Curvature
- 2017
- 1h 30m
IMDb RATING
4.7/10
3.3K
YOUR RATING
An engineer travels back in time to stop herself from committing a murder.An engineer travels back in time to stop herself from committing a murder.An engineer travels back in time to stop herself from committing a murder.
- Awards
- 3 wins & 3 nominations total
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
4.73.3K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
It just takes one bad actor...
Zach Avery's acting was like a cancer to this movie. Every time he was on screen it died a little more. Good god, how did he make it past the auditions?
Lyndsy Fonseca did a fine job with the sub-par lines and direction, so it may have been an fun, but throw-away average movie if it wasn't for Zach Screen Cancer Avery who did his best version of Lenny von Dohlen's "Miles" from Electric Dreams (circa 1984).
It's so bad, in fact, that it has prompted this, my first IMDB review.
Avoid.
Lyndsy Fonseca did a fine job with the sub-par lines and direction, so it may have been an fun, but throw-away average movie if it wasn't for Zach Screen Cancer Avery who did his best version of Lenny von Dohlen's "Miles" from Electric Dreams (circa 1984).
It's so bad, in fact, that it has prompted this, my first IMDB review.
Avoid.
Certainly not a 1, but far from a 10...
Honestly, I don't understand the 1s (or the 10s), but it certainly wasn't as bad as the average reviews here insinuate. At the same time, it's far from a 10, and definitely a one and done kind of flick.
It's absolutely more thriller than sci-fi and relies heavily on the "mystery" of what's going on, which means nobody can just talk straight about anything. As a result, Fonseca is just frog-hopping from pad to pad, clue by clue, until she gets to one big reveal, which at least solves enough mystery to know who she can/can't trust and where to go next which ultimately leads her to the final reveal, which of course is not entirely what she had predicted. The problem with that method of storytelling is the supporting characters start to get frustrating fast. You'd think at least "government agent guy" would be a little more straightforward and less lackey villain in a suit, but unfortunately he comes across as the latter for a good 90% of the film. Also as others have pointed out in their reviews, the token ally character is both written as rather bland and definitely portrayed that way. However, the overall mystery is decent and does wrap up in the end, although yes, it does leave you with questions assuming you were engaged in the first place. Overall, not bad, just doesn't really add anything new in terms of story mechanics/plot formula for the genre(s). Lyndsy Fonseca was great in the lead though, it's just a shame she has to carry most of the other cast too. And Linda Hamilton's role is tragically short and almost pointless except to put her name in the credits.
It's absolutely more thriller than sci-fi and relies heavily on the "mystery" of what's going on, which means nobody can just talk straight about anything. As a result, Fonseca is just frog-hopping from pad to pad, clue by clue, until she gets to one big reveal, which at least solves enough mystery to know who she can/can't trust and where to go next which ultimately leads her to the final reveal, which of course is not entirely what she had predicted. The problem with that method of storytelling is the supporting characters start to get frustrating fast. You'd think at least "government agent guy" would be a little more straightforward and less lackey villain in a suit, but unfortunately he comes across as the latter for a good 90% of the film. Also as others have pointed out in their reviews, the token ally character is both written as rather bland and definitely portrayed that way. However, the overall mystery is decent and does wrap up in the end, although yes, it does leave you with questions assuming you were engaged in the first place. Overall, not bad, just doesn't really add anything new in terms of story mechanics/plot formula for the genre(s). Lyndsy Fonseca was great in the lead though, it's just a shame she has to carry most of the other cast too. And Linda Hamilton's role is tragically short and almost pointless except to put her name in the credits.
flawed, but on the whole, enjoyable
Seems a bit of snobbery in the reviews here about how much they understand the ins and ours of time travel, therefore it's an Amazing film.
well, you don't, you would understand the paradoxical levels in this film are implausible.
