Modi: Three Days on the Wing of Madness

With Modi, from the very beginning it was clear how much of himself Johnny Depp put into this project. Despite it being based on Amedeo Modigliani, I recognized the same speech pattern, topics, irreverence, and also profoundly deep questions posed by the characters as I have seen come from Johnny in either his films as an actor or from himself. It's not a bad thing; it's a style, a personality, a directorial trait - if you will.

The film reminded me a little of "The Rum Diary" (and Hunter S. Thompson of course).

I've heard talk about the wild structure and confusing storyline. It's not typical, but if you're paying attention, it's just fine. I found the film interesting, funny, and heartfelt.

If you enjoy Hunter S. Thompson's work (another film based on one of his novels: "Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas"), Guy Ritchie, Wes Anderson, Captain Jack Sparrow, Johnny Depp himself, artists, and early twentieth century France, you'll likely enjoy this film as well.

Modi is a wild adventure back to 1916 Paris.

I loved the music and upbeat pacing of three days of madness in the life of artist Amedeo Modigliani. Riccardo Scamarcio was born to play Amedeo Modigliani and authentically conveys the soul and passion of this profoundly misunderstood artist who was before his time. The cast of actors/actresses did an incredible job of transforming the story of Modigliani's art into a vivid portrait of his humanity.

I enjoyed this movie so much I want to see it again and loved the sets, scenery, and costume design. As an artist myself, I thoroughly enjoyed this film. Every detail was a delight. Magnificat Johnny Depp!

Loved this film from start to finish. Great acting from the cast and although was only Depps second directorial role, I think he did great with this one. And without going into the movie as to not give any spoilers, it's a must see. It's action packed, beautiful and in places a little sad with some added humour.

The long-awaited Johnny Depp movie Modi. Three days on the wings of madness. Amadeo Modigliani is at the center, accompanied by Caim Soutine and Maurice Utrillo. The movie is rogged, grotesque, deeply personal, and Depp-esque. At one point, Tom Waits sings in Paris 1916. Everything is fine, the performance of the actors is wonderful, they make a great ensemble, but the feeling that this is a concert of old, prosperous rockers does not let go. The 32-year-old Modigliani is played by 45-year-old Ricardo Scamarcio, with two other actors to match. They all play like seasoned musicians would play the songs of their hungry youth. If they were ten years older, it would be more believable.

It is a different kind of film. No real character descriptions, arcs or story. OK, it is chaotic and crazy. I think a lot of journalists have reviewed it as an ordinary film, and therefore been disappointed. But if you take it for what is,you will feel invigorated and cleaner afterwards.

But I think Depp should have a voiceover in the beginning describing Modigliani in some way before that superchaotic beginning, which would be more impactful if the film starts out in a more neutral way. It is difficult to feel for Modigliani otherwise. Even if it is chaotic, you need to feel for Mondigliani to care what happens to him. Plus hearing Depp's sexy voice would be nice.