An investigative Journalist thinks she's found a killer, and breaks into his place to find the evidence. Only when he comes back it becomes a game of cat and mouse with deadly consequences.An investigative Journalist thinks she's found a killer, and breaks into his place to find the evidence. Only when he comes back it becomes a game of cat and mouse with deadly consequences.An investigative Journalist thinks she's found a killer, and breaks into his place to find the evidence. Only when he comes back it becomes a game of cat and mouse with deadly consequences.
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Ok, so it might seem a bit harsh giving this 1 star, especially as I'm British watching a Brit movie, but I feel obliged to help people avoid wasting their life watching this. I'll start with the good points. The actual sorry line as written in the initial Netflix bio make it sound watchable. Now for the not so good. The acting is pretty poor, and I'm being as nice as possible here. The direction is abysmal, the camera angles and closeness to the actors is worse than shocking, and finally the sound is so in and out, did the sound guy have matchstick arms and could not cope with the weight of the boom mic ? Trust me, this is one to avoid. I'll try and finish on a positive note though, if they'd used decent actors, and decent director, with decent equipment, it might have been ok ish.
The acting in this film is cringey, the storyline boring, there is no tension and the camera work is shockingly bad.
It's as though someone was allowed to submit their gcse coursework to Netflix. Avoid.
It's as though someone was allowed to submit their gcse coursework to Netflix. Avoid.
The movie was all but urban, very low quality and clearly made on low budget. Everything seemed to just happen so quickly yet so slowly (get what I mean?). It had an unusually dull mood and was quite predictable at times.
The 'horrific' moments seemed rather unconvincing and quite childish. Very simplistic. It doesn't get the viewer to fully understand and (perhaps) sympathize with the killer's actions.
It wasn't all bad though. In fact, overall the ideas were pretty good. I especially saw the ending quite interesting but still felt like it was one of those endings in which the director of the movie feels he/she failed viewers throughout the movie and decides to make up for it in the end.
It had a great environment and gave a feel of the regular neighborhood in England. However, ask me how I found this movie on a usual day, and the quickest answer I'd give you would probably come with the 'S' word.
The 'horrific' moments seemed rather unconvincing and quite childish. Very simplistic. It doesn't get the viewer to fully understand and (perhaps) sympathize with the killer's actions.
It wasn't all bad though. In fact, overall the ideas were pretty good. I especially saw the ending quite interesting but still felt like it was one of those endings in which the director of the movie feels he/she failed viewers throughout the movie and decides to make up for it in the end.
It had a great environment and gave a feel of the regular neighborhood in England. However, ask me how I found this movie on a usual day, and the quickest answer I'd give you would probably come with the 'S' word.
The Plot. An investigative Journalist thinks she's found a killer, and breaks into his place to find the evidence.
Only when he come's back it becomes a game of cat and mouse with deadly consequences.
As of this writing there is only one other review -- from someone who worked on the movie and give it an extraordinarily good review.
It's not a good movie.
It's very cheaply made and not especially well done. I mean if you are in college and you made this movie, OK, but it's just not professional.
Plus it's slow as molasses. And nothing about it is suspenseful.
Move on.
Only when he come's back it becomes a game of cat and mouse with deadly consequences.
As of this writing there is only one other review -- from someone who worked on the movie and give it an extraordinarily good review.
It's not a good movie.
It's very cheaply made and not especially well done. I mean if you are in college and you made this movie, OK, but it's just not professional.
Plus it's slow as molasses. And nothing about it is suspenseful.
Move on.
Bad dubbing, bad acting, bad photography, bad lighting, bad dialogue, and I'm only twenty minutes in. Looks like amateur actors didn't feel sure of themselves or the plot, which had a few holes. Police procedures, medical involvement and journalistic work stepped on each other's toes, and the cod portrayal of an "alternative personality" just grated. It looked like someone watched "Dexter" and thought they could do better. They didn't.
Did you know
- TriviaThe movie was shot in ten days.
- GoofsWhen the detective and Becky were talking in the bedroom she was leaning on the open door in head on shots and on the opposite door frame in mirror shots when he was talking.
- How long is Simon?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Budget
- Β£20,000 (estimated)
- Runtime
- 1h 20m(80 min)
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content