The whole Lightman group solves the case of terrorist bombings in the D.C. area. Dr. Foster has escalating problems with her marriage. Torres's boyfriend in the Secret Service is in danger.The whole Lightman group solves the case of terrorist bombings in the D.C. area. Dr. Foster has escalating problems with her marriage. Torres's boyfriend in the Secret Service is in danger.The whole Lightman group solves the case of terrorist bombings in the D.C. area. Dr. Foster has escalating problems with her marriage. Torres's boyfriend in the Secret Service is in danger.
Leo Solomon
- Walid
- (as a different name)
Nick McDow Musleh
- Rasheed
- (as Nick McDow)
Featured reviews
When a bomb explodes in a bus in Washington D. C., The Lightman Group is hired to investigate. The Al Qaeda assumes the terrorist attack and the student Jamal is the responsible. The FBI arrests his soccer coach, but Dr. Lightman concludes that the man is innocent. Then the frequenters of the Mosque that Jamal used to go are brought to be interrogated by Dr. Foster and Torres, and they find three suspects. Out of the blue, a bomb explodes in the mall and the responsible, Rasheed, was not identified by Torres that feels bad. Soon Dr. Lightman finds that Jamal and Rasheed are also victims, and not responsible for the explosions that have been remotely activated. Who might be the mastermind?
"Sacrifice" is the last episode of the First Season of "Lie to Me". The plot is excellent and very well-written, with many twists as usual. The subplots of Torres and her boyfriend from the Secret Service Karl Dupree and Dr. Foster and her problematic husband Alec Foster are fillers of the episode. My vote is eight.
Title (Brazil): "Sacrifice"
"Sacrifice" is the last episode of the First Season of "Lie to Me". The plot is excellent and very well-written, with many twists as usual. The subplots of Torres and her boyfriend from the Secret Service Karl Dupree and Dr. Foster and her problematic husband Alec Foster are fillers of the episode. My vote is eight.
Title (Brazil): "Sacrifice"
Maybe it is just because I am watching more US network television in the past few years but for me it is hard for me to try and keep the many shows that fit the same formula separate in my head. Each weekly episode is a case which is started and solved in that hour, the lead is a distinctive character (usually male) who is an expert of some sort, which perhaps makes up for his social shortcomings, and he has a team made up of various men and women, most of whom are smart and beautiful. As it is in House, so it was in Shark, so it is in The Mentalist, so it was in Life, so it is in Lie to Me. For some reason it is a formula that appears to be in every corner of the networks, which each one looking to do the same again but slightly different to capture the same viewers until eventually fatigue sets in.
This point has not been met yet and perhaps it never will as long as the old shows are retired with the remembrance of "classics" while the old frame has new clothes draped over it to start again. If I sound a little snobby then forgive me because this formulaic television serves a purpose and much of it is good and solidly entertaining. Lie to Me is mostly no exception as it is generally pretty good. The cases each week are interesting enough with plenty of little twists and red-herrings to hold the attention and of course it is all as glossy as sin with lots of the musical cues etc that one expects. In the background the show uses the characters themselves as a narrative thread, which has the potential to be more rewarding than the usual "backdrop" of a specific killer or crime that will be rolled out for season finales etc (a la The Mentalist) but in the short term it feels a little lacking when watching with an eye to formula.
One thing that perhaps the formula lacks as well is the firm presence of a police presence or character. This changes a little towards the end of the season but this role is required to ensure that Lightman and his team have a reason to be involved as they are – heck, even Psych knows that. As it is the weakest episodes are the ones where Lightman either has no business doing what he is doing or how/why he is involved is not clear. The episode on the building collapse is one example but the one with the suicides of the two young Indian women is the worse. While the lack of realism in these shows is usually just best ignored, this is not the same as bemoaning CSI saying that CSI officers would not be leading investigations or talking to suspects because in that example it makes sense in regards the internal logic of the show – but with Lie to Me these episodes don't work within the show's own internal logic.
This is not a deal breaker though and the majority of the episodes are not like this, but the ones that are really struggle to get past that. What the show benefits from is the delivery of the formula elements, specifically the casting of a distinctive Brit in the lead. Although he plays up his accent I think, Roth is enjoyable in the lead. He is best when playing with suspects and doing his thing. While he does have "deeper" material to deliver to develop his character he isn't quite as good here. He is well supported by Williams (who works well with him) and Raymund (who is much better than I thought she would be – at first I assumed she was just the "hot ethnic" cast member). Hines I'm not too bothered about but he does a solid job. The addition of Phifer at the end of the first season bodes well for that as well, although I'm not sure what the point of Sean Patrick Thomas floating around was. Beals offered more than the script allowed her to bring – I didn't think the ex-wife character added to the narrative but she was useful as a narrative device in terms of getting the team involved in cases.
