Animated Atrocities

I'm gonna preface this by saying why there even is a page for Mr. Enter's "Animated Atrocities" to begin with here on IMDB. We all knew it was gonna be a trainwreck of negative reviews from his haters. He's become the internet's punching bag cause he criticizes kids cartoons, therefore he's seen as a big "man-baby".

But he's actually a really good reviewer. Do I agree with him ALL the time? Good God no, but he definitely makes some really good points. Like his reviewing style or not, you have to actually give him a chance. He's definitely harsh, and can get a bit angry, but he's greatly improved over the last few years. So I strongly recommend his more recent videos over his old ones.

Check out his videos and actually give them a chance instead of letting the bulk of the internet judge for you. The lot of you may still not like him, but you'll also learn a lot from his videos.

Call me an "Enterbot" all you want, but I just had to leave this here. He certainly ain't a bad person, and not as bad a reviewer as most have claimed. He's an internet critic, it's his job to criticize these shows. Give him a chance.

I enjoy watching internet reviewers. Two of my favorites are Linkara and the amazingly obscure Comic Strip Critic, and I also enjoy watching MLP reviewers occasionally. I also like Nostalgia Critic, though I guess all the swearing makes me a little uncomfortable, heh.

I was rather intrigued by Mr. Enter due to the subject matter - reviewing really bad episodes of cartoons? Sounds great! But overall, Mr. Enter is just not all that enjoyable as a reviewer. I've watched several episodes because of how interested I am in the subject matter, but I have to admit that I get very little out of what Mr. Enter brings to the table.

Many internet video reviewers focusing on being entertaining, with jokes, fake exaggerated anger, etc. In addition, they may also bring some pretty interesting analysis to the table. Unfortunately, Mr. Enter's analysis is rarely all that outstanding, and he's not all that witty, either. I mean, he's not totally bankrupt, but he just doesn't compare with, well, a GOOD internet video reviewer.

Worst of all, though, he's really, really angry all the time. And it's not acting angry and playing it up for laughs like most "angry critics" online. He's just genuinely angry, and gets wayyy too worked up about everything without having any sense of humor about it. It's just really hard to take, and it's not funny, endearing, or entertaining in the slightest. I mean, just think about how much fun it is to hang around with someone who's constantly getting really enraged and worked up about every little thing. It's just not that fun.

Don't get me wrong, he's not nearly as bad as some people have made him out to be, but overall he's just not that enjoyable.

I don't mind Mr. Enter's content too much. I feel like he gets too much hate, simply because he whines so much in a lot of his reviews. His reviews can be good, but then his reviews can just be him repeating himself over and over again.

Mr. Enter can bring up some interesting points on a subject. His Admirable Animation on Duck Dodgers' Samurai Quack was pretty good. He goes into detail on how to make a respectful parody, while still maintaining some kind of funny aspect. Another great Admirable Animation of his is his Gravity Falls review on 'Land before swine'. In that review he describes how to deal with two characters that have the same goals, but different dynamics at the same time.

Sometimes his animated atrocities are just him rambling & repeating about 'how he doesn't like gross out cartoons' & etc. And he gets a little too p1ssed off from a piece of fiction. To the point where he makes no valid opinions while rambling.

The guy clearly doesn't need the hate that he gets. There are worse cartoon community channels out there. Such as 'Valiksisbum', Phantom Strider after he jumped the shark, Channel Frederator after they jumped the shark, small channels that talk nonstop about TTG, etc. But then again there are better Cartoon Youtubers that get their point across in a superior way within the community. Such as PieGuyRulez, Rebeltaxi, Lewtoons and etc.

I found his reviews flawed, rushed or sometimes insulting! The thing is that he let's his emotions and massive ego get the best of him. This is true in his "Pet Sitter " when he called out and offended one of the writers for not satisfying his ridiculously high standers. Not to mention the production quality is pretty low in his episodes. Also, he quite an egotistical person. His reviewers sometimes feel rush out and unthought out which is quite unprofessional I might add. For example on his " Brothers Grunt" he kept repeating the same two to three points over and over again throughout the entire video. Finally he takes things too seriously. For example, most of his MLP FiM reviews can have him swearing like a sailor and insulting the writers or just him screaming on top of this lungs.

Quite frankly I'm surprised IMDb lists a YouTube series on here anyways, which is an odd thing to do but I'll accept it. But many of the reviews in this section have been nothing but rude insults thrown at a person. Mr Enter (as his YouTube channel is called) isn't a despicable person, nor is he deserving of half the crap thrown at him here by his haters. Does he get angry? Yes. Is it entirely justified? Mostly, yes. Everyone likes to pick apart his intentions like this person is some object they get to pull apart and decide if it's to their liking, and I find that nothing short of reprehensible and for every piece of actual criticism I've read about him, I've read ten pieces of judgmental and angry junk that is nothing more than the very thing these people seem to have against Mr Enter; rude, arrogant, and insulting. Only instead of a piece of art he found particularly repulsive (and make no mistake, he has reviewed some truly nauseating distasteful trash, and he does make sure to cite his problems with each clearly, using research to back up some of his more political points), these reviewers only seem to want to use these words to attack a person. And for every decent criticism, it's exaggerated by hyperbole like saying his voice is worse than nails on a chalk board (it's not that bad) and he takes cartoons too seriously for a 30 year old man (he sees animation as an art form and thinks it should be treated as such) or other such nonsense.

Next time you attempt to demean and berate a person, I suggest to try to see things from their point of view. Perhaps you might learn to see things differently or at the very least provide something useful, rather than become part of the problem by ranting and insulting someone's viewpoints and manner of expressing it.