IMDb RATING
3.8/10
5.6K
YOUR RATING
A vision of augmented reality.A vision of augmented reality.A vision of augmented reality.
Featured reviews
If our lord hates this movie so do I. Movie bad you will fall asleep many times. This is all the kids do because goofy glasses and sit at tables. Stupid spy kids glass and ariel from the sonic series, ariel is a robot, wow ar is kind of cool but woah, but it's a hologram it like spinning a teapot, and they are here to save America, ok watch the kids do this and whatever, the are like nope and start killing the babysitters, and they kill the babysitters and they are evil. No one know what this movie is about, not even reddit. No plot, it's like AI wrote it, it like Attaway general wrote a horror movie. I would rather play death stranding start to finish in no siting. Colors good, go movie. Nothing about this is so bad it's good. It makes me angry to think about it. Hitting your shins with a hammer is a less painful and better way to spend your time.
This film has the best trailer I've seen in years, a good combination of lights, colors and funky music. Then as a British Horror enthusiast I was thrilled to see it was a British movie.
The praise stops there.
Three actors a mixture of talent, two good females one awful male actor, a warren of tunnels that are probably the same and the worst American accents ever. Everything was American, it was like it was pretending not to be a British movie, but it was.
The story is very "damned" similar, but that's also where that ends.
Unfortunately the story was just too awful, 45 minutes in I just couldn't go on, it was truly unbearable, boring and utterly tiresome. You could have slept through portions and not missed a thing.
So sad it was so bad, it could have been so good.
The praise stops there.
Three actors a mixture of talent, two good females one awful male actor, a warren of tunnels that are probably the same and the worst American accents ever. Everything was American, it was like it was pretending not to be a British movie, but it was.
The story is very "damned" similar, but that's also where that ends.
Unfortunately the story was just too awful, 45 minutes in I just couldn't go on, it was truly unbearable, boring and utterly tiresome. You could have slept through portions and not missed a thing.
So sad it was so bad, it could have been so good.
Three chaperones are hired to supervise an advanced learning program for gifted children, who wear Augmented Reality Glasses to assist in their education. Contained within a secure, underground facility, events quickly spiral out of control.
The film has received mixed or negative reviews, and I can absolutely see why. Even though the virtual reality parts look okay, the general appearance of the film is cheap. And much of the acting is awful (especially the really bad talking head in the opening). The concept is timely (something we might see on "Black Mirror"), but the film may be limited by its own budget.
Worth a look? Sure. But not nearly as good as the sort of new releases we have come to expect from IFC Midnight. (Then again, you can't have a winner every time, can you?)
The film has received mixed or negative reviews, and I can absolutely see why. Even though the virtual reality parts look okay, the general appearance of the film is cheap. And much of the acting is awful (especially the really bad talking head in the opening). The concept is timely (something we might see on "Black Mirror"), but the film may be limited by its own budget.
Worth a look? Sure. But not nearly as good as the sort of new releases we have come to expect from IFC Midnight. (Then again, you can't have a winner every time, can you?)
I am fairly easily pleased when it comes to movies, but this one became frustrating to watch with in the first 10 minutes.
What is wrong with it? The story. Everything else about the film was OK like the acting etc. but the story was just plain stupid.
When it started it was OK and logical, but it soon descended into a very poor storyline that seemed was financed because it could be made cheaply, regardless of content.
Really you would be better off watching the commercials.
What is wrong with it? The story. Everything else about the film was OK like the acting etc. but the story was just plain stupid.
When it started it was OK and logical, but it soon descended into a very poor storyline that seemed was financed because it could be made cheaply, regardless of content.
Really you would be better off watching the commercials.
Decent watch, if forgettable, at best, won't watch again, and can't recommend.
(Please keep in mind that the mobile app erased my original review, so I'm a little peeved.)
My biggest concern with this movie is that it concentrates on fear mongering against technology more than creating a good movie. I understand that it's supposed to be a psychological thriller, but that should be what you're concentrating on and not teaching the audience to fear technology: just tell the story.
In fairness, it did do a lot with a clearly low budget: low level actors you won't recognize and (mostly) kids for background characters, Google Glass (or similar) tech, an underground bunker setting, and not particularly great cg effects, but they managed to get by.
The real crux of the story is that isolated in a bunker, they kind of think they're going mad, so "what's real" comes into play, and then it becomes the inevitable question of "is it me or is the technology out to get me", and when that tech is a virtual OS (think Cortana), then there is no telling what is going to happen so there is no expectation, thus nothing to subvert. Its a rule in both Horror and Comedy to play with the audience's tension / expectation (Rules of 3) to establish a pattern, and then break/deliver on it in a surprising manner.
The camera work also messed with me quite a bit. Not only do you have a switch between natural 3rd person camera work and 1st person perspective, the camera work alternatives between almost imperceptively still and wildly jerk about as the audience was intended to experience an earthquake. It feels like the movie was trying to be "Hardcore Henry" esque, but didn't actually do anything special with the camera angles and distracted with the Head's Up Display (HUD).
There's a movie here, you might even like it, but I'm willing to bet that the movie is too unique without much spectacular happening for most people to enjoy it.
(Please keep in mind that the mobile app erased my original review, so I'm a little peeved.)
My biggest concern with this movie is that it concentrates on fear mongering against technology more than creating a good movie. I understand that it's supposed to be a psychological thriller, but that should be what you're concentrating on and not teaching the audience to fear technology: just tell the story.
In fairness, it did do a lot with a clearly low budget: low level actors you won't recognize and (mostly) kids for background characters, Google Glass (or similar) tech, an underground bunker setting, and not particularly great cg effects, but they managed to get by.
The real crux of the story is that isolated in a bunker, they kind of think they're going mad, so "what's real" comes into play, and then it becomes the inevitable question of "is it me or is the technology out to get me", and when that tech is a virtual OS (think Cortana), then there is no telling what is going to happen so there is no expectation, thus nothing to subvert. Its a rule in both Horror and Comedy to play with the audience's tension / expectation (Rules of 3) to establish a pattern, and then break/deliver on it in a surprising manner.
The camera work also messed with me quite a bit. Not only do you have a switch between natural 3rd person camera work and 1st person perspective, the camera work alternatives between almost imperceptively still and wildly jerk about as the audience was intended to experience an earthquake. It feels like the movie was trying to be "Hardcore Henry" esque, but didn't actually do anything special with the camera angles and distracted with the Head's Up Display (HUD).
There's a movie here, you might even like it, but I'm willing to bet that the movie is too unique without much spectacular happening for most people to enjoy it.
Did you know
- TriviaMovie poster similar to Les Misérables (2012), and the girl on both posters is the same: Isabelle Allen.
- ConnectionsReferences Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (1982)
- SoundtracksKids in America
Songwriter Ricki Wilde, Marty Wilde
Recording Artist Kim Wilde (Warner Records)
Publisher Rickim Music/Rak Publishing
- How long is Let's Be Evil?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Budget
- $10,000 (estimated)
- Runtime
- 1h 22m(82 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content