Netflix missed a great story with a bad narration.
I watched the entire story as I was in college during 2003 and the fear of him being escaped from jail was clearly visible.
My views here are
1. It fails to show how police department were in dark with such psychos at that time, he came out of nowhere and his crimes were beyond the sense at that time. (Include Dandupalya Gang)
2. It fails to probe the psychic mentality of the man, how few monsters are in our society and what their thinking is.
3. The failure of judicial system is not shown at all, except for the final Lady Judge, all other were equally responsible for his release.
4. It should have should how the police department did try to eventually convict him in these cases.
And finally why were these two "women panelists" called at the end targetting masculinity of men? Is it a norm for Netflix.
My views here are
1. It fails to show how police department were in dark with such psychos at that time, he came out of nowhere and his crimes were beyond the sense at that time. (Include Dandupalya Gang)
2. It fails to probe the psychic mentality of the man, how few monsters are in our society and what their thinking is.
3. The failure of judicial system is not shown at all, except for the final Lady Judge, all other were equally responsible for his release.
4. It should have should how the police department did try to eventually convict him in these cases.
And finally why were these two "women panelists" called at the end targetting masculinity of men? Is it a norm for Netflix.
- nsharathchandra
- Dec 31, 2022