Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsBest Of 2025Holiday Watch GuideGotham AwardsCelebrity PhotosSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Dimensions

  • 2011
  • 1h 41m
IMDb RATING
5.8/10
614
YOUR RATING
Dimensions (2011)
Stephen is a brilliant young boy who lives in England, in what appears to be the 1920s – but nothing in Stephen’s life is quite as it seems.  His world is turned upside down upon meeting a charismatic and inspirational professor at a garden party, who demonstrates to Stephen and his friends what life would be like if they themselves were merely one, or two, dimensional beings.  He then proceeds to explain that by manipulating other dimensions, time travel may actually be possible.

As StephenÂ’s life unfolds, events lead him to dedicate himself to turning the ProfessorÂ’s theories of time travel into reality.  Jealousy, love, obsession, temptation and greed surround him, influencing his fragile mind and the direction of his work.
Play trailer1:48
1 Video
1 Photo
DramaSci-Fi

Cambridge, England, 1921 - or so it seems. A brilliant young scientist becomes obsessed with finding a way back to his past - no matter what the cost.Cambridge, England, 1921 - or so it seems. A brilliant young scientist becomes obsessed with finding a way back to his past - no matter what the cost.Cambridge, England, 1921 - or so it seems. A brilliant young scientist becomes obsessed with finding a way back to his past - no matter what the cost.

  • Director
    • Sloane U'Ren
  • Writer
    • Antony Neely
  • Stars
    • Henry Lloyd-Hughes
    • Camilla Rutherford
    • Patrick Godfrey
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    5.8/10
    614
    YOUR RATING
    • Director
      • Sloane U'Ren
    • Writer
      • Antony Neely
    • Stars
      • Henry Lloyd-Hughes
      • Camilla Rutherford
      • Patrick Godfrey
    • 24User reviews
    • 9Critic reviews
  • See production info at IMDbPro
    • Awards
      • 4 wins & 3 nominations total

    Videos1

    Dimensions:  A Line, A Loop, A Tangle of Threads
    Trailer 1:48
    Dimensions: A Line, A Loop, A Tangle of Threads

    Photos

    Top Cast23

    Edit
    Henry Lloyd-Hughes
    Henry Lloyd-Hughes
    • Stephen
    Camilla Rutherford
    Camilla Rutherford
    • Jane
    Patrick Godfrey
    Patrick Godfrey
    • The Professor
    Olivia Llewellyn
    Olivia Llewellyn
    • Annie
    Sean Hart
    • Conrad
    Edward Halsted
    • Robert
    Richard Heffer
    Richard Heffer
    • Dr. Schmidt
    Georgina Rich
    Georgina Rich
    • Alice
    James Greene
    James Greene
    • Old Man
    Sam Harrison
    • Young Stephen
    Hannah Carson
    • Victoria
    George Thomas
    • Young Conrad
    Siân Mayhall-Purvis
    • Barmaid
    Shaun Lucas
    • Boss
    Peter Hammond
    • Porter
    Andrew Lanchbury
    • Chess Player in Pub
    Antony Neely
    • Chess Player in Pub
    Shane Lucas
    • Stephen (16 Years Old)
    • Director
      • Sloane U'Ren
    • Writer
      • Antony Neely
    • All cast & crew
    • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

    User reviews24

    5.8614
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Featured reviews

    7SwiftieFreddie

    Good watch with Aaron from Killing Eve as a likeable character

    Another example of me being happy I ignored a rather low overall IMDB score and trusted in the more generous reviews. Beautifully shot movie with beautiful music. Natural performances all round. I am interested in movies to do with time/ universe travel - Back to the Future, Time Traveller's Wife (book not movie though) Somewhere in Time with Jane Seymour and Christopher Reeve, Groundhog Day, Everything Everywhere All at Once. I try not to live in the past anymore but my heart breaks for past times and lost love. But things happened as they did and they couldn't have happened any other way. Maybe there are many universes. Maybe we can come into alignment with the one we most desire. Maybe there's some truth in Neville Goddard's imaginal and law of assumption theories. Affirming that it is already done. I have the life and the love of the life I want etc. Maybe it's for the best that such a machine doesn't exist.
    3brianberns-1

    Underwhelming

    I'm usually a sucker for science fiction, and time travel in particular, but this movie was underwhelming. The characters are severely under-developed and uninteresting. One of the main characters is so empty that at one point the protagonist suggests that she might not be real, and she has no response.

