Four battle-weary Crusaders take on a mission to track down the evil predator who has abducted all the men and children from a devastated village.Four battle-weary Crusaders take on a mission to track down the evil predator who has abducted all the men and children from a devastated village.Four battle-weary Crusaders take on a mission to track down the evil predator who has abducted all the men and children from a devastated village.
Fergal Coghlan
- Hamish
- (as Fergal Philips)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Terrible script, laughable acting talent and childish make up. This film is so bad that it is like a poor school play. I stuck with it over three days as I kept falling asleep watching it. I persevered simply because I could not believe how bad it was and wanted to see whether there was anything good. In the end I discovered something - the reason Odo in Game of Thrones has no lines is because he's a useless actor. Positively the worst film I have ever seen and if I could give it a minus score I would. The location was not bad I suppose - but then that's nature. The monsters were worse than a 1960s Doctor Who special effect trial. The few special effects they tried were silly. All I can say is bad bad bad bad bad.
Bored and looking for something to kill time with iTunes, This on prime. First off the editing is horrible. Whoever edit this film should not be allowed anywhere near another film. Props were OK but the character portrayal is like somewhere in English village. These so-called Crusaders of which there are only three not four have to be in Syria or Turkey, but nothing resembles that I would say, unless you are desperate for a poor hack and slice to fill time don't waste your time The only positive is the cast all healthy good people with good teeth and nicely done make up on the ladies All in all don't bother.
Oh dear, they did try, bless them. This film is so bad its actually funny. If it had been marketed as a satire of the warrior/action film genre and had thrown in a few Monty Pyton style gags, it might have even been a minor hit.
By and large for me at least, the only way to watch this film from end to end is to treat it as a comedy of errors. Bad sets, bad costumes, hilarious fight scenes and generally chuckle worthy acting. Its the kind of production you might expect the Lower Putney Medieval Enactment Society to put on after a minor win at Lotto.
My advice, watch this one when you have had a few beers and you are in the mood for a laugh. You wont be disappointed. One out of ten from me.
By and large for me at least, the only way to watch this film from end to end is to treat it as a comedy of errors. Bad sets, bad costumes, hilarious fight scenes and generally chuckle worthy acting. Its the kind of production you might expect the Lower Putney Medieval Enactment Society to put on after a minor win at Lotto.
My advice, watch this one when you have had a few beers and you are in the mood for a laugh. You wont be disappointed. One out of ten from me.
I can barely believe I watched this to the end - this is, without much doubt, the worst film I think I've ever seen, and I've seen the Dungeons and Dragons films. The clunky, heavy handed plotting, the glaring genre signposting, the rabid cliches, generally awful acting, the painfully ridiculous wobbly fight scenes, the equally wobbly demon fingers, the drudgery of the action, and the condensed and, frankly, token ending climactic (maybe climatic would be a more appropriate term, used in relation to the weather in this film's case - it did have some nice weather shots, which felt more urgent than the plot ...) scene punch this film into the minus score zone.
In fairness, there were some nice scenery shots, and there is, perhaps, something to be said for the villiage architecture aiming at something more generally 'historic' (at least they tried). Keeping one eye on a pretty hunky Hadrian Howard did keep me awake at least, even if he had some dreadful lines (admittedly getting some stiff competition from pretty much every other character in that department - and the accents were awful). As others have rightly said, if this was billed as a comedy it might have worked, with a bit of additional effort - it did have its 'you've got to be kidding me' moments - but the wink to the camera just doesn't come.
That is and hour and a half of my life I clearly won't be getting back.
The dialogue is a bit weak here and there, but not absolutely terrible, considering. The story itself is not particularly engaging. The acting itself was OK, all things considered, and above par for a low budget movie. The fight scenes, however, were ridiculous -- swing a sword like you mean it, man! The final fight was just as ridiculous.
I will say that I thought it was mostly well shot and edited, though, everything considered.
I found most of the characters personable which offers a certain amount of redemption to the film, and of them I liked the Mule although I spent the first 30 minutes wondering why they had him carrying around a bundle of wood when there is wood all over the flippin' place...
I will say that I thought it was mostly well shot and edited, though, everything considered.
I found most of the characters personable which offers a certain amount of redemption to the film, and of them I liked the Mule although I spent the first 30 minutes wondering why they had him carrying around a bundle of wood when there is wood all over the flippin' place...
Did you know
- TriviaThe film was shot within 16 days.
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- The Four Warriors
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1h 35m(95 min)
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content