Confessions of a Serial Killer with Piers Morgan

Two episodes in, and both killers claim innocence offering little insight into their own motives etc. Whats the point, very frustrating to watch.

I don't hope Piers go around calling himself a journalist... What a moral bigot with no intentions other than to promote himself at the expense of people already in prison. This show is utterly one-sided and makes no effort to uncover anything.

As I say in my title, this is a terrific idea for a series, but it has a few shortcomings in the execution. However, I'm only taking up one here, because it's the seam coming apart issue. Who in his/her right mind thought Piers would be the man for this job? You need a human being for his role, not the well dressed imitation, sorry, irritation. I am certain there are careers well suited the personality and character that goes by the name Piers Morgan, but appearing in front of a camera and speaking to an audience isn't one of them. He would make an outstanding professional hermit. Or a lighthouse custodian, but I don't know if that's a thing any more. Aha, it just came to me, after professional hermit, CCTV screen watcher. Second choice, mind, but a really good one.

It is a fine line that a journalist must toe when interviewing people of this caliber. Piers managed to alienate and aggravate both interviewees . The background information was interesting but to see footage of the men walking off camera was a waste of time.

I never write reviews, but Piers has irritated me so much with his interviewing technique that I had to write one. He basically just annoys the hell out of the killers until they get up and leave. Even when interviewing law enforcement or people connected to the victims, he just uses loaded qustions to get them to deliver the answer he wants. It all just seems like someone trying to promote themselves instead of get into the mind of these killers. Serial killers=bad, so, Piers telling killers that they are bad means Piers=good. Afraid not you goddamn donkey.