Set nearly a decade after the finale of the original series, this revival follows Lorelai, Rory and Emily Gilmore through four seasons of change.Set nearly a decade after the finale of the original series, this revival follows Lorelai, Rory and Emily Gilmore through four seasons of change.Set nearly a decade after the finale of the original series, this revival follows Lorelai, Rory and Emily Gilmore through four seasons of change.
- Awards
- 6 nominations total
Browse episodes
Featured reviews
Stop with the musicals!!!!! Ugh!! And give Rory a back bone and a brain!!
Would love to see how it plays out after the ending of this one.
Would love to see how it plays out after the ending of this one.
The overrated Palladinos should have left well enough alone. This overlong (should've been two, not four, episodes) revisits Stars Hollow Connecticut 10 years or so later. Most of the characters are the same. Rory is the most disappointing. She's still floundering career wise, with questionable moral center. She's dragging this guy around for two years who she has no interest in, while being intimate with a man engaged to be married. (A repeat of the Dean sexcapade of years earlier). Lorelei can be proud and disgusted with her at the same time. Other predictable plot devices are thrown in. Emily reigns supreme, as always. Kelly Bishop is an amazing actress. She was the best this series had to offer. It's nice to see many of the old faces, some briefly, but overall, it could and should've been a whole lot better. How Taylor and Kirk survived without being 'eliminated' is amazing. Thankfully no sign of April Nardini.👏. Even the cliffhanger was boring. Time for the Palladinos to close this saga down for good.
I don't know why everyone is complaining so much. This was a GREAT revival and aside from a few scenes that I really could have gone without sitting through, I am super pleased with what they did. I decided long ago, after spending way too many months hating the ending of Buffy, to just enjoy what my favorite writers decide to do with THEIR characters. I'm not saying you have to love it, but when you spend years investing in your favorite towns, characters, and stories, what is the point of being angry with how it ends? Calm down people...Were there dumb scenes? Yes, Were some of the plot lines senseless? Yes. Did a few of the scenes feel forced? Yes. But overall they captured the essence of the characters and their lives in Stars Hollow and I will continue loving GG and hoping for another season!
Very forced, very ridiculous. Rory a whiner with no of the ambition she had throughout the series. She was getting there through the end of the original series and I was hopeful that with the original producers coming back it would be better but not the case. Please no second part....let it go.
I don't get why the rating is so high the miniseries just ruined the series : no Lorelai funny jokes, Rory being irritating as usual and everyone has small parts.
The episode are so long and there are unnecessary filler and the ending why did it leave in a cliffhanger
The episode are so long and there are unnecessary filler and the ending why did it leave in a cliffhanger
Did you know
- TriviaPaul Anka is again portrayed by the same dog actor named Sparky. He's a Polish Lowland Sheepdog and was 14 years old when the revival, A Year in the Life, hit Netflix
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Gilmore Girls: سنة في العمر
- Filming locations
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1h 33m(93 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 16:9 HD
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content