A giant bloodthirsty Easter bunny starts viciously killing the local townsfolk. When the Mayor refuses to act and the attacks grow more gruesome, the town finds its very survival in the hand... Read allA giant bloodthirsty Easter bunny starts viciously killing the local townsfolk. When the Mayor refuses to act and the attacks grow more gruesome, the town finds its very survival in the hands of a wannabe actress and a crazy dog-catcher.A giant bloodthirsty Easter bunny starts viciously killing the local townsfolk. When the Mayor refuses to act and the attacks grow more gruesome, the town finds its very survival in the hands of a wannabe actress and a crazy dog-catcher.
- Directors
- Writers
- Stars
Autumn Bodell
- The Bride
- (as Alison Bodell)
- Directors
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
I usually pick movies to watch based solely on the title and dvd cover. I really need to start doing more research. I thought this would be a mildly entertaining, almost scary death fest. It was more like a Troma movie with slightly better production. I would have never even been able to guess that it was a rabbit. That being said, the last 10 minutes was really good. I actually laughed a couple times. There are worse killer Easter bunny movies.
The Beaster Bunny, or as it's called here "Beaster Day: Here Comes Peter Cottonhell" not sure who Peter Cottonhell is in the film, but I digress. The film is not great.
The plot is a bit rubbish, but I found that it fell together a little bit better than other ultra low budget films, it had conflicts between the two main characters, one arguing with her Father about getting a job, the other, Doug, believing he should have won employee of the year again.
The special effects were poor, but had a sort of low budget charm to them. The music was bad, and the acting wasn't great either, although you could tell there was an element of tongue in cheek. The ending felt a bit rushed too.
3/10: Mildly enjoyable low budget horror, with a somewhat unique villain and lots of kills.
The plot is a bit rubbish, but I found that it fell together a little bit better than other ultra low budget films, it had conflicts between the two main characters, one arguing with her Father about getting a job, the other, Doug, believing he should have won employee of the year again.
The special effects were poor, but had a sort of low budget charm to them. The music was bad, and the acting wasn't great either, although you could tell there was an element of tongue in cheek. The ending felt a bit rushed too.
3/10: Mildly enjoyable low budget horror, with a somewhat unique villain and lots of kills.
The Bad Things:
E V ER Y T H I NG.
Good things: They tried I guess.
Good things: They tried I guess.
Not funny and not good at all...it makes no sense except you will see lots of trashy stripper boobs...
Granted, I was lured in by this 2014 movie's cover. Yeah, I mean, sure I knew it was most likely going to be a dubious movie, but at least that cover looked interesting. So I thought I would give the movie a chance.
Turns out that "Beaster Day: Here Comes Peter Cottonhell" was bad. Really, really bad. Actually, it is one of those movies that are so bad that they are actually fun to watch.
I can't even begin to fathom what writer and director John Bacchus was thinking when coming up with this movie. Sure, it was a horror comedy, and it actually worked out well enough, but the movie was just not making much of any sense if you look at it objectively.
The storyline is straight forward, but there is no background for the events happening in the movie, and it just seems very random at best.
Visually then "Beaster Day: Here Comes Peter Cottonhell" is bad, horribly, horribly bad. That giant bunny looks so grotesquely wrong that it is so much fun to watch. Everything about it is just off, and it looks nothing like the rather interesting monstrous bunny on the movie's cover.
Make no mistake, "Beaster Day: Here Comes Peter Cottonhell" is a low budget movie through and through, and it shows everywhere throughout the entire movie. And it takes a special taste is tacky movies to enjoy a movie such as "Beaster Day: Here Comes Peter Cottonhell". Oddly enough, I did enjoy it because it was so bad.
The acting in the movie was dubious and questionable, but it felt right for the movie though, given the fact that everything else in the movie was so lousy. However, one thing that director John Bacchus should have left out was the pointless nudity, because it just served no purpose for the movie, and it just added an unnecessary element of sleaze to the movie.
My rating of "Beaster Day: Here Comes Peter Cottonhell" lands on a mere fourout of ten stars. It is, however, a movie that you should watch, if you find yourself given the chance. The movie really is so atrociously bad that it is a blast to sit through it.
Turns out that "Beaster Day: Here Comes Peter Cottonhell" was bad. Really, really bad. Actually, it is one of those movies that are so bad that they are actually fun to watch.
I can't even begin to fathom what writer and director John Bacchus was thinking when coming up with this movie. Sure, it was a horror comedy, and it actually worked out well enough, but the movie was just not making much of any sense if you look at it objectively.
The storyline is straight forward, but there is no background for the events happening in the movie, and it just seems very random at best.
Visually then "Beaster Day: Here Comes Peter Cottonhell" is bad, horribly, horribly bad. That giant bunny looks so grotesquely wrong that it is so much fun to watch. Everything about it is just off, and it looks nothing like the rather interesting monstrous bunny on the movie's cover.
Make no mistake, "Beaster Day: Here Comes Peter Cottonhell" is a low budget movie through and through, and it shows everywhere throughout the entire movie. And it takes a special taste is tacky movies to enjoy a movie such as "Beaster Day: Here Comes Peter Cottonhell". Oddly enough, I did enjoy it because it was so bad.
The acting in the movie was dubious and questionable, but it felt right for the movie though, given the fact that everything else in the movie was so lousy. However, one thing that director John Bacchus should have left out was the pointless nudity, because it just served no purpose for the movie, and it just added an unnecessary element of sleaze to the movie.
My rating of "Beaster Day: Here Comes Peter Cottonhell" lands on a mere fourout of ten stars. It is, however, a movie that you should watch, if you find yourself given the chance. The movie really is so atrociously bad that it is a blast to sit through it.
Did you know
- TriviaThis film is a parody of Here Comes Peter Cottontail (1971) and monster movies.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Nostalgia Critic: Hop (2019)
- SoundtracksSurf Pajama Party
By Pink Delicates
- How long is Beaster Day: Here Comes Peter Cottonhell?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- The Beaster Bunny
- Filming locations
- Allentown, Pennsylvania, USA(on location)
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $150,000 (estimated)
- Runtime
- 1h 27m(87 min)
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content