No Man's Sky

Some people may not want to forget the past of No Man's Sky and its rough launch, but I think that they should. Three years later after release, a ton of updates have come out, improving and adding new features. For example, the recent beyond update adds increased multiplayer lobbies, Virtual Reality Support, ridable and farmable creatures, a new base power system, cooking and a whole new NPC system. I think that you. reading this right now should go and buy this wonderful game!

Ok so i played this on release and think i played arround 39/40 houers and found the game pretty bad and so i stopped.

And now 6/7years later i started again because they have been updating the game so often and adding new things that it made me curious if it got any better. And yes it is.

This game is insane now. When i play time just flies and i cant stop playing wich is annoying and amazing. Because i wana sleep but i just wanna quest and explore abit more.. abit = fast two houers gone. And that makes a game good for me. When it makes you forget about time.

This game is a easy 9/10 now.

Wow. What a game! A whole universe unlimited boundaries at your fingertips. There is no limit for what you can't do... Or so is there?

No Man's Sky has been hyped for three years, making it nearly impossible to meet the fans increasing expectations. Although it delivered almost everything it promised, No Man's Sky failed to go the extra step beyond what was featured in the trailers.

Even with expectations not fully met, No Man's Sky is still a remarkable and unique game. That feeling of awe when you first load the game and gaze out upon the world that no player has been on before you is a feeling no other game can deliver. Every planet has a unique combination of flora and fauna that leaves players wondering what could be around every corner.

Even with a universe of seemingly infinite exploration, some main components No Man's Sky get repetitive very quickly. Having to fuel numerous portions of your star ship constantly quickly becomes a chore. Most of the animals begin to look the same; when you see one weird orange antelope, you have seen them all. Is it a good game? Most definitely. Even with the repetitive features, No Man's Sky has changed gaming with its innovative world generation, similar to that of sandbox games such as Minecraft. Future updating is going to be necessary to keep fans attention. Should you rush out and spend $60 on No Man's Sky? Probably not. Unless you have been dying to acquire the game for years and can't wait any longer, this is one to best wait for the sales rack. Thanks for reading. Dance on!

So after years and years of updates and tweaks, the devs at Hello Games still have yet to produce a stable product. Quite simply, this game is too much for anything but the most robust pc systems and possibly the new gen consoles. 100% guaranteed to freeze and crash if you play for longer than an hour. It does not auto save except in certain instances, so if you have not been entering and existing your space craft, or carrying a portable save point with you and using it every ten minutes, you will get screwed out of your hard work every time. You have been warned.

...is a seductive one: Simulate a living universe and forever explore its wonders. Sadly, like so many other attempts, this game falls back to just-get-it-done semi-procedural planets filled with handmade assets, handmade if-then-else logic, handmade systems, and a vapid handmade story. Npcs have minimal economy & ecology, no interplay of instincts/bodily-functions vs circumstance, no autonomy besides aimless wandering or fighting. There is no simulation in progress here. The effect is to make the player feel alone in an endlessly propagating universe of hollow pre-scripted geometry.

Gameplay consists of: Base-building, Treasure-hunt, Accumulation/hoarding, Ground combat, Space combat, Dress-ups, Bonus-stacking, and Errands.

The game does a lot of things but at a super basic level, especially combat, which is plagued by 'faster-horse' lack of imagination, its like a childish imagining of simplified WWII-era pew-pew, but with glowy-bits! Exploration is also frustratingly primitive, like worse than 'look out the window', because glass blocks your scanner, and you have no computer to map/track it all anyway. Technology is just a hand-wavy vibe here; set-dressing.

This game is still strangely addictive, but in an unhealthy, unthinking way. I felt like a zoned-out slot-machine player, forever trying one more turn of the RNG, to get more... stuff.

Props to the developers for the scope here, but its ultimately a casual-game, with the simple highly abstracted grind that entails. There's no reward for being clever, as the game simply doesn't permit it.

Artwork is of a stodge generic sci-fi style you've seen many times before. Fx basic. Assets repetitive dumps of handmade data, as opposed to a few kb of instructions to generate it on the fly (an old, old argument that was lost here). Design also needlessly sticks to dumb 20th-century budget sci-fi tv conventions like: 1G in space, most sapient aliens being humans in tacky costumes, manually operated handheld props, sets with purely decorative screens/consoles etc.. Sound felt a little amateurish in places to further hurt immersion. Music was distracting enough to switch it off.

Ran on Linux via Steam Proton.