World War II-era drama centered on the lives of ordinary people affected by the war.World War II-era drama centered on the lives of ordinary people affected by the war.World War II-era drama centered on the lives of ordinary people affected by the war.
- Awards
- 6 nominations total
Browse episodes
Featured reviews
Nice to see the polish side of the story and how horrifying it all was. Glad the bbc used well known polish actors rather than British actors with accents. Lends an authenticity to proceedings. Well acted throughout and great to see heavyweights like Helen hunt and Sean bean and Lesley Manville in tv
Really amazed at amount of critical reviewers who base their criticism of a drama on history. This is a fictional account of some personal experiences of WWII not a documentary. Using your criteria, then all drama must be reviewed in terms of history and condemned if not absolutely accurate. Also, amazed that some reviewers are concerned about the bad depiction of Nazis and the display of blatant homophobic remarks as well as using the typical PC attack. I do see homophobic remarks in many reviews of any movie/series that has major gay roles. Looks like lots of right-wing and possibly Nazi nuts reviewing this but I guess that is to be expected when WWII related presentations are involved. But even with all this negativity, it has a decent rating because this series is well presented and acted. Great dramatic presentation of personal experiences and the challenges and heartache they faced in a horrific crisis.
I thoroughly enjoyed the first episode and am already feel empathy towards some of the characters and look forward to seeing how their lives pan out. I particularly liked that you can see the human drama play out against the backdrop of war and not vice versa. Hope it stays this way and l shall look forward to Sunday nights.
1/10.... reallly?
Poor acting... really?
You are on this forum, as am I, for ONE reason - to convey the cinematic qualities of what we have before us. This is NOT a historical debate forum. I'm glad we got that out of the way....
World on Fire delivers. It doesn't deliver historical accuracy - but it delivers "the sense of the moment" and it does so pretty damn well.
This is a half full glas and it's contents are pretty tasty. Any review below 6/10 cannot be taken seriously.
Enjoy.
You are on this forum, as am I, for ONE reason - to convey the cinematic qualities of what we have before us. This is NOT a historical debate forum. I'm glad we got that out of the way....
World on Fire delivers. It doesn't deliver historical accuracy - but it delivers "the sense of the moment" and it does so pretty damn well.
This is a half full glas and it's contents are pretty tasty. Any review below 6/10 cannot be taken seriously.
Enjoy.
Below the line is my original post.
I've just finished episode 4, and I've lowered my rating to a "2/10". Unbelievable that they've obviously used writers that have *zero* knowledge of basic warfare, or tactics of WWII. The British soldiers are portrayed as unorganised idiots that are so happy-go-lucky that they keep getting surprised by Germans because they don't even post sentries! For the record, at the beginning of the war, Brits were fierce warriors, even though severely outgunned.
The Germans in Poland keep falling for the female bait to their doom, but there's no retaliation against the innocent citizens?!
Oh, it's getting very, very bad, and not even Sean Bean can help this one.
I'll keep watching, but *only* because there's three episodes left.
Original.....................................................................................V
I was quite stoked for this after the first episode, even excusing some of the bad writing. I gave it a generous "9".
After the second episode, it's obvious that the men are weak, bumbling incompetents.
All the women are the leaders, strong, defiant, organized, and in charge.
Too bad that Hollywood has corrupted British film makers...
My rating slid to "5" stars, I'll adjust as necessary as the series progresses.
I've just finished episode 4, and I've lowered my rating to a "2/10". Unbelievable that they've obviously used writers that have *zero* knowledge of basic warfare, or tactics of WWII. The British soldiers are portrayed as unorganised idiots that are so happy-go-lucky that they keep getting surprised by Germans because they don't even post sentries! For the record, at the beginning of the war, Brits were fierce warriors, even though severely outgunned.
The Germans in Poland keep falling for the female bait to their doom, but there's no retaliation against the innocent citizens?!
Oh, it's getting very, very bad, and not even Sean Bean can help this one.
I'll keep watching, but *only* because there's three episodes left.
Original.....................................................................................V
I was quite stoked for this after the first episode, even excusing some of the bad writing. I gave it a generous "9".
After the second episode, it's obvious that the men are weak, bumbling incompetents.
All the women are the leaders, strong, defiant, organized, and in charge.
Too bad that Hollywood has corrupted British film makers...
My rating slid to "5" stars, I'll adjust as necessary as the series progresses.
Discover the nominees, explore red carpet fashion, and cast your ballot!
Did you know
- TriviaThe weaponry in the Danzig Post Office is, in part, wrong. The Poles used their version of the American Browning Automatic Rifle (BAR). The program armed them with British BREN guns.
- GoofsThe characters of Kasia and her mother are listed in the credits with the surname Tomaszeski. However, as women their name in Polish would be Tomaszeska.
- How many seasons does World on Fire have?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Languages
- Also known as
- 戰火浮生
- Filming locations
- Lytham St Annes, Lancashire, England, UK(on location)
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 57m
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content