IMDb RATING
5.6/10
1.2K
YOUR RATING
When a law school student hails an app-based car service and is assaulted by her driver, she becomes a NetCar driver herself and goes on a vigilante crusade to find and catch her assailant.When a law school student hails an app-based car service and is assaulted by her driver, she becomes a NetCar driver herself and goes on a vigilante crusade to find and catch her assailant.When a law school student hails an app-based car service and is assaulted by her driver, she becomes a NetCar driver herself and goes on a vigilante crusade to find and catch her assailant.
Remington Keyes
- Bouncer
- (uncredited)
- …
Adrian M. Mompoint
- Security Guard
- (uncredited)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Probably a four star movie, but I gave it five because it exceeds the expectations I would have for a Lifetime movie.
The acting was decent all around. No Oscar performances but better quality than most other made-for-tv movies.
The general premise isn't so bad, especially considering it came out in 2016. Unfortunately the movie makes up a lot of nonsense, such as Net Drivers not being informed of a customer's destination until they are in the car (the movie pretty much falls apart if this nonsense didn't exist).
More nonsense involves the ridiculous rules regarding warrants that this movie made up.
I do give this movie credit for it's ending.
I wish the baby mask had been explained.
The acting was decent all around. No Oscar performances but better quality than most other made-for-tv movies.
The general premise isn't so bad, especially considering it came out in 2016. Unfortunately the movie makes up a lot of nonsense, such as Net Drivers not being informed of a customer's destination until they are in the car (the movie pretty much falls apart if this nonsense didn't exist).
More nonsense involves the ridiculous rules regarding warrants that this movie made up.
I do give this movie credit for it's ending.
I wish the baby mask had been explained.
Another TV movie whose title has been changed to the Wrong Car. I guess Originally the movie was called Vehicle For Revenge. Anyways it's about a woman who gets in a car she thinks is some Ride Co. To take her home and gets rufied and ends up sexually assaulted. The movie is subpar at best, but it really takes a turn to the stupid once the suspect in the case goes back and picks up women at the same spot, in the same car, and takes them to the same hotel, after already knowing he is a suspect and the police could be watching him. Really really dumb. 3/10.
This film has a straight story line and pursues it quickly to a neatly tied ending. It seems to have 2 agendas: To point out the lack of safety surrounding the Uber fad for both passengers & drivers; and to serve as a poetic justice platform surrounding the vulnerability of the female population. Trudi is the strong, determined victim, and if the film decides to change its name for a 3rd time, may I recommend "Wrong Chick".
I found it entertaining and provocative and the acting was actually not bad. My biggest concern are those who think this film's only purpose (or LifeTime's) it to make men look bad. If you feel like this film is pointing a finger at you, you might need to do some soul searching.
For me, the ending was a bit rushed and let a lot for the viewer to reach conclusions about. I don't like when a film does a lot of hand-holding, but I do like a bit more clarity. As someone in the legal field, I know they'll need to have the Detective's confidence to push this through court with that narrative. But that, too, would be poetic justice.
I don't think everyone will appreciate this film the way someone who's actually been in similar situations might. It's definitely not a date film.
I found it entertaining and provocative and the acting was actually not bad. My biggest concern are those who think this film's only purpose (or LifeTime's) it to make men look bad. If you feel like this film is pointing a finger at you, you might need to do some soul searching.
For me, the ending was a bit rushed and let a lot for the viewer to reach conclusions about. I don't like when a film does a lot of hand-holding, but I do like a bit more clarity. As someone in the legal field, I know they'll need to have the Detective's confidence to push this through court with that narrative. But that, too, would be poetic justice.
I don't think everyone will appreciate this film the way someone who's actually been in similar situations might. It's definitely not a date film.
...but the writers left out the good parts!
I loved the little gang of bangers. They were pretty convincing as not so bad guys. The real bad guys very slimy enough to give themselves away. The baby? I don't understand his role here but, whatever.
This movie had so much going for it and just as it got good......yeah, that's how I felt.
I loved the little gang of bangers. They were pretty convincing as not so bad guys. The real bad guys very slimy enough to give themselves away. The baby? I don't understand his role here but, whatever.
This movie had so much going for it and just as it got good......yeah, that's how I felt.
With Uber and Lyft in the news all the time lately, I think the subject might be of interest to a lot of viewers. The plot is very plausible, people are finding that out, with all the incidents that have already happened. Way too much trust out there. Of course criminals are using technology now, apps, new kinds of vulnerability. As for the film I thought the casting was good. There might be some plot flaws, but remember she is driven by anger, and might be a bit reckless and not thinking straight. That said, it all works out. But yes there could have been more depth. A little freaky at the end, should make a lot of women more careful.
Did you know
- GoofsThe suspect at the motel room says police need a warrant to search it. That's partially incorrect as police pursuant to California Penal Code Section 836 may initiate a search or seizure without a warrant if there is a probable cause to believe that a felony has been committed. Additionally, the suspect did verbally consent after he mentioned the warrant, making his objection moot.
- SoundtracksFinders
Written by Kaz Gamble and Daniel W Burke
Performed by Gamble & Burke
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- El auto equivocado
- Filming locations
- Worcester, Massachusetts, USA(street scenes)
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content