Ke Ku 'Ana

This was by far your worst episode.

Really? Crazy anti-2nd amendment idiot steals assault weapons and holds hostages. He then goes on TV and makes a plea to ban all guns. Attempted hero - NRA member and gun owner - tries to take him down but is a bad shot and complicates matters. In the end, the NRA member is labeled as a buffoon, and the crazed thief/hostage-taker is labeled the hero. Total blatant political move by producers.

It is a proved fact that gun control has caused problems worldwide. It has never helped. And NO, not even in Australia, so don't go there.

FACT: The best defense against armed criminals, is an armed civilian who knows what he's doing.

This episode was total Liberal propaganda. Shame on you Writers & Producers of the show.

Lies and misinformation. Hawaii 5-0 shouldn't stoop to this level. My last episode. Complete liberal propaganda.

The show presents a typical Hollywood flaw, lack of desire to use their platform to teach with truthful data. They want drama and cow-tow to the CNN/AOL lowIQ types that equally lowIQ voters watch/elect.

The Dad's pain we all feel...but the even greater tragedy is the writers missed opportunity to rail on the bullies who triggered the son. Bullies must be stopped. My niece has been bullied terribly and the bullies remain in school. A gun won't solve that but Hollywood could really show bullies up and give parents kids schools support. THAT WOULD TEACH THAT COULD HELP.

Sadly, most news misrepresents facts as do most movies and TV shows.

FACTS: Every state has different gun laws. The states with the strictest laws have the highest population and subsequently the highest crime rates. They also have the highest number of illegal gun ownership and highest gun related crimes.

If we banned legal gun sales nothing much would change for criminals but it may for the rest of us. Maybe if it was really hard to get guns and fewer were manufactured, it might reduce the number in circulation...but that's not going to happen as we have the second amendment.

So, what to do? I haven't a clue. One idea, focus on the causes of gun violence: bullies, gangs, drugs, and the challenges that create the opportunity for those evils to exist.

I would round up the gangs and put them on a remote island to fend. Bullies would be outed on school news-boards. Drug dealers ended. We are too squeamish.

What I can say is that a gun, and I plan to get one, is for safety. We need to train to use it, and I will. As to the liberals going all ballistic (pun intended), they always do. Few liberals have the will to research any topic before forming an opinion. They are, on the whole, weak, unimpressive, power & money addicted fools.

Go to this article on politifact dot com (3/12/2018 factchecks/2018/mar/12/john-faso/do-illegal-gun-owners-commit-most-gun-crime-rep-fa/)

Hollywood elite's liberal agenda on full display, backed by distortion and misrepresentation of facts.

Early on, Danny pulls out the tired liberal line about the 2nd amendment being just for "well regulated militia" which is clearly disputed both by the construction of the sentence (the need for the militia being cited as an example of why the keep and bear arms needs to be protected comes first, not after, the declaration of the right) and the deliberate change of wording (it says the "right of the people" NOT "the right of the militia"). If the drafters had meant it just for the militia, they would NOT have granted the right to "the people" as in "We the People".

Secondly, they keep talking "assault rifles" as being legal, but the weapons they use for this discussion are fully automatic weapons which are already illegal. What the gun control lobby typically refers to as an "assault rifle (political term, not a real gun description) is simply a .22 or similar rifle which has cosmetic parts added to make it look like a military rifle. It is totally incapable of the "spray" firing depicted in this show. One trigger pull = one round fired. Just like a handgun or any other rifle or shotgun. True "military weapons" have the ability (rarely used in battle) for emptying the entire magazine at once by holding the trigger down. This is what Hollywood usually shows, but not what the civilian version does.

The entire concept of the father of a mass shooter, being so overcome by grief as to become a mass shooter himself to protest against guns is so ludicrous that only Hollywood could come up with it.

I find it particularly idiotic, but all too commonplace that Hollywood, which makes it's fortune glorifying gun violence, constantly seeks to place the blame on the guns and on legal, responsible owners, instead of on an entertainment culture that has spent billions of dollars portraying violent movie characters as heroes!

I won't get into the gun control debate. We all have our own viewpoint on the matter and nothing said here will change anyone's mind. However I will comment that the memories of the man with his little boy and how things really ended made me cry. Beautifully done. Terribly sad. I was also surprised to find out that Flippa has a great voice. The second story-line with Adam was also very nice.