Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysToronto Int'l Film FestivalHispanic Heritage MonthIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Time Lapse

  • 2014
  • Not Rated
  • 1h 44m
IMDb RATING
6.5/10
52K
YOUR RATING
Danielle Panabaker in Time Lapse (2014)
Trailer for Time Lapse
Play trailer1:55
1 Video
24 Photos
Time TravelMysterySci-FiThriller

Three friends discover a mysterious machine that takes pictures twenty-four hours into the future, and conspire to use it for personal gain, until disturbing and dangerous images begin to de... Read allThree friends discover a mysterious machine that takes pictures twenty-four hours into the future, and conspire to use it for personal gain, until disturbing and dangerous images begin to develop.Three friends discover a mysterious machine that takes pictures twenty-four hours into the future, and conspire to use it for personal gain, until disturbing and dangerous images begin to develop.

  • Director
    • Bradley King
  • Writers
    • Bradley King
    • Bp Cooper
  • Stars
    • Danielle Panabaker
    • Matt O'Leary
    • George Finn
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    6.5/10
    52K
    YOUR RATING
    • Director
      • Bradley King
    • Writers
      • Bradley King
      • Bp Cooper
    • Stars
      • Danielle Panabaker
      • Matt O'Leary
      • George Finn
    • 245User reviews
    • 104Critic reviews
    • 50Metascore
  • See production info at IMDbPro
    • Awards
      • 22 wins & 5 nominations total

    Videos1

    Time Lapse
    Trailer 1:55
    Time Lapse

    Photos23

    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    + 20
    View Poster

    Top cast11

    Edit
    Danielle Panabaker
    Danielle Panabaker
    • Callie
    Matt O'Leary
    Matt O'Leary
    • Finn
    George Finn
    George Finn
    • Jasper
    John Rhys-Davies
    John Rhys-Davies
    • Mr. Bezzerides
    • (scenes deleted)
    • (credit only)
    Amin Joseph
    Amin Joseph
    • Big Joe
    Jason Spisak
    Jason Spisak
    • Ivan
    Sharon Maughan
    Sharon Maughan
    • Dr. Heidecker
    David Figlioli
    David Figlioli
    • Marcus
    Judith Drake
    • Mrs. Anderson
    Mark C. Hanson
    • Dog Race Announcer
    • (voice)
    Dayci Brookshire
    Dayci Brookshire
    • Sharon
    • (uncredited)
    • Director
      • Bradley King
    • Writers
      • Bradley King
      • Bp Cooper
    • All cast & crew
    • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

    User reviews245

    6.551.9K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Featured reviews

    8whatch-17931

    Believe it or not, these characters aren't stupid, they are fated

    Well, not *unusually* stupid.

    Why doesn't Jasper put up winning lottery numbers instead of race results? Thus, avoiding dealing with the bookie and his henchman? Because he doesn't.

    They come up with this reasoning that they have to do what's in the photo of the future, else they'll die or something, which is rather dubious.

    But it doesn't matter what their reasoning is. These people are experiencing a self consistent time stream. They don't actually change anything at all. They have no free will. They are automatons. All their thoughts, reasoning, actions are written in stone.

    -

    I like it a lot and find it repeatedly engrossing. I've probably watched it at least ten times and am always sucked right into it.

    I think the acting is great, even Ivan, the bookie. He's pretty funny, and it seems not everybody is sold on him, but he works for me. He DOES come across like he's acting, but that's because the character is acting like he thinks a bookie should act.

    And for a low budget movie, the bulk of which occurs in one apartment, it looks great. I don't think it ever feels stale due to that, and that's no small feat.

    My only complaint from that department is when they discover the camera (a nice prop). The three leads look over at it, and it cuts to an insert of the camera, which is obviously an insert since the characters should have been visible.
    6SoumikBanerjee1996

    Why resort to familiar drama?

    A still camera that can peek ahead of time; is indeed a captivating idea, to begin with. On one hand, I feel obliged to show appreciation for the writer who has come up with such a tantalizing vision, on the other hand, I believe, the movie, on the whole, failed to give such a great concept a rightful shape & structure! It kinda falls short of attaining its full potential.

    And the main reason was the clueless facade of a write-up that didn't seem to have any idea whatsoever on how to deal with such a tricky subject. Although it started on an encouraging note, putting together justifiable moments in the process that were loaded with palpable tension and suspense but then after a certain period of time, everything began to fall apart.

    What started as a pretty straightforward Sci-fi, slowly turned into a familiar drama comprising of friendships, love, cheating; all the stuff that was nonessential, and uncalled for. Why would somebody resort to such paltry dramas where you've got one of the most intriguing concepts at your disposal, You have had a freaking time. Traveling camera for god sake. If only they were more pragmatic with their preferences, things could have turned out differently and that would have been in its favor as well.
    7kosmasp

    Clever and smart

    Or maybe neither, depending on your view or perspective on the matter or characters that is. But you can't deny, that this movie (clue is in the title), is well thought of. You might not agree with all the twists and turns this takes, but it does so convincingly. Can you see a couple of things coming before our main characters spot them (no pun intended)? Of course you can. Still fun to watch though.

