IMDb RATING
7.3/10
4.7K
YOUR RATING
Three characters of different social classes escape their unfinished painting in search of the Painter, hoping he will complete it.Three characters of different social classes escape their unfinished painting in search of the Painter, hoping he will complete it.Three characters of different social classes escape their unfinished painting in search of the Painter, hoping he will complete it.
- Awards
- 2 wins & 3 nominations total
JB Blanc
- The Painter
- (English version)
- (voice)
- …
Steve Blum
- Self-Portrait
- (English version)
- (voice)
Colin DePaula
- Gum
- (English version)
- (voice)
Wayne Grayson
- Quill
- (English version)
- (voice)
- (as Vinnie Penna)
Jason Griffith
- Additional Voice
- (English version)
- (voice)
Christopher Kromer
- Gray Morgen
- (English version)
- (voice)
Mary Elizabeth McGlynn
- Florence
- (English version)
- (voice)
Kamali Minter
- Lola
- (English version)
- (voice)
Dave B. Mitchell
- Pierrot
- (English version)
- (voice)
- …
Featured reviews
This animated movie is a good surprise.
With an innovative setting - a painting, it is filled with the intention to speak about art and creation. The animation by itself area celebration of the old handmade classics vs the new 3D-computerized trend. It reminds me a bit of "Le roi et l'oiseau" in some ways. Plus, of course, a few well-known painters through different figures.
That common theme, art and creation, is kept intellegently the whole movie - thanks to the painting first and then the search of the painter, and, thus, the meaning of a piece and its future.
Fortunately, the movie doesn't stop there and adds a layer for the adults in depicting a layer society - here based on the care you were getting from the painter - not too far from ours.
Finally, there is adventure, that makes it a movie for everyone.
Not everything is perfect though and I do agree with some reviewers pointing some weak moments (I would also have loved some "Alice in Wonderland" crazyness) and weak characters that pales in front of their quest. Would have ended it before too.
But these weaknesses are not that big they will prevent you enjoying this movie.
Not everything is perfect though and I do agree with some reviewers pointing some weak moments (I would also have loved some "Alice in Wonderland" crazyness) and weak characters that pales in front of their quest. Would have ended it before too.
But these weaknesses are not that big they will prevent you enjoying this movie.
Fantastic visuals, simply riveting with a perfectly executed structure. However, in my opinion it never reached it's full potential because it was held back. The film possessed a wonderful world without really exploring and explaining it in full detail, perhaps the director was not daring enough to go above and beyond in terms of the story line. Once the story was introduced, it struggled to maintain it's structural appeal. Though it contained a sensationally unique and stylistic appeal captivating the general audience. Despite the simple story it is a work bursting with imagination whether it be in art direction or its dazzling picture-hopping set piece.
a beautiful film. not complex script. not extraordinary story. but the memory of colors, the lovely simplicity, the freshness warm flavor of childhood, the emotions who are mixture of old images, adventure spirit, religious lesson and philosophical crumbs is like a kind of music. the result - an useful meeting. seductive, refreshing, delicate, a not ordinary animation who represents more than entertainment, a window to a splendid universe. the sense of well known world, the game of colors, the animation as a kind of delicate invitation to self discover are virtues of a film with not high ambitions but for this reason admirable way to remember the basic fundamental things.
good animation. or religious film. original characters. and seductive lesson about art. it has different sides. but it remains a beautiful show. not only for the wonderful art, for the wise mixture of love, tension, mystery and crumbs of history, for references to literature and history, for the final meeting or for the status of parable. but for its admirable manner to translate emotions and realities and desires. for the game of events and for the need of certitude of characters. for idealism. and for the grace of details. a film who remains different. for the science to explore old things in the inspired light. nothing more. only a story, a trip and a revelation. few characters. and the questions. short, one of stories who remains seductive for the art to reuse old problems in the right style.
The Painting (2011)
If you like animated films in general, and like inventive ones in particular, see this. I think it's good on many levels—the story, the style, the feeling. Even the sentimental ending.
But my taste for animation varies wildly. I loved "Monsters, Inc." and hated "Pocahontas." Anime leaves me cold. It isn't enough to dazzle me with animation tricks, nor to play with children's stories in inventive ways on screen.
So this story works with lots of familiar (too familiar) tropes—types of friends, heroes, problems that we know well. The animation (French) is different than both Pixar and Disney styles we know well, and also different than, say Wallace and Gromit (which wasn't American). But it isn't self-sustaining. I mean, it's a little constrained and polite, even when it is taking visual chances. It's all very "nice" all the time, and that goes with the friendly quality of the movie, too.
I sound like a curmudgeon. Not so (I think)! But I tried and tried to get absorbed and just got, well, bored. Sad to say. Judge for yourself. I will say that I think you need to give it a half an hour or so to get into some of the range of the film. But then, if it hasn't hooked you, it probably won't.
If you like animated films in general, and like inventive ones in particular, see this. I think it's good on many levels—the story, the style, the feeling. Even the sentimental ending.
But my taste for animation varies wildly. I loved "Monsters, Inc." and hated "Pocahontas." Anime leaves me cold. It isn't enough to dazzle me with animation tricks, nor to play with children's stories in inventive ways on screen.
So this story works with lots of familiar (too familiar) tropes—types of friends, heroes, problems that we know well. The animation (French) is different than both Pixar and Disney styles we know well, and also different than, say Wallace and Gromit (which wasn't American). But it isn't self-sustaining. I mean, it's a little constrained and polite, even when it is taking visual chances. It's all very "nice" all the time, and that goes with the friendly quality of the movie, too.
I sound like a curmudgeon. Not so (I think)! But I tried and tried to get absorbed and just got, well, bored. Sad to say. Judge for yourself. I will say that I think you need to give it a half an hour or so to get into some of the range of the film. But then, if it hasn't hooked you, it probably won't.
Did you know
- TriviaThe graphic style of the animation references several French painters, among which Henri Matisse, André Derain and Pierre Bonnard.
- How long is The Painting?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Le tableau
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Gross US & Canada
- $21,008
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $3,626
- May 12, 2013
- Gross worldwide
- $22,313
- Runtime
- 1h 20m(80 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content