A classic werewolf flick with an amphibious twist; it's a race against time to find the antidote.A classic werewolf flick with an amphibious twist; it's a race against time to find the antidote.A classic werewolf flick with an amphibious twist; it's a race against time to find the antidote.
- Director
- Writer
- Stars
- Awards
- 1 nomination total
Josh Gould
- The Frogmonster
- (as Josh Adam Gould)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
I had the pleasure of seeing this at the Chattanooga Film Festival today with the director and most of the cast in attendance. The trailer really doesn't do the film justice. The creature effects are great, the sound design is hilarious (you'll know what I mean when you see the movie), and the acting is way above average for a horror movie. I think Mary Malloy is going to be pretty popular here in a year or two. She's the standout in this film. She's like Maika Monroe in It Follows, but with way more personality. If you love horror, comedy, or a combination of the two, go see the movie wherever you can. It's the What We Do in the Shadows of 2016.
Grossly underrated and FILLED with practical special effects. There's no way this should b rated less than 6, nevermind 4.2. Horror-hating wimps obviously bn rating it.
I was so ready to love the bad premice, the bad story, the bad acting, the bad music, the bad everything but it was not funny i was drunk the whole time and still wasnt funny. I like so bad it's good movies but this was not good at all. Like atrocious to watch. Wasted my time 2/10
Yes the acting is bad so who cares I'm looking for cheap entertainment . It's got some so cheap practical effects and cheezy creature which think was great. Remember kids this not a Hollywood movie probably made for a few thousand dollars. So not saying it's great but a a lot fun
I decided to watch this because it had 4 out of 5 stars on Amazon Prime (how????). That was a huge mistake, because, 1. The plot is strange. It jumps from past to present, which would be fine, if they did it cohesively. I was generally confused because they were jumping around a lot and I did not understand what was actually going on. I looked away for a few seconds here and there, but that shouldn't be enough to throw me off of the entire movie plot line. 2. It had a lot of weird character side plots that I found to be unnecessary. 3. Most of the acting is terrible.
There is ONE saving grace, and that is the special effects. The "creature" in the film actually looks pretty great, and the gore is realistic. I would definitely recommend watching the parts with the creature, because I love the effects. But as for the rest of the movie, do yourself a favor and fast-forward through it because this movie has nothing else to offer.
There is ONE saving grace, and that is the special effects. The "creature" in the film actually looks pretty great, and the gore is realistic. I would definitely recommend watching the parts with the creature, because I love the effects. But as for the rest of the movie, do yourself a favor and fast-forward through it because this movie has nothing else to offer.
Did you know
- TriviaOne of a number of productions made during the mid-2010s with a "Bad Blood" phrase in its title. These include Bad Blood (2015), Bad Blood (2017), the television series Bad Blood (2015), Wicked Blood (2014) (aka "Bad Blood"), The Stranger (2014) (working title: "Bad Blood"), Batman: Bad Blood (2016), and Bad Blood: The Movie (2016).
- How long is Bad Blood: The Movie?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Bad Blood
- Filming locations
- Dunwoody, Georgia, USA(Worthington House)
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1h 20m(80 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.00 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content