and the film plays out a lot like you'd expect from him and that includes a couple twists in the story, which come out of no where and really work very well. I won't ruin the twists but they certainly caught me off guard and when I went back and thought about the clues in the film I was even more impressed at how well they worked and how well the story was put together by screenwriter Victor Salva. My biggest problem with the film was the performance by Lawson who I feel really kills the momentum in the story. She handles the scary stuff just fine but I found her to be quite annoying throughout the movie and while some of this might fall into the lap of Landis, I still found the actress to be fairly lame. Roday on the other hand delivers a very strong performance and he does a great job at building the mystery around his character that we're never quite sure what to think of him. Marshall Bell, one of my favorite character actors, is also on hand but isn't given too much to do in the role of twins.
*** (out of 4)
Right before her wedding stars, a woman (Maggie Lawson) receives a letter from a mysterious woman warning her that the groom (James Roday) is a serial killer. The bride to be naturally freaks out but goes ahead with the wedding but begins to fear that the note might contain the truth. Landis contributed a couple entries in the Masters of Horror series and I loved both of them but while this here is a step backwards there are still many interesting aspects. Landis has always added a lot comic relief to his horror films but that's not the case here as the director stays away from the laughs and instead tries to deliver the suspense. It's also worth noting that the director doesn't try to fall back on any gore, which is rather refreshing for a horror film of today. There are several nods to Hitchcock here and the film plays out a lot like you'd expect from him and that includes a couple twists in the story, which come out of no where and really work very well. I won't ruin the twists but they certainly caught me off guard and when I went back and thought about the clues in the film I was even more impressed at how well they worked and how well the story was put together by screenwriter Victor Salva. My biggest problem with the film was the performance by Lawson who I feel really kills the momentum in the story. She handles the scary stuff just fine but I found her to be quite annoying throughout the movie and while some of this might fall into the lap of Landis, I still found the actress to be fairly lame. Roday on the other hand delivers a very strong performance and he does a great job at building the mystery around his character that we're never quite sure what to think of him. Marshall Bell, one of my favorite character actors, is also on hand but isn't given too much to do in the role of twins.
Did you know
- TriviaAt the time of this episode's production and airing, Maggie Lawson and James Roday, who played the newly-married couple, were in a relationship in real-life. They concurrently acted together in Psych (2006) and would share a small scene in Gamer (2009) a year later.
Details
- Runtime
- 43m
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.78 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content