IMDb Originals

Ok, the original was lightning in a bottle, and I had no misconception that they could repeat that, so my expectations were low. I was, however, pleasantly surprised because it was fun, enjoyable, and better than I expected even tho it was nothing compared to the original, I had a good time and that's all that matters. It was certainly a nostalgia film, and the bits seemed less "real" than the original,but I still quite enjoyed it.

This is called IMDB Originals. I thought that would mean some level of professional approach from IMDB. But it sounds more like your average youtuber who, for reasons I never understood, thinks that the more you shout the better it gets.... Why? When this has the IMDB brand on it, it should feel and sound like a professional piece of work. Not something made by some random keyed up teenager. This is disappointing......

IMDb is a pretty awesome website, it blows Letterboxd out of the water but, recent changes are starting to lead me to believe otherwise. They f***ed with the ability to view what people have seen, I can't narrow down anything to see what Generic_User_69 has seen in terms of "animated" "comedy" films. I also can't see what I've seen on people's lists without scrolling down the page and, having it have to load every single word. The show is just meh but, don't f*** up watch lists. I had to censor this just to submit it!!!

BTW look up the reviews for grown-ups two it shows obviously it didn't even make 20 on Metacritic out of 100 you got a 4.2 out of 10 and was voted the worst movie of Kevin James and Adam Sandler careerNot saying much also about the originals on I am DB but grown-ups two was just all laugh out loud terrible disgrace grown-ups to someone's got to do some growing up

Lal singh chaddha ,what a movie As we know this is official review of Forrest gump, we don't compare both of them.

Lal singh chaddha indian version as others films adopt.