Mr. K
- 2024
- 1h 34m
After spending the night in a remote hotel, Mr. K is stuck in a claustrophobic nightmare when he discovers that he can't leave the building.After spending the night in a remote hotel, Mr. K is stuck in a claustrophobic nightmare when he discovers that he can't leave the building.After spending the night in a remote hotel, Mr. K is stuck in a claustrophobic nightmare when he discovers that he can't leave the building.
- Director
- Writer
- Stars
- Awards
- 8 wins & 6 nominations total
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
5.41.7K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
Think of Wes Anderson but without the heart.
The opening transition and narration are clever, touching, and deftly done. Bravo. I'd like to say it sets the audience up for the rest of the viewing experience. But sadly the film does never again do anything like it.
The movie looks great and all the elements are there for a remarkable film experience, or at least a memorable one. But instead we get weak uninteresting quirky characters and an endless sequence of nonsensical scenes. At first I was hopeful and intrigued because, surely, there was going to be a pay off. The characters -- all except Crispin Glover's -- appeared to be in on the 'joke' and such elaborate costumes, sets, and staging must be going somewhere. Right? Nope.
More than once I was struck by the impression that I was watching a Tech Demo. I wasn't there for the story or the characters but rather to see this neat thing that the maker did. But not actually a film.
To be honest I stopped watching at some point before the end. I beyond caring about what was going on on the screen at that point that I don't think even the greatest movie ending ever filmed could have re-ignited my interest. But to be clear I have no idea how it ends. Or if it even does.
If it was an exercise in surreal wackiness that could at least be entertaining. But as another reviewer points out it never crosses over into that territory.
Mr. Glover is woefully underused. No doubt the makers were hoping to bring some of his 'character' to the role, but the writing never gives him a chance. They could probably have cast anyone that can muster a lost, bemused expression and the film would not have suffered.
The sets are great. The hotel feels like a place that's a few steps from reality right from the start. But not once was I convinced that any of the characters were an organic part of it. They were just props with the sole purpose of contributing to the atmosphere. This does not a film make.
The movie looks great and all the elements are there for a remarkable film experience, or at least a memorable one. But instead we get weak uninteresting quirky characters and an endless sequence of nonsensical scenes. At first I was hopeful and intrigued because, surely, there was going to be a pay off. The characters -- all except Crispin Glover's -- appeared to be in on the 'joke' and such elaborate costumes, sets, and staging must be going somewhere. Right? Nope.
More than once I was struck by the impression that I was watching a Tech Demo. I wasn't there for the story or the characters but rather to see this neat thing that the maker did. But not actually a film.
To be honest I stopped watching at some point before the end. I beyond caring about what was going on on the screen at that point that I don't think even the greatest movie ending ever filmed could have re-ignited my interest. But to be clear I have no idea how it ends. Or if it even does.
If it was an exercise in surreal wackiness that could at least be entertaining. But as another reviewer points out it never crosses over into that territory.
Mr. Glover is woefully underused. No doubt the makers were hoping to bring some of his 'character' to the role, but the writing never gives him a chance. They could probably have cast anyone that can muster a lost, bemused expression and the film would not have suffered.
The sets are great. The hotel feels like a place that's a few steps from reality right from the start. But not once was I convinced that any of the characters were an organic part of it. They were just props with the sole purpose of contributing to the atmosphere. This does not a film make.
One of the better films seen this year.
I was a bit scared after reading some negative reviews, but it wasn't founded. After seeing some really bad movies like 'Reflet dans un diamant noir' and 'the other way around' this was a breath of fresh air. I decided to give it a chance after reading that it won a prize at a fantasy film festival. That's a genre that always produces good movies, and those fans have a much better taste than your average media specialists! A good movie recently was 'Black Dog', from China! Wake up, USA, do they only make series to stream these days? At first the hotel guest is focused on finding the exit, but just like in reality, real life intervenes...
The movie is about people who say and do anything that fits their beliefs or their own behavior... And not in a woke way.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with the acting, even the dog does well, and there are several intriguing characters. The ending may not be much, but the rest of the movie more than makes up for it. Very atmospheric, nice moments with music, also the choice to make the main character a magician gives the whole thing extra cachet. Recommended!
There is absolutely nothing wrong with the acting, even the dog does well, and there are several intriguing characters. The ending may not be much, but the rest of the movie more than makes up for it. Very atmospheric, nice moments with music, also the choice to make the main character a magician gives the whole thing extra cachet. Recommended!