    The time-travel elements of the movie are similarly devoid of interest, and the supposed plot is elementary. I think most of the effort on this movie went into period sets, costumes and haircuts. It certainly doesn't show up in the writing, acting, or directing.
    7torontofred

    The reality of enjoying a movie

    Science fiction is a finicky thing. Depending on your approach and your tastes and background, this flick can either be 1 to 10. I encourage the reader to read the reviews as a form of entertainment in itself, I would also ask the reader to refrain from critiquing this movie as if it had a limitless budget and was hell bent on employing the best special effects possible. In other words, a Hollywood movie. Sadly, too many of our young are trapped there.

    It has been my experience that the best SciFi allows you to use your imagination. You read SciFi and imagine great things that Hollywood couldn't begin to portray. "The Time Machine", 1960, must be one of the greatest movies in this subject. It has roots in H.G.Wells' 1895 "The Time Machine" novel. Interesting point, the character in the movie shares a similar name with the author of the book. The acting may not be the best, the special effects not out of this world and the script could use more "airing". Your imagination, however, takes over and fills in the blanks to make it a very interesting movie to this date. If the script and story line can allow your imagination to flourish, then at the end of the movie you find yourself thinking. Although the movie ended.... you're still going.

    It's nice to see special effects to replace your imagination every now and then but I find it's best when it is left to the imagination. This is why most stories that try to make the transition from book to movie fail.

    On acting.... you may have an idea how a soldier would reacted when facing a platoon of the enemy on his own. We can draw from our limited experience. But has anyone ever met an alien? How does one act when stepping into a time machine? How does one act when they fall in love with someone who wishes to step into a time machine. You can have a whole movie on that alone. Acting in this instance should allow some leeway for the viewer to fill in with their imagination. On the other hand, acting may be what saves the scene such as the end scene to Casablanca with a fake aircraft with little people or La Marseillaise scene sung in defiance to the Germans. In this movie, although the genre was SciFi, the secondary theme was love. Another, loss. Yet another, jealousy. This requires fine acting, not supper acting, and I think it was done adequately well. Not great but well. To tell you the truth, my heart broke for one of the characters.

    Lets use our imagination on one angle of the movie.... sound. If you wish to employ frequencies in your experiment and need a fundamental series of frequencies, the piano is an interesting choice. And it's calibrated to some standard. Believe it or not, there are a few established standards in piano calibration and tuning. The piano can be a scientific instrument in every sense of the word. So it wasn't a screwball idea to use a piano. But a piano is also musical. It has Rhythm and beats and bars. Now, imagine an infinite number of future threads to an event. In a song, we may have four beats to a bar. Every four beats you repeat. And repeat. And repeat. Almost as if it is infinite. It generates a Rhythm that explores a theme, or event. Changing notes in one bar with just four beats (4/4 for example) could change the entire theme of the song. Mapping out the future of Victoria's event in the well and navigating it successfully with a sound signature (so may beats to a bar) is an interesting connection to the piano. We can now layer other life experiences to music, such as falling in love, as was the case when they danced through the time map to music, expanding the parallelism to a theme or song. Interesting? How about dancing to music when the old man removed their masks in the beginning of the movie? How about our young hero dancing with the blindfold on in front of the well after removing the welded well cap at the start?

    In my experience, I have found that the best attributes to enjoying good SciFi is the person's ability to imagine. Overload the person with special effects and at the end of the movie the person may experience relief (and to beat the crowd out of the theater) instead of thought provocative mesmorization as your view the credits.

