Aliens on the Moon: The Truth Exposed

I've seen a lot of garbage over the years, but this by far tops pretty much all the piles of caca on my list. The cast of characters reads like the cast of a Ringling Brothers cleaning crew, the script appears to have been written by a drunk 12-year- old, and the level of intelligence required to view this is just below that of a Walmart baby rattle. The horrid cast of so-called "experts" in this film reads like the patient list at Nurse Ratchett's daily medication rounds. In one scene, they bring up an expert on photography analysis that is billed as a... get this... paranormal expert. Poor Roger Leopardi must have been broke, hungry and way behind on his rent to agree to narrate this spectacularly prepubescent film. Don't waste your time. You'll get more out of watching the grass grow.

This is possibly the fifth worst thing I've ever watched. Certainly the third worst thing I've ever seen on Netflix (behind the atrocious "Haunting of Silver Falls" and another alien conspiracy movie I watched that was even worse).

The entirety of this movie consists of someone talking about an object on the moon that is most certainly just a normal rock or crater, but has a shadow that makes it look strange. Then they color in the "shape" of the object they think is there, which gives - at least they think it gives - the appearance that some kind of artifact has to be there. Then they discuss those shapes for a long time. That's really all there is to it.

Let me point out three reasons why none of their claims make any sense:

1) They claim that the aliens use plasma from stars like our sun to power all their stuff, yet they say that they created a nuclear power plant on the moon. Why would they need it if they already had their energy source found out?

2) Our moon sucks. There's nothing on it.There are other moons in our solar system they could use as a base that have water on them - frozen seas and all - that could be much more useful. And if they had faster than light travel to reach us in the first place, then it would be extremely easy to reach us from there, so it doesn't matter if they're on our moon or another moon further away. No alien race would want to use our moon as a base.

3) Better yet, if aliens came here why wouldn't they just use our earth as a base and just force us to let them stay? It's not like we could do anything about it if they're that advanced. You're saying that these creatures traveled many light years to reach us *just* to create a nuclear power plant on our moon and some satellite that looks down at us (yes, they said the aliens have a satellite dish on the moon. Not like they'd have something a lot better on their own ship). That seems like a gigantic waste of time for them.

To conclude, this documentary makes no sense, and is so bad it's kind of funny. It's one of the worst things I've seen, but I'd still recommend it if you want something to make fun of. For review purposes, 1/10. For pure entertainment purposes, 7/10.

I generally don't watch documentaries of this ilk because i find the conclusions laughably weak and something an 11 year old would come up with. This line sums up everything thats wrong with this:'we ask some of the brightest minds we could find to some up the evidence and whilst they cant be sure of what it is, its very compelling'. So, you cant work out whats happening in your fuzzy pictures. That must mean Aliens have travelled light years to build mines, nuclear reactors, chimneys and buildings on the moon. Nasa is aware of these spacecraft/buildings and airbrush them out of NASA pictures except the ones the show uses. I got at least half way the arguments were so bloody ridiculous i was dumb founded and had to watch out of morbid curiosity. This must be a mockumentory. Nobody is this daft, surely? How Buzz Adlrin managed to keep his cool during interview is the real conspiracy here. Fairplay.

This is 1 hour and 20 minutes of blurred images, speculation, and "helpfully" coloured shadows. Interesting enough the commentator at the beginning of the "documentary" uses the words "are?", "maybe", "could this" but at towards the ends of it skips all these small highly significant words from the narrative. It follows the same format as many other conspiracy "documentaries".

A/ Can it be X?

B/ Can it be Y?

C/ Can it be Z?

----------------- This proves that aliens built stuff on the moon/did something else unbelievable.

If you are into this kind of reasoning and conspiracy then go ahead watch this waste of time. Personally I'd extremely surprised if there are not others out there - and equally surprised if they were particularly interested in this backward backwater planets population.

Another hoax "documentary" in a long list by fraudster Robert Kiviat. He brought us "Alien Autopsy" in 1995, his initial hoax disguised as a documentary.

A long list of shady paranormal "researchers" contributed to this schlock documentary: ghost hunters, Bigfoot trackers, UFO chasers, and MUFON, the biggest of the fraudsters.

By enlarging NASA photographs so that the pixels are gigantic, they imagine all sorts of structures on the moon, including a nuclear reactor, wagon wheels, a cannon 1 mile long, a mine, a prison, and fort. Blurry craters become mile-wide satellite dishes.

Thank goodness that guy with the crazy hair from Ancient Aliens wasn't featured. Although, he would not be out of place in this show.

Save your time and skip the dreck. If I could have rated this a zero, I would. A "1" seems too high.