Highlights the impact gang warfare reaps, not only to the guilty of its time but to the innocent generations that follow.Highlights the impact gang warfare reaps, not only to the guilty of its time but to the innocent generations that follow.Highlights the impact gang warfare reaps, not only to the guilty of its time but to the innocent generations that follow.
- Directors
- Writers
- Stars
Photos
- Directors
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Loud mouthed plastic wannabee gangsters poor story line which jumps all over the place. The viewer simply cant follow what is going on or which characters have done what to whom.Poor acting has hindered any real enjoyment even for fans of the Gangster genre.If some time and more thought had of been given to casting to gain just one or two good actors this would of been better.Unfortunately what we have here a multitude of mismatched characters to further confuse the story played by as it seems anyone who turned up on the day. The lines were delivered with no real conviction leaving the film feeling flat with no real impact
This film is a perfect example of what happens when a deluded collective of people get together and think because they have seen a lot of gangster films , that they decide on a whim...... " Oh, I'll knock up a screenplay - get it done and filmed and out there ". Without learning any craft. Writing, film-making or acting - whatsoever.
So in this respect - we have a film based on an idea, not a story.
I understand from reading the boards that this was made without a budget. That is fair enough - but this is not the point . There is absolutely no excuse for this. It's the content which is the issue here.
It lacks story. It lacks structure. It lacks emotion. It's just an awful clichéd montage of clips.
I had to turn it off. I could not connect with a single character, the only thing I was compelled to do was switch it off.
I feel utterly duped and angry that I spent my hard earned money on this. Furious in fact - My teenage son begged me to buy it from the supermarket - duped into buying it as It did have an eye catching cover, and my son is a fan of the genre.
Save your money. Avoid at all costs. Don't be fooled like me.
I also understand that the producers are very precious about their film, ( I have just been skim reading the reviews etc here. ) That is understandable. But as a Filmmaker you have a responsibility surely to produce credible work for your intended audience???
I created an IMDb account and have written this review as I could not get a refund - and wish to save someone else the utter frustration I have had to endure.
This is an embarrassment and and insult to British filmmaking.
So in this respect - we have a film based on an idea, not a story.
I understand from reading the boards that this was made without a budget. That is fair enough - but this is not the point . There is absolutely no excuse for this. It's the content which is the issue here.
It lacks story. It lacks structure. It lacks emotion. It's just an awful clichéd montage of clips.
I had to turn it off. I could not connect with a single character, the only thing I was compelled to do was switch it off.
I feel utterly duped and angry that I spent my hard earned money on this. Furious in fact - My teenage son begged me to buy it from the supermarket - duped into buying it as It did have an eye catching cover, and my son is a fan of the genre.
Save your money. Avoid at all costs. Don't be fooled like me.
I also understand that the producers are very precious about their film, ( I have just been skim reading the reviews etc here. ) That is understandable. But as a Filmmaker you have a responsibility surely to produce credible work for your intended audience???
I created an IMDb account and have written this review as I could not get a refund - and wish to save someone else the utter frustration I have had to endure.
This is an embarrassment and and insult to British filmmaking.
What is this BS? The King brothers made this shite as a personal project and it is a bad one. This film has been shot on a camcorder by the looks of it, the lighting is bad, dialog even worse and there are no actors in this film just people who wish they were. The main baddie I think is actually one of the pathetic "king" brothers that made this POS. This "film" should be shown in films school as an example of what NOT to do when making a film. Also the 2 people that have given this POS reviews full of praised seem to be shills or family friends, no sane person would give this more then one star. If you don't want to waste your time its best to avoid this car crash of a gangster movie.
Inspired to write my first post not to be spiteful as has been suggested but to express MY opinion. Maybe making a movie with no budget and inexperienced actors could be somebody's dream but that doesn't mean that a) it's any good and b) it is necessary that it should be viewed. I watch movies to have have my suspension of disbelief reengaged and to be entertained. All this did was chew up some of my existence in the space time continuum. This was the worst movie I have seen for a long while. As a fan of the "Lock Stock' movie I thought this would be worth a view too. It wasn't. As pointed out it was made with no budget and how it shows. Thin plot ( generous ) and pretty average acting. Facial expressions limited to the range shown by Summer Glau in the Sarah Connor Chronicles, which I liked btw, ( i.e. robot like ). Spoilt my evening. Do not bother.
Did you know
- TriviaThe lift company poster seen in the gangsters office at the start of the film is an actual company based in Romford.
Details
- Runtime
- 1h 45m(105 min)
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content