That aside, it IS a movie, it's there to be enjoyed and not scrutinised for everything that is fact, not fiction.
personally I enjoyed the film, though there are loopholes and giant cracks of sci fact, not sci fi, the premise is quite original. I would watch again, it won't win any Oscars or pull up any trees in the advancement of cinema, but it's an enjoyable and thought provoking piece
Compentent independant sci-fi
Pluses- the mystery and suspense, the sound effects and sound tracking, the camera work, some good thoughtful dialogue and the leads acting which holds together the movie
Minuses- some wooden support acting, and the plot doesn't entirely make sense how it ends.
Overall, work a watch if you don't mind more amateur indie sci-fi and don't expect too much, but if you expect something Hollywood polished, action driven, special fx driven or mindbendingly crafted, give it a miss.
Interesting mystery, TV-movie quality
It's an exciting mystery where there's always something we don't know. At the end, I'm not even sure we got all the answers.
There is one scene that is too long and too depressing, complete with terrible new age music. I was worried the whole movie would be like this because I didn't bother to read the summary.
But then things change drastically, and for the better. First there is more new age music with what I would describe as footage from those science movies we watched in school.
Helen is on the run, and the movie just got more fun. The new age music has changed to what was probably called "space music" in the 60s.
During an exciting car chase, someone got really creative with camera work when a vehicle rolled over. But it's like that Schwarznegger movie where he somehow ended up in the real world and discovered pain for the first time. The characters don't seem to feel pain or get hurt.
Speaking of Schwarznegger, one of his best-known co-stars, Linda Hamilton, plays a college professor. Yes, Helen's a science and math nerd. Too pretty to be one, but when she and Alex start doing complicated math puzzles she gets so excited. Lyndsy Fonseca gives a good performance, going from depressed to frightened to excited. And she shows a lot of determination.
There are serious moral questions. Someone wants revenge and we have an explosion, but I'm not sure why.
There are flashbacks and scenes involving science experiments that I didn't quite understand.
Other than her, I don't know that there's anything special with the acting.
Is it family friendly? As usual for movies like this, the sound goes out and a character's mouth is blurry in many cases. Other than that, I don't know that there's anything to be too concerned about.
I would compare this to a TV-movie or an episode of a TV series, but it's entertaining enough.
There is one scene that is too long and too depressing, complete with terrible new age music. I was worried the whole movie would be like this because I didn't bother to read the summary.
But then things change drastically, and for the better. First there is more new age music with what I would describe as footage from those science movies we watched in school.
Helen is on the run, and the movie just got more fun. The new age music has changed to what was probably called "space music" in the 60s.
During an exciting car chase, someone got really creative with camera work when a vehicle rolled over. But it's like that Schwarznegger movie where he somehow ended up in the real world and discovered pain for the first time. The characters don't seem to feel pain or get hurt.
Speaking of Schwarznegger, one of his best-known co-stars, Linda Hamilton, plays a college professor. Yes, Helen's a science and math nerd. Too pretty to be one, but when she and Alex start doing complicated math puzzles she gets so excited. Lyndsy Fonseca gives a good performance, going from depressed to frightened to excited. And she shows a lot of determination.
There are serious moral questions. Someone wants revenge and we have an explosion, but I'm not sure why.
There are flashbacks and scenes involving science experiments that I didn't quite understand.
Other than her, I don't know that there's anything special with the acting.
Is it family friendly? As usual for movies like this, the sound goes out and a character's mouth is blurry in many cases. Other than that, I don't know that there's anything to be too concerned about.
I would compare this to a TV-movie or an episode of a TV series, but it's entertaining enough.
Did you know
- TriviaWhen she holds up the phone in the cabin, we see Helen's last name is Phillips, and her phone number is an actual one (not the usual 555 prefix), 424-284-9328. Area code 424 is from the Los Angeles area.
- GoofsHelen answers a cordless phone and eventually runs out of the house. She keeps listening on it even though she is well beyond the range of that type of phone.
- How long is Curvature?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Runtime
- 1h 30m(90 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39:1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content