    Which all comes down to a neat direction (for a low budget movie that is) and the stellar cast, that really do their best to convey a really "far out" idea. If you like Science Fiction Thrillers, that do use their head a little bit, you could do worse (a lot worse)
    7johnbkaramazov

    A Balanced Review

    I spent the first part of this film umming and ahing as to whether or not I was enjoying it, but towards the end I was totally gripped and at the end I absolutely loved it.

    The story and pacing of this film are practically perfect, making it a definite winner in my book, but any prospective viewers might benefit from being aware of a couple of things before they decide to watch.

    Firstly it looks kind of like a cheap made for TV movie. Some of the camera shots are creative and well thought out but the whole thing just oozes film-making on a budget, and some people might find that hard to get past.

    The style reminded me of the remake they did of The Outer Limits in the 90s, rather than a film from 2014. Also, much like the aforementioned series the incidental music is horribly generic and uninspired (but thankfully used pretty sparsely.) The acting is mediocre from the three leads. Some people will find this grating, so prepare yourself. They won't be winning any Academy Awards anytime soon for their performances, trust me.

    So why should you definitely watch this movie? Because despite the clunky dialogue and wooden acting the plot is entertaining, unfolds brilliantly and is executed just about as perfectly as a plot can be executed in a movie. It is a wonderfully self-contained story that builds to a satisfying denouement and keeps you guessing and totally gripped along the way.

    If you go into this movie expecting every aspect to be amazing, you're probably going to be disappointed. Instead bear in mind the criticisms above and trust that despite these weaknesses it is an uncommonly enjoyable watch and well worth an hour and forty minutes of your time.
    7MovieSonic

    Good film, does what it's supposed to

    It entertains. It's not the best sci-fi film I've ever seen but it's reasonably high up the list and as a bonus, it keeps getting more interesting as it goes along and thankfully, the ending was fitting.

    A few suggestions for improvement:

    The characters all seemed like strangers in the beginning and they all waited a set time for their turn to speak which gave the film quite a stilted effect. George Finn was the only one who didn't 'look' like he was acting. Danielle Panabaker annoys me in most of her work because she tries to pull off being innocent and sweet when the character she's playing doesn't need it (either that or she just isn't any good at being 'sweet') - it comes across as being quite fake. The camera could have been expanded on for example; its creation, design, and they could have experimented with various settings. As it stands, I still don't know how they figured out certain things about the way it functioned (but I might have missed the explanation while munching).

    Some praise:

    Matt O'Leary pulled off a really funny 'wtf are you talking about' moment when his best friend and girlfriend were casually discussing a dead body. Although the opening scenes were jarring because of the lack of chemistry and low budget feel, with literally every scene, the film got more and more engrossing so stick with it. The story was really well written. It progressed at a good pace and although George Finn's character development seemed a bit over the top, I thoroughly enjoyed the film and for once, the ending was fitting and extremely satisfying.

    I think everyone involved should be really proud, any criticisms are fairly minor, and I can easily recommend this.

    7/10

    More like this

    Time Trap
    6.2
    Time Trap
    Project Almanac
    6.4
    Project Almanac
    Timecrimes
    7.1
    Timecrimes
    Triangle
    6.9
    Triangle
    ARQ
    6.3
    ARQ
    Coherence
    7.2
    Coherence
    Enter Nowhere
    6.5
    Enter Nowhere
    Exam
    6.7
    Exam
    Primer
    6.7
    Primer
    Timelapse
    6.4
    Timelapse
    Radius
    6.2
    Radius
    Predestination
    7.4
    Predestination

    Related interests

    Michael J. Fox and Christopher Lloyd in Back to the Future (1985)
    Time Travel
    Jack Nicholson and Faye Dunaway in Chinatown (1974)
    Mystery
    James Earl Jones and David Prowse in Star Wars: Episode V - The Empire Strikes Back (1980)
    Sci-Fi
    Cho Yeo-jeong in Parasite (2019)
    Thriller

    Storyline

    Edit

    Did you know

    Edit
    • Trivia
      The filmmakers entirely self-financed the movie, writing the script to fit the confines of their limited budget.
    • Goofs
      When Jasper installs a chain lock onto the front door, he installs it backwards, making it effectively useless.
    • Quotes

      Callie: Don't get caught at the window

    • Connections
      Referenced in Film Junk Podcast: Episode 520: Inside Out (2015)
    • Soundtracks
      Spider
      Written by Gary Conor McFarlane and Adam Edward Browne

      Performed by The Autumn Owls

      Courtesy of North Star Media, LLC

    Top picks

    Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
    Sign in

    FAQ18

    • How long is Time Lapse?Powered by Alexa

    Details

    Edit
    • Release date
      • May 15, 2015 (United States)
    • Country of origin
      • United States
    • Official sites
      • Official Facebook
      • Official site
    • Language
      • English
    • Also known as
      • Lapso de tiempo
    • Filming locations
      • Los Angeles, California, USA(discussed on DVD in Special Features)
    • Production companies
      • Royal Pictures
      • Uncooperative Pictures
      • Veritas Productions
    • See more company credits at IMDbPro

    Box office

    Edit
    • Gross worldwide
      • $19,572
    See detailed box office info on IMDbPro

    Tech specs

    Edit
    • Runtime
      • 1h 44m(104 min)
    • Color
      • Color
    • Aspect ratio
      • 1.85 : 1

    Contribute to this page

    Suggest an edit or add missing content
    • Learn more about contributing
    Edit page

    More to explore

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.