Segfault

Again, 6.9 rating for a 3.9 one? Please audit the rating. The first half hour can cut for 5 mins, why waste so much time on nothing to delivery? Just a crazy woman wandering for first 30 mins, oh gosh.....

Amnesiacs rejoice! This movie starts off slow but is unable to keep pace and slows to a crawl. You can doze off at any point confident you will not miss a thing.

The basic premise is a lousy actress awakens in a motel room and tries to figure out what is going on. It soon becomes apparent that the answer is: nothing. Nothing is going on. Nevertheless, the lousy actress remains stumped for the bulk of the film.

The lead actress is terrible. I assume the only reason she got the part is because she produced and co-wrote (someone wrote this?!) this mess.

One star for an experiment. Zero stars because it should have ended up on the cutting room floor. One star.

Lame movie, definitely not a 6 star. I can't say anything other than font waste your time with it.

And some, like this one, fail spectacularly and abysmally. How anyone imagined that this was a good idea is difficult to fathom. The experiment might have had a remote chance of being moderately adequate if they had "cast" actual, even barely semi-competent actors with some kind of improvisational ability instead of apparently recruiting random laymen off the street. Avoid.

I don't understand why this film has such a low rating (currently 3.7). It is fast-paced and tense from the beginning, as the main character is plunged into a frightening environment and pursued by people without understanding what is happening to her. The audience is similarly unsure of what is going on, which makes for an intriguing situation and an exciting denouement as events unfold. The actor who plays the main character was apparently told nothing about the plot or what was going to happen to her, which makes the emotions she displays on screen very realistic. Ignore the reviews and watch this film.