IMDb RATING
3.9/10
1.3K
YOUR RATING
A family getaway to a mountain town turns deadly when China launches a massive cyberattack against the USA, forcing former NSA engineer Duke Evans to fight to save his wife and daughter in t... Read allA family getaway to a mountain town turns deadly when China launches a massive cyberattack against the USA, forcing former NSA engineer Duke Evans to fight to save his wife and daughter in the New World Order.A family getaway to a mountain town turns deadly when China launches a massive cyberattack against the USA, forcing former NSA engineer Duke Evans to fight to save his wife and daughter in the New World Order.
- Awards
- 1 nomination total
William Frederick Knight
- Albert Grimes
- (as William Knight)
William Ngo
- Chinese Officer
- (as William Wu)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
This movie was bad all around. The acting was terrible and timing was bad. cinematography timing and quality all bad. Story as it progressed was unbelievable and unrealistic. script was just really, really bad. unsuccessful knockoff of red dawn. This really was one of the worst movies I watched this year but it was all I had. I have seen sci-fi channel movies that were better than this. Watch it if you want but you won't get that time back. I don't even know what else to say about it to take up the remaining ten lines. I guess if you are really bored you could watch it and be entertained by how bad it is. Some people are into that kind of thing...
I have never given such a low rating before, but this movie had no redeeming factors and it therefore deserved such a dubious distinction.
The acting was complete cardboard with most of the time my wishing the main characters would get killed off since they were so annoying. To add to the distaste, the characters simply weren't believable either.
Add to that an extremely poor plot with more holes than my grandfather's underwear, with a great big dollop of the incredulity bred of a hundred plot points where you yourself could think your way out of it or it simply wasn't feasible, and you honestly have a sincere waste of time.
The acting was complete cardboard with most of the time my wishing the main characters would get killed off since they were so annoying. To add to the distaste, the characters simply weren't believable either.
Add to that an extremely poor plot with more holes than my grandfather's underwear, with a great big dollop of the incredulity bred of a hundred plot points where you yourself could think your way out of it or it simply wasn't feasible, and you honestly have a sincere waste of time.
I don't understand the reasoning behind some of the reviews for this film. It's fiction,so relating it to real life events is to no purpose.
For me,it was reminiscent of 'Threads',in that it posited the idea of a devastating event which changed everyday life in a bad way,though with contemporary ideas:technology rather than nuclear devastation.
The acting was good for the most part and it did not rely on spectacular special effects.
Instead,it acheived an extremely chilling effect as the story unfolded gradually.
I,for one,was left feeling that the scenario was not entirely unbelievable.
It engrossed me sufficiently to recommend it to anyone who thinks seriously about the state of our world and it's implications.
For me,it was reminiscent of 'Threads',in that it posited the idea of a devastating event which changed everyday life in a bad way,though with contemporary ideas:technology rather than nuclear devastation.
The acting was good for the most part and it did not rely on spectacular special effects.
Instead,it acheived an extremely chilling effect as the story unfolded gradually.
I,for one,was left feeling that the scenario was not entirely unbelievable.
It engrossed me sufficiently to recommend it to anyone who thinks seriously about the state of our world and it's implications.
What a great story. This movie has the storyline of a big budget movie. Definitely worth watching.
Now, I have to say that the acting was a bit spotty. It wasn't uniformly great, but pretty good nonetheless. Largely, the problem with the acting was bad timing, and I don't think that was the actor's faults. There were scenes where the cinematography was a bit off and editing could have been better. The action scenes were a bit stifled and could have done with better choreography. There was definitely a place for some big action and explosions, but this movie (I'm assuming because of a constrained budget) didn't go that route. But, again, overall a good movie. This is one of those low budget movies that could be really successfully remade into a blockbuster. That said, this movie stands head and shoulders above other low budget movies I've seen.
In short: Worth watching.
Now, I have to say that the acting was a bit spotty. It wasn't uniformly great, but pretty good nonetheless. Largely, the problem with the acting was bad timing, and I don't think that was the actor's faults. There were scenes where the cinematography was a bit off and editing could have been better. The action scenes were a bit stifled and could have done with better choreography. There was definitely a place for some big action and explosions, but this movie (I'm assuming because of a constrained budget) didn't go that route. But, again, overall a good movie. This is one of those low budget movies that could be really successfully remade into a blockbuster. That said, this movie stands head and shoulders above other low budget movies I've seen.
In short: Worth watching.
Low budget films can flop if they start too slow, but this one has some pace. The story was very intelligent, not overly complicated. The plot was simple, believable and no obvious holes. The directing was very good, give Mr. Travis a real budget :). The acting was average to decent, except the wife (Wallander), who's expressions at times left me confused to irritated. Maybe that's what she was going for.
The best part of the movie is the concept and plot. I'm a fan of IT as well as lo-tech, and who doesn't think about what you would do if things went sour. This has it all, and watching it you might learn a few things. It really makes you think.
Not wasted time at all, I was pleasantly surprised and would watch it again if friends ask.
The best part of the movie is the concept and plot. I'm a fan of IT as well as lo-tech, and who doesn't think about what you would do if things went sour. This has it all, and watching it you might learn a few things. It really makes you think.
Not wasted time at all, I was pleasantly surprised and would watch it again if friends ask.
Did you know
- TriviaThe "transmitter " is a Yaesu FRG7 which is a receiver
- GoofsHow come the sister's bracelet burned her when she left the cabin, but his burned him when he left the country and not earlier? I did not hear they had redesigned the bracelets. When Duke cooperates and disables the back door security breach, Phil says, "My thank-you gift to you: you're free to travel wherever you want in the Republic."
- Quotes
Duke Evans: All of our electronics... all these devices... can be accessed over a secret wireless network.
- ConnectionsReferences Flatland: The Movie (2007)
- SoundtracksByeBye
Written by Laurie Crook, Greg Thomas, Jeffrey Thomas, Ryan Fisher
Performed by Crooked Tom
Courtesy of Crooked Tom
- How long is Dragon Day?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Budget
- $210,000 (estimated)
- Runtime
- 1h 35m(95 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.78 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content