The Great Fire

About the 1666 Great Fire of London to the soap opera Eastenders That's a bit harsh. Eastenders is about nothing...blah about people who live in certain parts.

This had a point. The devastating fire.

However the spoilt it, at least in my opinion by all this plotting and stuff with the KIng and Catholics.

Sure these things happened around the same time period, but thats a different tale.

The miniseries is about the fire but the fire hardly comes into it. Instead we gets lots of sex, politics and conspiracy.

In a bid for quality, a lot of familiar actors from the best TV series around today are brought in. We get Ben Crompton, Rose Leslie and Charles Dance from GOT but so? I see actors in the UK pop up in all sorts of stuff, good things, bad things.

This doesn't make the film, or series.

I lost interest part way through. If they had stuck to the fire, the effects on normal people, the after effects also, it would have been much more interesting.

And sex doesn't make me watch something, unless it is the story or helps the story, then leave it out.

No-one was worrying about who screwed who while their businesses and homes went up in flames.

Everyone knows the Popish Plot was a fabricated story. Cannot believe they'd make a movie about a real event, the fire, and use an obvious fake story to try to "enhance" it. Ugh.

This is drama by numbers.

A great idea for a script but unfortunately the writing, the directing and most of the acting fails to deliver. There is one character in particular (Hannah)that had I been there I would have thrown her ON To the fire. Constantly whining and nagging and the poor actress was so miscast as a 13 year-old - maybe her agent misheard and thought it was for a 30 year old!

The cast contains some quality actors particularly Daniel Mays and Charles Dance but they are directed so badly that at one point I really thought Dance was going to twirl his moustache and utter "Mou-ha-hah".

Mays also fails to deliver anything much more than a caricature of Pepys and in the first episode the whinging boatman (read cab driver for modern day equivalent) is so clichéd that I thought he was going to say "You know 'oo I 'ad in the back of my boat the other day?"

Indeed the only actor who showed any depth was Rose Leslie as the sister-in-law but think in future years she may be embarrassed to have this one on her CV.

ITV dramas have shown a massive improvement in quality in recent years but sadly this does not fall into that category and is more typical of their output that graced our screens in the late 1990s and early noughties. It is more suited to soap opera than serious drama and is an opportunity missed.

Entertaining not boring. Drama not documentary.

Tiled roofs and too wide streets. Actors emerged with lovely clean bright clothes and faces. Tiled roofs ? At least it was a bit more down and dirty by the finale.

Charles Dance did his normal towering authoritarian part very well, Andrew Buchan a solid professional but dangerous baker.

Completely ridiculous... the common man would never had access to Charlie the second ? And Sammy Pepys was a bit off the other wall .... It is true he buried his wine but not sure that Theresa Mays the stern approach for the part. It looked like he was Made in Dagenham.

However it's ok to watch on a rainy night when you aren't burning the house down.

For anyone expecting a documentary, it's worth noting that this is a dramatisation, there is historical content of course, but there is also a theatrical content running alongside. It's a truly interesting drama, you get some fascinating content, how it started, and how it was stopped.

The accompanying story is interesting, and ends up overshadowing the interest of the fire itself.

It does feel like a drama of two halves, if I'm honest, I didn't care a huge deal for the first two episodes, maybe my expectations were for something quite different, however, the third and fourth parts are terrific, there's a massive switch up in quality.

The special effects are a mix of wonderful and awful, sometimes it looks a bit amateur, and other times it looks amazing. A mixed bag.

The acting is very, very good, the standout without any shadow of doubt is Charles Dance, he's brilliant in it, sinister and commanding. One of two perhaps felt miscast.

Watch it for a bit of escapism. 7/10