Lie to Me is not brilliant, not is it particularly fresh or startling, but it does hit the formula well enough to be enjoyable in the main. I will watch season 2 at some point but will do so hoping that it can hold the formula points that it is doing well but build on them to become a bit more distinctive and sure of itself so that it can become a good show beyond the formula, rather than just sticking to it as part of a pack.
This point has not been met yet and perhaps it never will as long as the old shows are retired with the remembrance of "classics" while the old frame has new clothes draped over it to start again. If I sound a little snobby then forgive me because this formulaic television serves a purpose and much of it is good and solidly entertaining. Lie to Me is mostly no exception as it is generally pretty good. The cases each week are interesting enough with plenty of little twists and red-herrings to hold the attention and of course it is all as glossy as sin with lots of the musical cues etc that one expects. In the background the show uses the characters themselves as a narrative thread, which has the potential to be more rewarding than the usual "backdrop" of a specific killer or crime that will be rolled out for season finales etc (a la The Mentalist) but in the short term it feels a little lacking when watching with an eye to formula.
One thing that perhaps the formula lacks as well is the firm presence of a police presence or character. This changes a little towards the end of the season but this role is required to ensure that Lightman and his team have a reason to be involved as they are – heck, even Psych knows that. As it is the weakest episodes are the ones where Lightman either has no business doing what he is doing or how/why he is involved is not clear. The episode on the building collapse is one example but the one with the suicides of the two young Indian women is the worse. While the lack of realism in these shows is usually just best ignored, this is not the same as bemoaning CSI saying that CSI officers would not be leading investigations or talking to suspects because in that example it makes sense in regards the internal logic of the show – but with Lie to Me these episodes don't work within the show's own internal logic.
This is not a deal breaker though and the majority of the episodes are not like this, but the ones that are really struggle to get past that. What the show benefits from is the delivery of the formula elements, specifically the casting of a distinctive Brit in the lead. Although he plays up his accent I think, Roth is enjoyable in the lead. He is best when playing with suspects and doing his thing. While he does have "deeper" material to deliver to develop his character he isn't quite as good here. He is well supported by Williams (who works well with him) and Raymund (who is much better than I thought she would be – at first I assumed she was just the "hot ethnic" cast member). Hines I'm not too bothered about but he does a solid job. The addition of Phifer at the end of the first season bodes well for that as well, although I'm not sure what the point of Sean Patrick Thomas floating around was. Beals offered more than the script allowed her to bring – I didn't think the ex-wife character added to the narrative but she was useful as a narrative device in terms of getting the team involved in cases.
Lie to Me is not brilliant, not is it particularly fresh or startling, but it does hit the formula well enough to be enjoyable in the main. I will watch season 2 at some point but will do so hoping that it can hold the formula points that it is doing well but build on them to become a bit more distinctive and sure of itself so that it can become a good show beyond the formula, rather than just sticking to it as part of a pack.
I never understand why Hollywood series would think it is okay to use African Americans who are of West African descent (most often mixed with substantial North European ancestry too) play the roles of East Africans and especially those from Ethiopia or Somalia, you look VERY different from other Africans. For a series that is all about reading subtle facial expressions, Not being able to distinguish facial traits of West Africans and Somali people is just as bad as not being able to distinguish basic human emotions on one's face. Of course the easy explanation is that Hollywood producers just don't care because a black person is a black person, right? But it would be like casting a Finnish actor to play the role of her Greek or Portuguese person. That would look ridiculous to most white people. So why is it ok to put all black people in the same basket?
Did you know
- TriviaHayley McFarland (Emily Lightman) and Anthony Azizi (Omar Kahn) both would appear on Sons of Anarchy a couple years after this episode. In the previous episode, Emilio Rivera guest starred as the guard accused of being the copycat. He was also in Sons of Anarchy before and after this appearance.
- GoofsDuring the conversation between Lightman and Foster after her upsetting call with her husband, one shot of Lightman has been reversed. The door behind him swaps sides and the parting in his hair changes from the left to the right side of this head. This must have been done in order to preserve his eye line and not "cross the line" because of a different camera angle.
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Filming locations
- Los Angeles, California, USA(Location)
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 44m
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 16:9 HD
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content