What Death Leaves Behind

Very dubious about the people leaving high ratings. Like watching paint dry. The non linear timeline instead of being used to good effect simply ruins the flow of the film. A review elsewhere sums it up perfectly:

"A pallid supernatural thriller more fascinated with being "non-linear" in narrative terms than you will be."

Had it been more than an hour and a half long, I would have given up. I persevered to the end and begrudge every wasted minute.

I hate to be hard on all those involved in the making of this film, especially the writer/director and actors, but in the end, this confusing film was less than stellar. Maybe it was the convoluted way in which the story unfolded, or the muted color scheme utilized or the pacing, but in the end, it really felt like an amateur production. Hopefully, the director's next outing won't be so tragic.

Does a kidney have memory cells like the brain? The brain of the donor was declared dead while the kidney took over the memories from the dead brain and kept evolved during the transplant surgery. When it was planted in the receiver, the kidney would be immediately carried the torch of revenge, automatically manipulated the kidney receiver to do something for the dead donor and, if the guy who died violently got a violent history, would he signed up a donation consent for his body organs during his annual renewal of his driver license? I don't think so since he's not a charitable mankind.

What bothered me most is since when a kidney would carry all the memories, bad or good, from a person? If a kidney is like a part of a computer, or even a memory module, do you think when the computer suddenly dies or crashes, or even just shut down abruptly, the memory module or any part of the computer would still able to carry what the computer did before the crash? So, just tell me, do you think one or both of your kidney would carry all the secrets after your sudden demise and instruct the organ receiver to carry out a revenge mission? The kidney would give you nightmares if you refuse to do so. Where's the logic? If the premises won't hold and you still decide to watch this absurd movie, may God(even this guy actually doesn't exist) help you, man.

The film seemed very interesting by reading the synopsis. Discussing how such patients feel, the nature of their experiences and researching the subject deeper is very important. But the movie was boring for me.

Another thing worthy of a study is why people keep watching something they are not really enjoying. I knew the movie would be a waste of time after 30 minutes, but kept watching and regret it. I know many others want their lost time back. Go figure.

Its a film about organ donation, about cell/body memory, severe ptsd, murder and lots of other stuff mixed in a bucket and a lot of flashing dream themes and shown to us as a thriller drama.

its a dark sinister and painfilled story of a life that should be hallelujahed up in the sky, as the lifesaver a transplant can be.

what i come to realise after seeing this movie are a very mixed quality acting, a pretty plotholed story, a nervewrecking score and a not so well told ending to this story. so help me if you can, the grumpy old man says to understand what i really missed out on in this film.