An alcoholic drifter must battle withdrawal and psychotic rednecks after he becomes the target of a deranged sporting event.An alcoholic drifter must battle withdrawal and psychotic rednecks after he becomes the target of a deranged sporting event.An alcoholic drifter must battle withdrawal and psychotic rednecks after he becomes the target of a deranged sporting event.
- Directors
- Writers
- Stars
- Awards
- 16 wins & 3 nominations total
Norman De Buck
- Jim
- (as Norman DeBuck)
- Directors
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Seen at the Brussels International Fantastic Film Festival 2017 (website: www.bifff.net). Starting with an original premise, it has even more original developments in its favor. Of course, the prey has slim chances to survive as per the initial setup of the hunting "game", yet it takes some time for the villagers to learn that the prey this time does not give in so easily as in previous years. In a series of scenes, switching from prey to prey, one falling after the other, yet this time with victims on both sides. Luckily for us viewers, it all went differently from previous years. Alcohol plays an important side role, primarily (of course) for main character Warren throughout the running time, but he also makes productive use of alcohol near the finale.
Entertaining throughout, apart from Warren's alcohol addiction and related cold turkey phenomena, and despite the unnecessary violence, the latter not shown in all gory detail yet suggested with not much left to outguess. For example, when someone's head is beaten with a baseball bat, the movement of the bat is clearly shown but not the ultimate effects on the receiving end. A concession towards content advisory ratings?? It won't help, as the whole movie is riddled with unmitigated violence all over. But it is not Horror in the old-fashioned and literal sense of the word, so no dark corners nor ancient buildings, no monsters nor ghosts, only ordinary (yet redneck) people operating in broad daylight (or some at night) with destructive intentions.
All in all, casting and acting make this movie stand out in the first place, in addition to the original plot with many unexpected developments.
Entertaining throughout, apart from Warren's alcohol addiction and related cold turkey phenomena, and despite the unnecessary violence, the latter not shown in all gory detail yet suggested with not much left to outguess. For example, when someone's head is beaten with a baseball bat, the movement of the bat is clearly shown but not the ultimate effects on the receiving end. A concession towards content advisory ratings?? It won't help, as the whole movie is riddled with unmitigated violence all over. But it is not Horror in the old-fashioned and literal sense of the word, so no dark corners nor ancient buildings, no monsters nor ghosts, only ordinary (yet redneck) people operating in broad daylight (or some at night) with destructive intentions.
All in all, casting and acting make this movie stand out in the first place, in addition to the original plot with many unexpected developments.
An alcoholic drifter goes on the run after upsetting meth dealers, he turns up in a small town only to find himself hunted by the locals in a sick game of cat and mouse.
Very professionally made and fantastically directed I was fairly impressed with Happy Hunting early on. The concept though not original was handled well and everything seemed to be going well.
It has pacing issues but nothing too major, the issue really comes with a pointless side story and an ending that will really quite stun you. Why? Because it's bafflingly stupid, really stupid.
Up until that point for the most part I was enjoying Happy Hunting and thought it'd walk away with a comfortable rating, alas that ending is so counterproductive it damages the film.
Such a shame, whoever wrote that needs to sit in the corner and think about what he's done.
The Good:
Very well directed
The Bad:
That ending
Very professionally made and fantastically directed I was fairly impressed with Happy Hunting early on. The concept though not original was handled well and everything seemed to be going well.
It has pacing issues but nothing too major, the issue really comes with a pointless side story and an ending that will really quite stun you. Why? Because it's bafflingly stupid, really stupid.
Up until that point for the most part I was enjoying Happy Hunting and thought it'd walk away with a comfortable rating, alas that ending is so counterproductive it damages the film.
Such a shame, whoever wrote that needs to sit in the corner and think about what he's done.
The Good:
Very well directed
The Bad:
That ending
Had some solid scenes and a decent story with some blood but just wasn't that fun to watch. Should have been better.
Its strangely entertaining to watch, but at the same time god dang awful.
Okay I wrote a medium sized review and tried to submit it and the internet froze up and it apparently got lost so that is lame.
So not writing that again so long story short.
I liked it. End was good! Chris was a great character. Haha. 7/10
So not writing that again so long story short.
I liked it. End was good! Chris was a great character. Haha. 7/10
Did you know
- TriviaDuring filming two crew members where lost while searching for filming locations. They were found 6 hours later dehydrated stating they thought they were only gone 25 minutes.
- GoofsWarren's destination "Mexico" should read backwards when reflected in his sunglasses.
- How long is Happy Hunting?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Runtime
- 1h 31m(91 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.35 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content