The Island President

This is movie is a PR effort helping him to win Nobel Peace Prize. He was ousted by his own people in 3 years like Hosni Mubarak and Gazzafi.

His total presidency was a drama filled lies and lies. I am sure we westerners are more civilized than a third world countries.

I doubt any ethical person will buy a ticket for this movie when this movie was funded secretly from tax payers money. Maldives is a very small country with limited resources and its ousted president want to become a Hollywood celebrity. I see no difference than the Saudi Royal Family and Him.

No offense to his loyal supporters.

I actually just watched a 'fiction' movie, 'Ocean's Rising' (2017). Apart from the bad acting, the scientific information accurately reflected what 'The Island President' is trying to get the rest of the planet to pay attention. He's got mine. I already am concerned and do what I've been capable of doing to diminish the effects of climate change. It is time to up my game!!

The Documentary was very well directed and presented. It portrays the important events that took place in Mohamed Nasheed's life as a child and as a politician, and his 'sudden' movement towards environment. It would made us think the how vulnerable the Maldivian life actually is!

The Island President is hardly a PowerPoint presentation on the subject of environmental responsibility. That's already been done well enough. Instead, This Documentary tackles the message from a compelling human- interest angle -- by focusing on the messenger.

It was far more entertaining and less didactic than An Inconvenient Truth, with beautiful scenery of Indian Ocean captured with bird-view camera angles both in stills and amazing time-lapses.

A must watch for all environment lovers.

UPDATE: Here's a spoiler for you. This film was produced 8 years ago and the island is still there.

I am moving my rating from a 1 to a 2 based on the cinematography, otherwise I would look for something below 1. Had the director chosen to tell the story of a 'man-gone-mad', then that might have been interesting but this dribble is just another propaganda film for the environmental movement.

What perplexes me is the assertion "the main island has lost 5 meters of beach front and that Manhattan Island is also at the same depth". Here's an inconvenient truth for you- ALL ISLANDS ARE AT SEA LEVEL! Here's another obvious fact that might present an obstacle to thinking people. Sometimes beaches erode because of ocean volatility and their lack of protection from the elements. Sometimes the plates of the earth sift and islands sink and sometimes islands rise because volcanoes erupt under the sea. There are a number of reasons that an island can experience beach erosion so why not explore all the reasons before jumping on one concept because it supports what uneducated people want to hear.

I love the passion of President Nasheed but it's passion misplaced. Passion for passion sake is acceptable for a child but for a grown man it is simply naive. If you think "An Inconvenient Truth" was science based then you'll love this film. If you see the hypocrisy of Al Gore purchasing beach front property in California then you might want to avoid this film.

In 1973 George Kukla and my then-hero Carl Sagan predicted catastrophe from global.........COOLING. A scant 8 years later the same Science guys flipped into global.....WARMING. Okay, I get it, personal "funding needs" change global climate "facts". A lot of people wonder how "cooling" morphed to "warming" morphed to "man made climate change" (and now, weirdly, just "climate change", a sort of secret hand shake short hand..). There was a period of time when journalists, and even main stream scientists, were asking inconvenient questions. For the most part, that has ceased, since they got THE MEMO.

Now, I have two horses in this game: 1. Algore's predictions that Manhattan would be under water by 10 years ago filled me with a kind of Biblical scrubbing bubbles hope. Obviously there have been dozens of similar predictions, but his were arguably the best publicized, and, heck, he is likable. So, yeah, I was rooting for rising sea levels. Sue me. 2. Oceanic and air pollution, deforestation, poisoning of fresh water sources, and a host of other lamentable, provable man made effects are very real, and, curiously, get almost no play. The international community could halt the destruction of the Amazon Basin in an afternoon. When was the last time you heard ANYTHING about the Amazon? So...linking dicey climate models and falsified data (remember climate-gate?) with other REAL stuff has resulted, inevitably, in global paralysis on ALL the issues. A person could argue that films like this are part of the problem, and not part of the solution.