Not everything needs to be a movie
This movie could have been a newspaper article that you'd read in like 6 minutes. There's really nothing that requires a scenic implementation. The whole dialogue feels like a business meeting and, while that is the core scene of it all, it drags over a runtime of nearly two hours.
I like the aesthetic and the attention to detail when making the time period come to life, and I couldn't say there would be any bad performances in the movie. Just nothing groundbreaking either. It's also a weird decision to only show Michael Jordan from behind. And it hs like five endings, everytime you think it ends there's another scene.
Finally, I personally hate "where are they now"-text screens at the end of such movies with a burning passion, but as anything else, that's subjective.
This is not a bad movie. It's just very bland.
I like the aesthetic and the attention to detail when making the time period come to life, and I couldn't say there would be any bad performances in the movie. Just nothing groundbreaking either. It's also a weird decision to only show Michael Jordan from behind. And it hs like five endings, everytime you think it ends there's another scene.
Finally, I personally hate "where are they now"-text screens at the end of such movies with a burning passion, but as anything else, that's subjective.
This is not a bad movie. It's just very bland.
- lukasntz
- Apr 6, 2023