IMDb RATING
7.0/10
2.9K
YOUR RATING
A professor in the film department at a provincial university goes to Seoul to meet his senior, who works as a film critic, and stays in a northern Seoul village for three days.A professor in the film department at a provincial university goes to Seoul to meet his senior, who works as a film critic, and stays in a northern Seoul village for three days.A professor in the film department at a provincial university goes to Seoul to meet his senior, who works as a film critic, and stays in a northern Seoul village for three days.
- Awards
- 3 wins & 5 nominations total
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Same guy, same place, same characters, but different combinations. Same day? Maybe. Is this the same day in different combinations, or different days that show how utterly repetitive life is? There is room for debate there. If you've ever kept a diary over a period of years, then gone back to read them, the most shocking thing that many people find is not how much they've changed, but how much they haven't. You make similar decisions and similar mistakes. The situations are always slightly different, with some minor variable, but the results end up in the same place. This film is an examination of that idea. It's may not be for popular tastes, but it's good stuff, reminiscent of Eric Rohmer and the French New Wave.
The fine line between art and nonsense has been crossed in this movie. In terms of script it is on the level of an average TV drama. However, even a viewer with basic knowledge of cinema would notice awkward framing. Endless shots with flood of dialogue show authors ambition to portrait authentic situations from everyday life. But when in one of them the camera guided by an unapt hand first swings and then zooms in without any connection to the scene, i lost the sympathy for this movie.
The main character is somewhat lovable and obviously in some kind of introspective dwelling (writer's block, mid-life crisis or simply boredom). The most interesting moments are when he meets other people and the way they react to him, since he is a famous author.
Watch only if you're a movie buff.
The main character is somewhat lovable and obviously in some kind of introspective dwelling (writer's block, mid-life crisis or simply boredom). The most interesting moments are when he meets other people and the way they react to him, since he is a famous author.
Watch only if you're a movie buff.
Joon-Sang Yoo arrives in Seoul. He has directed four movies, but they weren't popular. Now he teaches in a country school. He's in town to meet with an old friend, Sang-Jung Kim. They go to a bar, have a bit of a chat, meet with the owner who rushes n to apologize for not being there. Then the day starts to repeat, with variations.
At first I thought it was just a variation on GROUNDHOG DAY, but as time went on, I realized that it was the portrait of a man who had given up, and had become unmoored from reality. He keeps trying to get the day right, like the director he used to be -- one character, on learning he used to direct, asks "What's it like to not direct?" -- but whatever he does, no matter what he accomplishes, he finds at the end that he is where he was at the beginning, repeating the day with variations that have no effect on his fellow characters. If they had not known him when he was a director, they have no memory of him, and only the vaguest of effects on their lives.
It's creepy and sad and simply told, in elegant black and white photography. The writer/director, Sang-soo Hong is called by some "The Woody Allen of Korea." Martin Scorsese says of his movies that "everything kind of starts unassumingly - but then things unpeel like an orange". This movie fits that description. I'll keep an eye out for more of his movies.
At first I thought it was just a variation on GROUNDHOG DAY, but as time went on, I realized that it was the portrait of a man who had given up, and had become unmoored from reality. He keeps trying to get the day right, like the director he used to be -- one character, on learning he used to direct, asks "What's it like to not direct?" -- but whatever he does, no matter what he accomplishes, he finds at the end that he is where he was at the beginning, repeating the day with variations that have no effect on his fellow characters. If they had not known him when he was a director, they have no memory of him, and only the vaguest of effects on their lives.
It's creepy and sad and simply told, in elegant black and white photography. The writer/director, Sang-soo Hong is called by some "The Woody Allen of Korea." Martin Scorsese says of his movies that "everything kind of starts unassumingly - but then things unpeel like an orange". This movie fits that description. I'll keep an eye out for more of his movies.
I love this kind of movies, i mean, movies with people talking and talking like there is no tomorrow and simultaneously, they are seemingly looking for love when, in reality, they are just looking to find themselves. Holywood has created the best by far movies of this genre, and i don't love Holywood recently. French cinema has his share but their movies don't hold a candle to American comedy/drama/romance movies.
I am so biased that i could easily overrate a movie like this.
THE DAY HE ARRIVES is a flawed movie. I have to be honest, dialogue feels a bit clumsy at times. Some reactions feel awkward. Maybe there is a cultural barrier that i can't break, maybe this is the way Korean people communicate to each other. In any case, this didn't feel much natural at times. But still, it was a joy to watch. I could easily watch another hour this leading character facing his personal dead-ends and emotional struggles. I empathized with him. Most of the time, it felt realistic. And i loved this "GROUNDHOG DAY" aspect, whatever it was. I loved the subtleties here as well. Some things were never told. Maybe i am wrong but i think i understood them.
In any case, this is not as good as Allen or Linklater. But still, it was good. At least, for its genre.
I am so biased that i could easily overrate a movie like this.
THE DAY HE ARRIVES is a flawed movie. I have to be honest, dialogue feels a bit clumsy at times. Some reactions feel awkward. Maybe there is a cultural barrier that i can't break, maybe this is the way Korean people communicate to each other. In any case, this didn't feel much natural at times. But still, it was a joy to watch. I could easily watch another hour this leading character facing his personal dead-ends and emotional struggles. I empathized with him. Most of the time, it felt realistic. And i loved this "GROUNDHOG DAY" aspect, whatever it was. I loved the subtleties here as well. Some things were never told. Maybe i am wrong but i think i understood them.
In any case, this is not as good as Allen or Linklater. But still, it was good. At least, for its genre.
I'm a big fan of South Korean cinema, particularly their action thrillers, their horror films, and the art-house movies of Kim Ki-Duk, a guy who's quickly becoming one of my favourite directors. Unfortunately THE DAY HE ARRIVES is a low budget, black-and-white, arty production shot on the streets of Seoul with very little story to propel it along.
The narrative seems to involve a down-on-his-luck former director who revisits some of his old friends in the city during a long weekend. Many of the events that transpire are repetitive, with lots of piano playing, drunkenness, and visits to various restaurants and bars, but there's not really much point to this and zero explanation. There's no discernible beginning, middle or end, either. It feels like the work of a first-time director just finding his feet and asking the viewer to endure with him.
THE DAY HE ARRIVES contains lots of endless ad-libbed scenes with static camera-work. The performances are the only good thing about this; the rest of it is a bore. I was thinking this might be some GROUNDHOG DAY time loop style movie but it's far more subtle and obtuse than that, and by the time it finishes the only thing you can do is scratch your head and move on to the next movie.
The narrative seems to involve a down-on-his-luck former director who revisits some of his old friends in the city during a long weekend. Many of the events that transpire are repetitive, with lots of piano playing, drunkenness, and visits to various restaurants and bars, but there's not really much point to this and zero explanation. There's no discernible beginning, middle or end, either. It feels like the work of a first-time director just finding his feet and asking the viewer to endure with him.
THE DAY HE ARRIVES contains lots of endless ad-libbed scenes with static camera-work. The performances are the only good thing about this; the rest of it is a bore. I was thinking this might be some GROUNDHOG DAY time loop style movie but it's far more subtle and obtuse than that, and by the time it finishes the only thing you can do is scratch your head and move on to the next movie.
Did you know
- Crazy creditsThe opening credits are in color.
- How long is The Day He Arrives?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Gross US & Canada
- $13,746
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $3,311
- Apr 22, 2012
- Gross worldwide
- $323,073
- Runtime
- 1h 19m(79 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content