IMDb RATING
5.2/10
7.7K
YOUR RATING
Jo, Max, Gwen, and Dave win a competition for a luxurious Jet trip but face danger as their lives are threatened during the in-flight entertainment gaming experience.Jo, Max, Gwen, and Dave win a competition for a luxurious Jet trip but face danger as their lives are threatened during the in-flight entertainment gaming experience.Jo, Max, Gwen, and Dave win a competition for a luxurious Jet trip but face danger as their lives are threatened during the in-flight entertainment gaming experience.
5.27.7K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
Entertaining enough to give it a go! ;)
Original concept, but it is a little similar to SAW, also the ' Frog voice' ,... hehe,
but more pleasant to watch , with less blood and torture!
Not bad at all for a low budget thriller/horrisch movie. And the actors are not bad either.
Pushes the right buttons
Despite some of the marketing, Chris Crow's zeitgeisty paranoia thriller owes as much if not more to Hitchcock's Lifeboat as it does to modern "torture porn", such as the Saw sequels. This is a slow-burning, character-based ensemble piece, tightly written and unfussily directed, which takes our web-based fears and makes them monstrously manifest; not only our anxiety about identity theft, but also touching upon our perceived anonymity, leading as it does to a sense of invulnerability - and from behind that veil, the screenwriters suggest, we are free to act upon our cruellest base desires with virtual immunity.
Inevitably, perhaps, the tension gives way to more visceral final act, but Crow's camera never lingers or leers. The 18 certificate (in the UK) seems harsh, given the recent, similarly-budgeted excesses of Tom Six and Srðan Spasojeviæ, from which this is a mercifully far cry.
One may well be left with the feeling that this is a desperately topical film, cashing in on the current trends for horror games and social networking - and this is not an unreasonable response. But there is real quality here, not least in the four central performances, superbly depicting the rapid mental decline as the dire situation dawns: that they've been given the trip of a lifetime, and it looks like it'll be the last of their lives. This descent could have been unconvincing, but as the laughter fades and the camera becomes unfixed, the effect is quite involving.
It's a pity that this kind of ingenious lo-fi horror is so often lost in the shadow of dismal Hollywood remakes. We can help right this wrong by supporting freshness and ingenuity where we see it.
Inevitably, perhaps, the tension gives way to more visceral final act, but Crow's camera never lingers or leers. The 18 certificate (in the UK) seems harsh, given the recent, similarly-budgeted excesses of Tom Six and Srðan Spasojeviæ, from which this is a mercifully far cry.
One may well be left with the feeling that this is a desperately topical film, cashing in on the current trends for horror games and social networking - and this is not an unreasonable response. But there is real quality here, not least in the four central performances, superbly depicting the rapid mental decline as the dire situation dawns: that they've been given the trip of a lifetime, and it looks like it'll be the last of their lives. This descent could have been unconvincing, but as the laughter fades and the camera becomes unfixed, the effect is quite involving.
It's a pity that this kind of ingenious lo-fi horror is so often lost in the shadow of dismal Hollywood remakes. We can help right this wrong by supporting freshness and ingenuity where we see it.
Awful! Awful! Awful!
I wanted to give it a 1/2 star instead of a full star, but I couldn't figure how to do it.
The premise seemed promising at the beginning, but everything started to fall off after about 15 minutes into the movie.
The acting is terrible; the characters aren't even remotely interesting. You can't sympathize or hate(for that matter) any of the characters.
The ending is absolutely meaningless! And when the credit rolls you involuntarily spit in your soda.
British cinema used to be great, but alas; it's gone Hollywood. We're all awaiting its return.
The premise seemed promising at the beginning, but everything started to fall off after about 15 minutes into the movie.
The acting is terrible; the characters aren't even remotely interesting. You can't sympathize or hate(for that matter) any of the characters.
The ending is absolutely meaningless! And when the credit rolls you involuntarily spit in your soda.
British cinema used to be great, but alas; it's gone Hollywood. We're all awaiting its return.
suspenseful thriller, Saw without the blood
This is a weird one to review, I mean, there's almost no blood in it and still I wouldn't advice it to kids to watch this flick. And it's easy to say that it is in the line of Saw, watch it, somebody giving orders to 4 players on a plane. It is Chris Crow his second attempt to make a full feature and for being filmed just on a plane he did a fine job. Due being less on horror I still kept watching what was really going on and I even laughed a bit with the inside joke about Big Brother.
The acting was really good and you start to know the 4 players in the beginning and you must admit that if you were in the same game you wouldn't like to reveal yourself. Everybody has his dark secrets and this is in fact were it's all about. It made me even think about the internet, it's a fact everything you do is being watched or registered on some server.
The story itself did have some twists but the end I personally didn't like. But at the end of the day, it is a suspense full thriller with some pieces of torture, I would say without offending somebody, if you can't stand the gore in Saw than watch this one.
Gore 1/5 Nudity 0/5 Effects 2/5 Story 3/5 Comedy 0/5
The acting was really good and you start to know the 4 players in the beginning and you must admit that if you were in the same game you wouldn't like to reveal yourself. Everybody has his dark secrets and this is in fact were it's all about. It made me even think about the internet, it's a fact everything you do is being watched or registered on some server.
The story itself did have some twists but the end I personally didn't like. But at the end of the day, it is a suspense full thriller with some pieces of torture, I would say without offending somebody, if you can't stand the gore in Saw than watch this one.
Gore 1/5 Nudity 0/5 Effects 2/5 Story 3/5 Comedy 0/5
Not bad !
That kind of movie (a bunch of people stuck in a small location) is always a gamble. Every actor has to be good, the story must be interesting and well written, the director must know where he's going. You can't hide an empty script or anything else behind some great camera work, an amazing location or a celebrity among the actors.
In that case, I have to say: well done !
It's not a great movie but it's a good one, which is impressive considering its kind and the fact that it's a low budget.
In that case, I have to say: well done !
It's not a great movie but it's a good one, which is impressive considering its kind and the fact that it's a low budget.
Did you know
- TriviaThe jet is owned by "Deppart" Airlines - which is "Trapped" spelled backwards.
- GoofsAt around 43 mins, after a monitor is placed on the floor and while someone says "no no no no no" the boom mic is fully visible at the bottom of the screen.
- ConnectionsReferences 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)
- How long is Panic Button?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Panic Button: Massacre at 30,000 Feet
- Filming locations
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- £300,000 (estimated)
- Runtime
- 1h 36m(96 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.35 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content





