Life, Liberty & Levin

Following the advice of my mother, us you can't say something nice .... Although he speaks English, the words form sentences of a non thinking sycophant What a joke..

I love Mark Levin, not only is his a Constitutional host but he talks about stuff that no one else will. He wants to get to the truth & get our country back to what the founders believed, even if it goes against what society says is right, he will say & prove what needs to be said. Upsets me when FOX interrupts his show & they offer no way to finish the show from where they cut in. I believe Levin should be on 5 to 7 days a week! Thank you Mark Levin for being honest, dependable & always in search of the truth. God bless America

If you want to be educated on the fundamentals of Americanism and constitutional principles, then sit back and watch Mark Levin as he lays out the principles of our founding fathers and American exceptionalism .

From the first show, Levin has dominated his Sunday Night Time slot. For good reason, his guests are stellar. Levin, a Constitutional expert, has earned the nickname, "The Great One". He is immensely smart, plain spoken, and direct.

But, his quality of guests are where this program really shines. A few include, Climatologist Dr. Patrick Michaels, who provided counterpoint to why the world is not going to end in 12 years, George Gilder, technology expert, discussing life after Google, and Brandon Straka, a gay civil rights leader, who left the Democrat party and started the #Walkaway movement. My favorite episode so far had a guest, I can't remember his name, who was an expert on electromagnetic pulse and the US electrical grid, discussing how we were vulnerable to these sort of attacks.

I record every episode so I can review them multiple times, if needed, as some episodes are packed with scientific or other types of intellectual material that I enjoy reviewing on occasion.

Might not agree with his politics, but he does back up his assertions with case law and constitution. He can build a case and back it up with passionate regurgitation of his research and legal studies. I often don't like the logical conclusions of his summaries, but I also don't like when defense lawyers win a case after the represented perp looks guilty to me in the court of public opinion.