Are You There, Chelsea?
- TV Series
- 2012
- 30m
IMDb RATING
5.0/10
4.5K
YOUR RATING
A comedy about a 20-something woman based loosely on the outrageous number one best-selling book by Chelsea Handler.A comedy about a 20-something woman based loosely on the outrageous number one best-selling book by Chelsea Handler.A comedy about a 20-something woman based loosely on the outrageous number one best-selling book by Chelsea Handler.
Browse episodes
Featured reviews
Yawn!! Very disappointing comedy sitcom. There is nothing new written here just a lot of smutty corny jokes. It was flat and unlaughable.
Though I really like Laura Prepon and she was great in 'The 70's Show' she was not good in this. Whoever wrote this has no humour whatsoever!! Its disgusting and shaming to revert to toilet humour to try and get some laughs... they are NOT FUNNY at all. Its cheap, nasty, and badly written and acted.
And so fed up with seeing young women act like mindless bimbo's.
For goodness sake, keep this rubbish off the TV and give us something way better then filthy jokes.
The decor in her apartment was more interesting.
Though I really like Laura Prepon and she was great in 'The 70's Show' she was not good in this. Whoever wrote this has no humour whatsoever!! Its disgusting and shaming to revert to toilet humour to try and get some laughs... they are NOT FUNNY at all. Its cheap, nasty, and badly written and acted.
And so fed up with seeing young women act like mindless bimbo's.
For goodness sake, keep this rubbish off the TV and give us something way better then filthy jokes.
The decor in her apartment was more interesting.
It's unfortunate that the network made the mistake of thinking they needed a young twenty something to make this show marketable.
Chelsea Handler has a rather unique ill-reverent comedy style that is as much about her demeanor as it is about the jokes.
Laura Prepon is absolutely nothing like Chelsea. The timing and delivery of the material is twisted into something completely different. Ms. Prepon has struggled to recapture her success on "That 70s Show"
In this critics opinion Her problem is two fold. She is far more ascetically attractive than she is talented. Perhaps she would do better as a "picture" model. That way we could enjoy her beauty without having to listen to her unflattering...(mannish?) voice.
This show might be saved if instead of having Prepon as the lead, they could write the story from the older sister's point of view. The older sister played by Chelsea Handler. That way Handler could carry the show the way it should have been presented in the first place.
Chelsea Handler has a rather unique ill-reverent comedy style that is as much about her demeanor as it is about the jokes.
Laura Prepon is absolutely nothing like Chelsea. The timing and delivery of the material is twisted into something completely different. Ms. Prepon has struggled to recapture her success on "That 70s Show"
In this critics opinion Her problem is two fold. She is far more ascetically attractive than she is talented. Perhaps she would do better as a "picture" model. That way we could enjoy her beauty without having to listen to her unflattering...(mannish?) voice.
This show might be saved if instead of having Prepon as the lead, they could write the story from the older sister's point of view. The older sister played by Chelsea Handler. That way Handler could carry the show the way it should have been presented in the first place.
I was also bummed with this show. I was expecting Chelsea Handler to be the main character, but Laura Prepon is. I think Laura can be funny, but they need to chill out with the sexual innuendos. Sex talk ALL. THE. TIME. is not that funny. This was the second pilot I watched this week and all it was about was sex. After awhile, it becomes tasteless. Writers, can you not come up with anything original?
The character Nikki, I believe her name is Natasha Leggero, is completely annoying, not funny. She was in the short-lived Free Agents and played the same type of annoying character. I think her appearances on the show could grind it into the ground even more.
This should could have potential, but without more of Chelsea Handler acting like herself, I don't see it happening.
The character Nikki, I believe her name is Natasha Leggero, is completely annoying, not funny. She was in the short-lived Free Agents and played the same type of annoying character. I think her appearances on the show could grind it into the ground even more.
This should could have potential, but without more of Chelsea Handler acting like herself, I don't see it happening.
I find this new brand of sitcom, a la Whitney, to be most unimpressive.
No matter what you think of these botoxed femmes, in terms of their stand-up routines, this scripted pap doesn't translate well.
In short, the jokes are nothing we haven't heard too many times, before. It appears the writers have supplanted genuine cleverness, humor and wit, with trying to "shock" people, by pushing the boundaries of decency.
Don't get me wrong; some of the best comedy in history has pushed the boundaries of social ideals of "decency", in the past. HOWEVER – those comedies did so with a purpose. They often challenged our sensibilities and old ways of thinking with unique, clever or thoughtful ways. Conversely, shows like Whitney and Chelsea seem to just try to make the audience say "I can't believe she said that" in social realms, which are already loose and maybe a bit crass. Crass is no substitute for clever.
Anti-intellectualism is taking hold in shows like this.
No matter what you think of these botoxed femmes, in terms of their stand-up routines, this scripted pap doesn't translate well.
In short, the jokes are nothing we haven't heard too many times, before. It appears the writers have supplanted genuine cleverness, humor and wit, with trying to "shock" people, by pushing the boundaries of decency.
Don't get me wrong; some of the best comedy in history has pushed the boundaries of social ideals of "decency", in the past. HOWEVER – those comedies did so with a purpose. They often challenged our sensibilities and old ways of thinking with unique, clever or thoughtful ways. Conversely, shows like Whitney and Chelsea seem to just try to make the audience say "I can't believe she said that" in social realms, which are already loose and maybe a bit crass. Crass is no substitute for clever.
Anti-intellectualism is taking hold in shows like this.
All I want to know is why? Chelsea, you are better than this, almost anything is better than this. I never thought I would see the day that Chelsea Handler/her life would be as funny as getting a flat tire on the highway. I am a die hard Chelsea Handler fan, don't get me wrong. I have read all her books, watched her other shows, but she managed to completely lose me on this one. While some of the jokes were funny, Laura Prepon just doesn't cut it as the boozy, witty, and offensive Chelsea. If Handler actually played herself the show would probably be just as hilarious as any one of her best selling books. Shame on you casting director for picking the wrong actress, and shame on you Chelsea for letting this happen.
Sincerely, Disappointed
Sincerely, Disappointed
Did you know
- TriviaWilmer Valderrama and Josh Meyers also appeared alongside Laura Prepon in That 70's Show.
- How many seasons does Are You There, Chelsea? have?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Are You There, Vodka? It's Me, Chelsea
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content