A Christmas Carol

At the very beginning, this film it is identified as an amateur production. It says "A Movie by...." Professional directors agreed to discontinue that phrase decades ago, because it is presumptuous to claim that the director did it all by his/her own. Nowadays, it is considered proper for a director (like Ron Howard) to say "A Ron Howard Film." not "A Film By Ron Howard"

Anyone purporting to be qualified to review a film on anything other than whether they liked it or not, should take things like the budget, resources et cetera into consideration. The director of this film shows considerable creativity in his use of these resources. That is assuming the amount of the budget quoted went mostly to the narrator.

Other reviewers criticized the sets. The director showed significant creativity in the use of sets, considering the low budget and his singing voice was one of the best in the film. It would be interesting to see what he could do with better funding. Then, he could afford to have better miking, lighting et cetera and could afford to rent a sound stage so the ambient light and sound could be controlled.

In these times, there are people making movies in their living room with their cell phones and are putting them onto YouTube. At least this guy got his product distributed. I admire his effort.

Where does one start. Let's start with Scrooge. i don't know Colin Baker. I guess he was part of the Dr. Who canon. He is just terrible in this. First of all, he doesn't remotely look the part. Bob Cratchet is a well fed, prosperous looking fellow. He actually gives money to a charity. The guy is supposed to be destitute, barely fending for his family. He only has one child, Tiny Tim, who isn't really all that tiny. Where are the other kids? They must have not had any spare cash to hire a couple of them. The ghosts are lame. There are no sets to indicate a place where Scrooge was brought up or worked or anything else. He is hired by Jacob Marley who would be about thirty years older than him. Scrooge has no bite to him and doesn't seem to be the least bit frightening. The ending scenes are so dull. And there is a sappy reunion with his lost love. Finally, there are a series of awful songs that never seem to end. I'm very patient with this story, but this should never be watched.

I am always intrigued by films like this.

When I went to it, a site called: "All about Funances and Duct Systems" came up (?). Is Anthony D. P. Mann a Furnace Specialist by DAY and an Actor/Songwriter/Screenplay Author by Night?

The opening credits states: "featuring the talents of (Anthony D. P. Mann et al). Presumptuous, don't you think? Shouldn't you let US watch it and decide if those people have "talent"?

The Opening Credit also states " Devon Murray-Powell, as The Cratchit Family". ALL of them? That must have been exhausting!

Where did the money come from? Who is (WAS?) the expected audience? Who is Colin Baker?

Brent Holland wrote the Band Tracks. They were really good...a lot better than the pitchy singing that they accompanied. Why aren't they mentioned in the closing credits?

Oh, no hard feelings, but the film is a piece of CRAP!! It is badly "mic"ed, making the dialogue impossible to hear. There is no arc. I am not sure WHY Ebenezer Scrooge decided to change his ways from watching this film.

BUT, Just like Ed Wood, Anthony D. P. Mann MADE a movie and got it released somehow. I got my copy from a public library in the suburbs of Chicago so, I suppose it is a "real film".

Maybe Anthony D. P. Mann knows Michael Bloomberg.

I watched this film, so you don't have to! Spare yourself the 67 minutes. Clean out your closet instead.

His review was helpful to me primarily because I didn't have to write it myself. Like him, I love Dickens' story in most every telling and retelling but found this unwatchable in every way including the weird gray cast to the...cast. The song Scrooge sings to Marley's picture was where I gave up. It had an almost romantic vibe that would have been far less creepy had it seemed intentional rather than like a repressed and unrecognized impulse on Scrooge's part. Out of curiosity, I watched Kirk Cameron's "Saving Christmas" the other day. It's currently at a 1.5 rating and the second lowest rated film on all of IMDb. While Saving Christmas is not good by any stretch of the imagination, at least it had a kind of hypnotic weirdness that kept me watching all the way through. Frankly, I'd like to sentence everyone who gave Saving Christmas a 1 or 2 rating to an hour of watching this thing to see what Worst can really be.

I love A Christmas Carol and am generally easy to please when it comes to any version of the story. That said, this is among the worst I've seen. It is consistently bad in all regards.

The performers are mis-cast and bear little resemblance to your expectation. Likewise, the sets don't convey the proper time or place. And the music certainly won't put you in the Christmas spirit either.

I want to like every version of A Christmas Carol I see but that wasn't possible for this presentation (note – I had to fast forward through it while scanning for anything "good" just to see it all the way to the end).