    Enjoy this movie and see what happens to you at the end.
    8tabuno

    A Nice Period Drama with a Time Travel Theme

    19 August 2016. This English production offers up a period drama with a science fiction theme as background. As such, this movie is not a thriller or adventure or action movie. In a similar way that Safety Not Guaranteed (2012) or Some Where in Time (1980) involved time travel but focused more on the journey than the travel through time, Dimensions is more a romantic drama with a sense of emotional mission, purpose, and even loss. It has the period trapping found in the English production of The First Men in the Moon (1964) or American production of The Time Machine (1980). Yet it is probably best reflective of Australia's Peter Weller's period piece Picnic at Hanging Rock (1975) which contained the same quality set design and costumes and the same quality photography and setting experience. While it doesn't quite have the sustained air of mystery as Picnic at Hanging Rock, there is a both rather poignant romantic climax as well as a more defined resolution.
    10travis-lowe

    Excellent Movie If you have an open mind

    First things first! Do not take the negative reviews of this movie and dodge watching this!! Unless you are a close minded fool who can't use an imagination this movie is great. If you cannot open up to sci-fi fantasies such as this do yourself a favor and quit watching sci-fi.

    With that said...

    This movie is an excellent thought provoking film that really gets the gears turning. It does a great job of putting theoretical time travel into perspective while doing so in a way that isn't too geeky or brain melting.

    It was actually better than I had expected and deserves a better score than it got. Don't expect lots of action scenes or crazy super futuristic technology that blows your mind but rather philosophical theories of time and space and the personal implications that they have on relationships.

    This movie is definitely not one where you can anticipate whats coming next and has a few twists that keep it very interesting.

    Overall an amazing film that should have received much more attention that it got. Being an avid movie lover that has blazed through netflix and other movie services I was surprised to have not seen or even heard of this one until fall 2014.

    More like this

    Donovan's Echo
    6.2
    Donovan's Echo
    I'll Follow You Down
    6.1
    I'll Follow You Down
    Hush Money
    5.8
    Hush Money
    Archive
    6.4
    Archive
    Thrill Seekers
    5.8
    Thrill Seekers
    Edge of Extinction
    5.0
    Edge of Extinction
    In the Lost Lands
    4.7
    In the Lost Lands
    Quanta
    4.7
    Quanta
    E.M.P.: 333 Days
    5.1
    E.M.P.: 333 Days
    Coyote Lake
    5.4
    Coyote Lake
    Paradox
    4.6
    Paradox
    Paradox
    6.1
    Paradox

    Related interests

    Naomie Harris, Mahershala Ali, Janelle Monáe, André Holland, Herman Caheej McGloun, Edson Jean, Alex R. Hibbert, and Tanisha Cidel in Moonlight (2016)
    Drama
    James Earl Jones and David Prowse in Star Wars: Episode V - The Empire Strikes Back (1980)
    Sci-Fi

    Storyline

    Edit

    Did you know

    Edit
    • Trivia
      Although the first and last scenes appear to be identical, there are lots of small differences as they are actually only similar events in two different timelines.

    Top picks

    Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
    Sign in

    FAQ15

    • How long is Dimensions?Powered by Alexa

    Details

    Edit
    • Release date
      • March 9, 2013 (United States)
    • Country of origin
      • United Kingdom
    • Official site
      • Official site
    • Language
      • English
    • Also known as
      • Dimensions: A Line, a Loop, a Tangle of Threads
    • Filming locations
      • Cambridge University, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, England, UK
    • Production company
      • Sculptures of Dazzling Complexity
    • See more company credits at IMDbPro

    Box office

    Edit
    • Budget
      • £100,000 (estimated)
    See detailed box office info on IMDbPro

    Tech specs

    Edit
    • Runtime
      • 1h 41m(101 min)
    • Color
      • Color
    • Aspect ratio
      • 2.35 : 1

    Contribute to this page

    Suggest an edit or add missing content
    • Learn more about contributing
    Edit page

    More to explore

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.