A contemplative irittating experience
Having a hard time to make a comment here but the film sort of requires a response. Is it worth watching and if so will you actually not be forced to fast forward it every so often because it is both fascinating and totally irritating all at once. If I have to make a recommendation then it is to watch this on a computer so you can ado the fast forward because if you are trapped in a cinema it will really piss you off. OK. The overall quality of film making is actually quite good. The set is a hit for sure and the premise of the cage hotel is also OK. Where the film fails is in the tempo and in the lack of editing to make it flow better but that was most likely a challenge that the director was battling with himself. The acting and the choreography of the people movements in various parts of the film is very good. There a good number of moments when the viewer is seriously challenged as to what the hell is going on and what or how one should be interpreting the film which makes for a fairly exhausting experience which I actually liked as it is not often that a film these days reaches the level of cerebral impact. Does the film have a resolution and does it make sense and does it serve the rest of the film well? These questions are for you to answer. I do not wish to spoil anything that you may experience or feel.
A movie that seems made for Crispin Glover.
This movie is what happens when everyone behind the camera get full freedom to make the best movie they can make.
Everything is wonderfully made, from small details in the background, light and sound and special effect department.
In the end, you have a mix of Terry Gilliam/Lovecraft and Kafka. The people asking for financial support to this movie deserve a payraise - they seem to have called and knocked on every door and institution in Europe, and i am glad they did.
I am happy they included the first 30 seconds of the movie, and the last 30 seconds as it confirmed my theory on what it allaccomplish were about. I might be wrong, but don´t think i am. There are other movies on the same theme - but i think this is the best one i have seen so far.
This movie makes me think of the value of work, partner and friendship i have in life, something few movies can brag about.
Naturally, Crispin Glover is perfect in this role. Someone that can play a really weak character, like he did in Back to the future, and also the bad guy like he did in American Gods - fits my description of a really good actor.
If someone ever doubt movies as an expression of meaningful art - show them this movie.
Everything is wonderfully made, from small details in the background, light and sound and special effect department.
In the end, you have a mix of Terry Gilliam/Lovecraft and Kafka. The people asking for financial support to this movie deserve a payraise - they seem to have called and knocked on every door and institution in Europe, and i am glad they did.
I am happy they included the first 30 seconds of the movie, and the last 30 seconds as it confirmed my theory on what it allaccomplish were about. I might be wrong, but don´t think i am. There are other movies on the same theme - but i think this is the best one i have seen so far.
This movie makes me think of the value of work, partner and friendship i have in life, something few movies can brag about.
Naturally, Crispin Glover is perfect in this role. Someone that can play a really weak character, like he did in Back to the future, and also the bad guy like he did in American Gods - fits my description of a really good actor.
If someone ever doubt movies as an expression of meaningful art - show them this movie.
Weird and surreal, but enjoyable
Well, I enjoyed it.
The best comparison that I can make is that this film is a mix of Gormenghast, Neverwhere, Brazil with a bit of David Cronenberg thrown in.
Crispin Glover is always a strange actor, and his Mr K is difficult to empathise with. The film is full of weird and irrational characters. Nothing makes sense, and the ending provides no answers. The viewer is left to interpret the events in their own way.
If you enjoy surreal trips down the rabbit hole, where nothing makes sense, then I suggest that this is worth your time, despite some dodgy pacing and jarring tonal changes.
However, if you prefer simple stories where everything makes sense and is explained, then steer well clear of this movie.
The best comparison that I can make is that this film is a mix of Gormenghast, Neverwhere, Brazil with a bit of David Cronenberg thrown in.
Crispin Glover is always a strange actor, and his Mr K is difficult to empathise with. The film is full of weird and irrational characters. Nothing makes sense, and the ending provides no answers. The viewer is left to interpret the events in their own way.
If you enjoy surreal trips down the rabbit hole, where nothing makes sense, then I suggest that this is worth your time, despite some dodgy pacing and jarring tonal changes.
However, if you prefer simple stories where everything makes sense and is explained, then steer well clear of this movie.
Did you know
- ConnectionsReferences The Trial (1962)
- How long is Mr. K?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Gross US & Canada
- $16,056
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $1,692
- Oct 12, 2025
- Gross worldwide
- $153,594
- Runtime
- 1h 34m(94 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39:1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content







