Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysToronto Int'l Film FestivalHispanic Heritage MonthIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
Back
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
  • FAQ
IMDbPro
Brandon Sklenar in 1923 (2022)

Review by ima_curiousangel-742-386404

1923

3/10

Nowhere near as good as 1883 or yellowstone .

Despite a superb cast the writing in this is lazy and the storyline flimsy at best. Helen Mirren Harrison Ford and the other leads play their roles well but are given little to work with and the story barely meanders. We watched the glorious 1883 prequel last week and expected the same level of intensity, quality and pure cinematic joy of this (despite the sorrowful parts). However 1923 has been sexually gratuitous regularly at best and we ended up playing count the nip by episode 3. It seemed that everytime they couldn't figure out how to tell part of the story someone was naked and and it became a genuine and surprising disappointment. Neither of us are prudes but when that's the only thing they can think of to fit into 5 minutes an episode instead of decent story arc dialogue or something to move the history of the ranch towards its more current state we honestly almost gave up hope. A couple of terrible accents by relative newcomers and moments of shouting "SERIOUSLY????" at the screen and I'm not sure we will bother with series 2. We may try thr first 1st episode but truthfully if this is what 160 million gets them, they've been swindled. 1883 had so much depth and heart even in its brutal moments it puts this to shame. As does the acting and effort put in by the first series cast. It makes this look empty and truly sad. We gave it its all 8 episodes but with no conclusion at any point only open ended half arsed stories , none really fully connected it was an absolute let down. Watch it if you wish bit don't expect to be satisfied or enthralled. I hope they use their screen time better next time.
  • ima_curiousangel-742-386404
  • Jul 29, 2024

More from this title

More to explore

Recently viewed

Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
Get the IMDb App
Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
Follow IMDb on social
Get the IMDb App
For Android and iOS
Get the IMDb App
  • Help
  • Site Index
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • License IMDb Data
  • Press Room
  • Advertising
  • Jobs
  • Conditions of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, an Amazon company

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.