IMDb RATING
3.6/10
1.2K
YOUR RATING
A storm is coming. No one could predict it. No one can measure it.Now one family must survive it. You can't come in from the cold.A storm is coming. No one could predict it. No one can measure it.Now one family must survive it. You can't come in from the cold.A storm is coming. No one could predict it. No one can measure it.Now one family must survive it. You can't come in from the cold.
- Awards
- 1 win total
Lauren K. Robek
- Candace Summers
- (as Kirsten Robek)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
3.61.2K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
Now called 100 degrees below zero
I wish there was a zero. This has to be the worst film I have ever watched. The packaging looks good enough to buy. Ops...I did. The plot was written buy a 3 year old and the best bit of acting was the dead blackbird. In the end I watched it just to pick faults of which there are many. Please don't be fooled by the first 3 minutes, it goes down hill quicker than the Titanic.
Ridiculous
As a Canadian the Hollywood idea of cold is so stupid. People with their coat opened, no gloves, mittens, no snow pants, or even a scarf over their face. And what about their feet?
Plus the cold weather can brake the windows !!!
Plus the cold weather can brake the windows !!!
Cold Turkey.....
.... and that it is what it's like going through when watching this.
I know we are currently suffering extremes of weather, which the producers of this film are exploiting, but this is a bit over the top, the "special effects" are not so special, they keep repeating a satellite image of a white cloud with a hole in it, exactly the same - no movement, repeating it several times throughout the film, one scene involves the main hero burying himself in a snow hole to survive being frozen, with a candle which burns the oxygen in the hole uo, so either he should have frozen to death or died of lack of oxygen, but he was not even that cold when he came out.
The acting is poor, the dialogue terrible, the emotional scenes look put on, which of course they are (real actors make the emotional scenes look real), continuity is not good, scenes where there are frozen people show the area frost free, it would take a while to defrost! And despite recently been frozen, the roads have wet puddles, not ice!
The music is poor, and sound effects are annoying.
I am looking for the good points, maybe the story is good, but the screenplay has ruined it.
Poor, interesting, but poor. Like a disaster movie from the 70's but without star actors.
I know we are currently suffering extremes of weather, which the producers of this film are exploiting, but this is a bit over the top, the "special effects" are not so special, they keep repeating a satellite image of a white cloud with a hole in it, exactly the same - no movement, repeating it several times throughout the film, one scene involves the main hero burying himself in a snow hole to survive being frozen, with a candle which burns the oxygen in the hole uo, so either he should have frozen to death or died of lack of oxygen, but he was not even that cold when he came out.
The acting is poor, the dialogue terrible, the emotional scenes look put on, which of course they are (real actors make the emotional scenes look real), continuity is not good, scenes where there are frozen people show the area frost free, it would take a while to defrost! And despite recently been frozen, the roads have wet puddles, not ice!
The music is poor, and sound effects are annoying.
I am looking for the good points, maybe the story is good, but the screenplay has ruined it.
Poor, interesting, but poor. Like a disaster movie from the 70's but without star actors.
Save as many as you can...
Yes, I wanted to save as many as I can ... from watching this absolute stinker. So if you've seen "The Day After Tomorrow" you know the general deal. There's really only one difference between the two movies - Tomorrow doesn't want to make you gouge your eyes out with an ice pick.
Having a science background, I am mildly entertained when concepts follow the general laws of physics. Luckily I didn't have to worry here because there was no science to evaluate as nothing made sense. Again and again the laws were broken with clear abandonment. It might have been helpful to have this improve the story, develop a character or idea, but alas no
I don't want to see any of the actors again as none of them performed with any degree of conviction, except maybe the paycheck. I rather pity any of the cast that took shares in the movie in lieu of payment - unlikely they'd have got bus fare.
To make it fair, I gave 1 star for committing this to celluloid, probably against the advice of family, friends and anyone who actually read the script before committing to star in it, and another star for the cast surviving to the end of the movie with straight faces. I've seen better acting in commercials.
Having a science background, I am mildly entertained when concepts follow the general laws of physics. Luckily I didn't have to worry here because there was no science to evaluate as nothing made sense. Again and again the laws were broken with clear abandonment. It might have been helpful to have this improve the story, develop a character or idea, but alas no
I don't want to see any of the actors again as none of them performed with any degree of conviction, except maybe the paycheck. I rather pity any of the cast that took shares in the movie in lieu of payment - unlikely they'd have got bus fare.
To make it fair, I gave 1 star for committing this to celluloid, probably against the advice of family, friends and anyone who actually read the script before committing to star in it, and another star for the cast surviving to the end of the movie with straight faces. I've seen better acting in commercials.
General idea is nice but the execution...
The movie doesn't make any sense from beginning to end. The script is crazy bad. At the beginning there was a little bit of action. But every single thing was so obvious. I have to say I like the general idea of the movie I mean that's why I bought it. But the execution was really sad... I really think with a slightly better script and little bit more scientific backup the movie could be a average movie. And also I have to say the visual effects where incredibly bad and unfortunately there were too many of them... also that the ice storm has a sound like a monster in a horror movie I mean come on it's a storm not a monster.
But I have to say are probably worse movies out there so I won't give this movie a 1 Star Review rather a 3 star one.
But I have to say are probably worse movies out there so I won't give this movie a 1 Star Review rather a 3 star one.
Did you know
- TriviaThis is set in Alaska USA, but at 15:55 the cyclists pass a sign showing Pemberton Health Centre. The Canadian spelling of "Center" tells us where the outside locations were filmed.
- How long is Cold Zone?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- 100° Below Zero
- Filming locations
- Pemberton British Columbia, Canada(final credits page)
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1h 25m(85 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.78 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content





