IMDb RATING
2.8/10
9.2K
YOUR RATING
A mercenary-for-hire accepts a mission from a billionaire to capture a dangerous snake that could possibly help cure a terminal illness.A mercenary-for-hire accepts a mission from a billionaire to capture a dangerous snake that could possibly help cure a terminal illness.A mercenary-for-hire accepts a mission from a billionaire to capture a dangerous snake that could possibly help cure a terminal illness.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
Alan O'Silva
- Andrei
- (as Alin Olteanu)
Mihaela Elena Oros
- Sofia
- (as Mihaela 'Sasha' Oros)
Alin Florian Constantinescu
- Darryl
- (as Alin Constantinescu)
Banica Gheorghe
- Farmer
- (as Gheorghe Banica)
Bart Sidles
- Guard
- (as Barton Sidles)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Summary
Reviewers say 'Anaconda 3: Offspring' is criticized for its poor CGI, generic plot, and subpar acting, even from recognizable actors like David Hasselhoff and John Rhys-Davies. The film lacks character development and an engaging narrative. However, some find it entertaining for its campy, B-movie charm and over-the-top gore, offering a guilty pleasure for fans of the genre.
Featured reviews
I knew from the beginning this will be a poor film, but didn't expect so many failures. To such an extent that this is more amusing than the movie itself.
Yes, the CGI is from 60-s, the acting is poor, except for Crystal Allen and Patrick Regis in few moments. But it is so funny to see anacondas move in a straight line - which is impossible for snakes! Or when David Hasselhoff dialled on the phone with all fingers simultaneously! I was sure he is misleading his companions and was surprised the phone call was not fake...
In a summary - if you enjoy to find silly mistakes in films - you're on a right place! But don't expect anything else from that movie.
Yes, the CGI is from 60-s, the acting is poor, except for Crystal Allen and Patrick Regis in few moments. But it is so funny to see anacondas move in a straight line - which is impossible for snakes! Or when David Hasselhoff dialled on the phone with all fingers simultaneously! I was sure he is misleading his companions and was surprised the phone call was not fake...
In a summary - if you enjoy to find silly mistakes in films - you're on a right place! But don't expect anything else from that movie.
We went into this movie with incredibly low expectations seeing as we were looking for a bad movie that we could just laugh it. This movie far underachieved even my lowest expectations. The acting was worse then in a porno, there was no beginning or ending, it just went and at the first close up sight of the anaconda rather then feeling a slight chill every single person in the room burst out laughing. Throughout the entire movie I did not know a single characters name, because they didn't bother with character development of any sort. And the highlight of the movie was of course David Hasselhoff, who's mustache would mysteriously appear and reappear from scene to scene. All in all this movie was a masterpiece of terrible, perfect if your looking to mercilessly mock something with a group of close friends.
While researching an offspring of anaconda with transgenic for saving lives discovering cure for cancer and Alzheimer in the facility of Wexel Hall Pharmaceutics, the CEO Murdoch (John Rhys-Davies) refuses to invest in a larger tank and more security and staff as advised by the head of the project, Dr. Amanda Hayes (Crystal Allen). When he focuses a light in the tank, the anaconda attacks and breaks out the confined facility. Murdoch hires a team leaded by the mercenary Hammett (David Hasselhoff) to destroy the animal.
What a crap this lame "Anaconda III" is! This collection of clichés is awful, not funny, noisy and ridiculous, with terrible screenplay, acting and CGI. I believe the anaconda likes dyed blonde since the beast attacks everybody but the twenty-nine year old scientist along the story. Do not waste your time like I did is my final advice. My vote is one.
Title (Brazil): "Anaconda 3"
What a crap this lame "Anaconda III" is! This collection of clichés is awful, not funny, noisy and ridiculous, with terrible screenplay, acting and CGI. I believe the anaconda likes dyed blonde since the beast attacks everybody but the twenty-nine year old scientist along the story. Do not waste your time like I did is my final advice. My vote is one.
Title (Brazil): "Anaconda 3"
OK, this is such a load of horse poo i give it a minus 1. So bad and cheap and again bad it is actually not even funny. Filmed in east Europe but failing east Europe standards - that says a lot. The entire film budget probably would not last for producing half a bay watch episode. Note the elegant transition because this brings us right to ...
And then there's the thing where this movie has THE HOFF in it, which counts automatically for 3 points. Making a total of 2 points.
I take it all warnings to watch this crap are in vain because YOU MUST HAVE THE HOFF! And right you are.
Trust in THE HOFF, THE HOFF is good.
And then there's the thing where this movie has THE HOFF in it, which counts automatically for 3 points. Making a total of 2 points.
I take it all warnings to watch this crap are in vain because YOU MUST HAVE THE HOFF! And right you are.
Trust in THE HOFF, THE HOFF is good.
The first Anaconda was passable, the second was pretty poor but nothing could have prepared me for this! Though the ultra low IMDB rating should have really come to mention it.
I guess was doomed from the start, it has a tiny budget by comparison, it's the third film in an already cheesy scyfy level franchise and the biggest star they could get to carry the movie was the "Hoff".
So yeah, it all looks so very terrible. I could do better sfx than this (And have), the snakes look pitiful and the cast look positively bored throughout.
Though Hasselhoff is better than usual he still can't carry a film and the incredible John Rhys-Davies has a heartbreakingly small role here.
To make matters even worse the plot is generic, the pace is snooze worthy and the whole thing is just seven shades of embarassing.
One more movie to go at time of writing, it can't get worse than this........right?
The Good:
The "Hoff" is better than usual
John Rhys-Davies
The Bad:
Poor cgi
Actually manages to be incredibly boring
The advertised "Stars" are barely in the film
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
Always know the animal before the hunt
Cool girls don't look at explosions either
I guess was doomed from the start, it has a tiny budget by comparison, it's the third film in an already cheesy scyfy level franchise and the biggest star they could get to carry the movie was the "Hoff".
So yeah, it all looks so very terrible. I could do better sfx than this (And have), the snakes look pitiful and the cast look positively bored throughout.
Though Hasselhoff is better than usual he still can't carry a film and the incredible John Rhys-Davies has a heartbreakingly small role here.
To make matters even worse the plot is generic, the pace is snooze worthy and the whole thing is just seven shades of embarassing.
One more movie to go at time of writing, it can't get worse than this........right?
The Good:
The "Hoff" is better than usual
John Rhys-Davies
The Bad:
Poor cgi
Actually manages to be incredibly boring
The advertised "Stars" are barely in the film
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
Always know the animal before the hunt
Cool girls don't look at explosions either
Did you know
- TriviaShot back-to-back with Anacondas: Trail of Blood (2009).
- GoofsWhen Amanda is in the van after it crashes, the camera first pans to the snake above her. When the camera pans back to her, a crew member can be clearly seen walking past through the window behind her.
- Crazy credits'Stage 6 Productions', the production company credited for the film, is an in-joke regarding the local Romanian service provider, 'Castel Films Romania' which has 10 sound stages on their lot, but no stage 6.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Anacondas: Trail of Blood (2009)
- SoundtracksConcerto 1052 for Harpsichord
Written by Johann Sebastian Bach (as Bach)
Performed by Garry Johnston
Courtesy of Noma Music
Details
- Runtime
- 1h 31m(91 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content