A college student, who sees a UFO, uses his exceptional math skills to investigate the sighting with his friends while the FBI follows closely behind.A college student, who sees a UFO, uses his exceptional math skills to investigate the sighting with his friends while the FBI follows closely behind.A college student, who sees a UFO, uses his exceptional math skills to investigate the sighting with his friends while the FBI follows closely behind.
Benjamin Beatty
- Lee
- (as Ben Beatty)
Cece Abbey
- Young Girl
- (as Cecelia Abbey)
Ted J. Weil
- Airport Detainee
- (as Ted Weil)
A.J. Ransom
- Derek (age 8)
- (as Aiden Ransom)
David Heckel
- Hal LaPierre
- (as Dave Heckle)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Yeah, it's been done before in Close Encounters, sort of, but it's quite a different take. There is a Eureka!! bonding moment between the professor and student about the wavelength of radio signals emitted by hydrogen and it's kind of touching.
It's nice see college students that really seem like college students. Andersen does a very convincing job of a college professor.
One major annoyance is the very last line, when the student is asked what all this means, and he answers "we are not alone." Well, DUH, by this point of the movie. Bad choice there.
It's nice see college students that really seem like college students. Andersen does a very convincing job of a college professor.
One major annoyance is the very last line, when the student is asked what all this means, and he answers "we are not alone." Well, DUH, by this point of the movie. Bad choice there.
This was certainly no big budget Hollywood blockbuster, but a fairly decent and interesting film that held my attention.
It didn't have any action or thrills, but the rather original concept behind a UFO sighting was enough to keep me well interested.
This is novice director and writer Ryan Eslinger's fourth film installment, and he did a very good job.
The score was a little too obvious throughout the entire film, and pausing it in certain scenes would have created better tension for the viewer. The pacing and length were just right. The C & B grade cast performed fairly well, but I feel Alex Sharp should have not been cast as the lead. Perhaps someone more seasoned would have made this film more appealing. It was however a pleasant surprise to see Gillian Anderson a.k.a X-Files' Scully, and she of course nailed her role.
I can see many people slamming this film, especially if they hate math, and because it's not your typical Hollywood production. Had there been narrating, it would have made for a great documentary type film. This felt more like one of those "based on a true story" films. Nothing spectacular, but still interesting enough to watch and make you think.
Nevertheless, still enjoyable and refreshing to see something different, even if not Hollywood-ish. Would I recommend it? Yes. Would I see it again? Probably not.
It didn't have any action or thrills, but the rather original concept behind a UFO sighting was enough to keep me well interested.
This is novice director and writer Ryan Eslinger's fourth film installment, and he did a very good job.
The score was a little too obvious throughout the entire film, and pausing it in certain scenes would have created better tension for the viewer. The pacing and length were just right. The C & B grade cast performed fairly well, but I feel Alex Sharp should have not been cast as the lead. Perhaps someone more seasoned would have made this film more appealing. It was however a pleasant surprise to see Gillian Anderson a.k.a X-Files' Scully, and she of course nailed her role.
I can see many people slamming this film, especially if they hate math, and because it's not your typical Hollywood production. Had there been narrating, it would have made for a great documentary type film. This felt more like one of those "based on a true story" films. Nothing spectacular, but still interesting enough to watch and make you think.
Nevertheless, still enjoyable and refreshing to see something different, even if not Hollywood-ish. Would I recommend it? Yes. Would I see it again? Probably not.
Enjoyed this slow burn which inspite of being so doesn't bore you for a minute and keeps you engaged. Thoughtful, geeky fun.
Boy, I haven't had chills like this since "Contact".
If you like well written movies, movies that leave you on the edge of your seat from the get-go - this is it!
If you like movies that are INTELLIGENT and push the envelope of interesting and well written, this is your movie!
Acting is superb, writing is superb - and content is mesmerizing.
This movie does what so many big budget films want to do at a fraction of the cost!
Do yourself a favor and watch it. You won't be sorry!
If you like well written movies, movies that leave you on the edge of your seat from the get-go - this is it!
If you like movies that are INTELLIGENT and push the envelope of interesting and well written, this is your movie!
Acting is superb, writing is superb - and content is mesmerizing.
This movie does what so many big budget films want to do at a fraction of the cost!
Do yourself a favor and watch it. You won't be sorry!
As a physicist and a SciFi fan, I rather enjoyed the movie. It was very approachable in terms of dialog and the science seemed reasonable and accurate. I would highly recommend this if you like a thoughtful SciFi approach to UFOs.
Did you know
- TriviaLoosely based on events of November 7, 2006, when multiple eyewitnesses at Chicago O'Hare International Airport (including control tower personnel and flight crews) reported an Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon (UAP) hovering over Gate C17.
- GoofsDuring news reports the news stations call letters all begin with a K. In Cincinnati all stations begin with a W.
- Quotes
Professor Hendricks: [talking to Derek about UFO signal and conspiracy theory] You don't automatically jump to the most extreme explanations. You analyze the reasonable ones first.
- How long is UFO?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Runtime
- 1h 28m(88 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39:1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content