Alt-Right: Age of Rage

The alt-right movement is a worthy subject of a documentary as the rise of hate crimes and hate group activity thanks to a President that supports them tacitly or at least has worked with advisors that support them like Bannon. (Look at all the 1 star reviews from people who clearly haven't watched this film). Unfortunately, this documentary is not the documentary I was looking for to help me learn more about them and efforts to push back against their raciest speech and actions. It mostly consists of going between various alt-right spokesman like Spencer and Mciness as well as anti-facists like Daryle Lamont Jenkins. As other reviewers have suggested, some background information would be useful for context. Are there any groups in the middle The closest is Southern Poverty Law center, Mark Potok, who I found the most reasonable in this film. I would have liked some person or even a voice to help tie everything together. Occasional text transitions to time and place don't quite do enough. As a 99 cent rental from iTunes, I don't regret watching it. I just wish it had been a little more cohesive and useful. This documentary is a place holder until something better comes along.

I can see where someone on the right anywhere would not like this documentary since it truthfully calls them out. There are good interviews and the makers even make a solid effort to allow alt-right figures to speak for themselves. There may be degrees of hate on the right but this program shows how its all tied together. The only justification that the right puts forth that makes any sense is free speech but it doesn't take away from their ugliness or the right of decent people everywhere to oppose their bigotry and white supremacist views.

Good documentary, show both sides, I would just like to hear more from some of the subjects like Gavin our Milo, but it is really interesting regardless

A strong start with high production value deteriorates into repeated political messaging. After the first hour I was just waiting for this one to end.

I am no expert in the Alt Right movement or Richard Spenser, so I was pleasantly surprised with the opening of the movie, as it looked like I would get some new insights. As the documentary progresses it turns out to be more of a collage of monologues made by Antifa activist Daryl Lamont Jenkins.

The messaging will be completely clear to the viewers once the movie ends: Alt-Right is "kind of" neo-Nazi or outright neo-Nazi, while Antifa are a democratic opposition which violent acts are never questioned.

My frustration grew as I watched how facts were distorted and the double standard of the makers became more and more clear. Let me point to some examples:

• Richard Cohen of the Southern Poverty Law Center talks about threats to his life (victim) while doxing (revealing private information publicly) about his opponents and Lamont Jenkins thinks it is good that people in Alt Right lose their job, when he exposes them.

• Antifa activist is doxed by Alt Right (victim) and he dresses up in protective combat gear when going to a protest against a completely peaceful closed Alt Right conference. He is in a fight, that he most likely started himself, and is then saluted by Antifa including Daryl Lamont Jenkins when released by police while his victim is in the hospital.

• Antifa activist does not want to speak about what she knows about which masked Antifa thug who violently attacked Spenser while he was being interviewed. This violence is somehow justified, okay or even funny.

• The failure of the Charlottesville police to stop violence is somehow manipulated into being a police support for Alt Right, while in fact it is clear from the documentary, that anti-Alt Right protesters instigated the violence. Focus then turns to the 20-year-old Alt Right supporter who rammed into a crowd with his car leaving a woman dead. Trump is then portrayed as a "kind of" neo-Nazi supporter for condemning violence "on many sides".

• Dangerous and scary background music are played when Alt Right speaks. When Lamont Jenkins incites the crowd with his chanting that they repeat, heroic music is played.

• Daryl Lamont Jenkins are the hero of the movie presenting one up close and personal monologue after another for the audience. In the end of the movie, this constant preaching was almost unbearable to watch. Richard Spenser, on the other hand, is shot from a distance and without the same coherent point of view.

My criticism should in no way be confused with support for the Alt Right movement, but I am on the other hand left with the clear impression, that the documentary lacks credibility in its portrayal of the movement.

For me it is absolutely absurd, that assault rifle armed private militia shows up to provide security to a demonstration, but contrary to the documentary's narrative I found myself thinking that it was properly good they appeared, as the director seamed apologetic to violent Antifa protesters.

The first half an hour is definitely the strongest part in regards to insight and production value. The last part of the documentary is week. Half an hour could easily been edited out.

I find it interesting that the negative reviews of this movie are from both sides of the political spectrum. Some are angry that anyone would give someone like Richard Spencer this much face time, and others are angry that Antifa isn't shown in more of a negative light. The film does portray the new alt right as tantamount to Neo-Nazism, but I found it interesting to learn that this is something Spencer and his followers refute. Ultimately this film presents us with the argument of if the rise of white supremacy in the United States is something to be seriously worried about, or is something to ignore and not give attention to. I wasn't bored watching this movie. It was well edited, interesting enough, and overall worth watching.