A chronicle of the unconditional love between a mother, Rachel, and her daughter, Chantal, from 1958 to the present day, which is endangered by an unsteady and manipulative father, Philippe.A chronicle of the unconditional love between a mother, Rachel, and her daughter, Chantal, from 1958 to the present day, which is endangered by an unsteady and manipulative father, Philippe.A chronicle of the unconditional love between a mother, Rachel, and her daughter, Chantal, from 1958 to the present day, which is endangered by an unsteady and manipulative father, Philippe.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Awards
- 1 win & 7 nominations total
Gaël Kamilindi
- Franck
- (as Gaël Kamilindi de la Comédie Française)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
I did not seek out this film.
Watched it one Sunday afternoon on BBC iPlayer.
I was feeling unwell and thought it looked gentle enough. There was no write up, so did not know what to expect.
It was a fine, intelligent film; Rachel was a wonderful character, I liked and understood her. It is this factor that sustains the film throughout. The two hours or so passed quickly; one becomes heavily invested in the central character.
One is left with no doubt about Phillippe from the start, he is not ordinary and totally narcissistic. Therein lies the reason for, what sometimes seems like, his unfathomable hold over Rachel. This is not about class differences or anything as mundane as that keeping lovers apart, this is about a true narcissist's manipulation of a trusting and loving girl / woman.
When adult Chantel, Rachel and Philippe's daughter, confronts Rachel at the end, Rachel's answer is believable; she simply did not conceive that the problems in their mother and daughter relationship, during Chantel's teenage years, was anything other than that she, Rachel, was simply not good enough.
I am trying not to give anything away, just watch the film and see it play out. Just remember that it is Rachel's life you are watching unfolding.
Watched it one Sunday afternoon on BBC iPlayer.
I was feeling unwell and thought it looked gentle enough. There was no write up, so did not know what to expect.
It was a fine, intelligent film; Rachel was a wonderful character, I liked and understood her. It is this factor that sustains the film throughout. The two hours or so passed quickly; one becomes heavily invested in the central character.
One is left with no doubt about Phillippe from the start, he is not ordinary and totally narcissistic. Therein lies the reason for, what sometimes seems like, his unfathomable hold over Rachel. This is not about class differences or anything as mundane as that keeping lovers apart, this is about a true narcissist's manipulation of a trusting and loving girl / woman.
When adult Chantel, Rachel and Philippe's daughter, confronts Rachel at the end, Rachel's answer is believable; she simply did not conceive that the problems in their mother and daughter relationship, during Chantel's teenage years, was anything other than that she, Rachel, was simply not good enough.
I am trying not to give anything away, just watch the film and see it play out. Just remember that it is Rachel's life you are watching unfolding.
An impeccable film held together by astonishing performances and a very understated direction. I don't know if I am biased because French is my first language, but I found the film so incredibly real. Even at the lengthy runtime, I barely felt it. Corsini is at the top of their career with this film!
I was certainly gripped by the set-up. Fine performances, nicely directed and stylish portrayal of events. My issue was with the sudden and what seemed to me, convenient/unearned simplistic ending. I simply did not 'buy' the ending. I agree with another user review which suggests we are simply presented with a 'one-note villain. Are we really to believe a Mother/woman who never responds vocally to a man such as Phillipe is a reliable narrator ? Is the Mother as innocent and worthy/decent as the character suggests? It has many strengths - but ultimately, it sloppy, rushed, convenient ending frustrated me and really had me wondering what exactly the director wants us to take away from this epic tale which covers 60 years.
The plot is overloaded with all sorts of personal, psychological, familial malfunctions. It ends up tiring you rather than entertain or make one think.
The development of the characters is a bit predictable even though they have many different hardships to undergo.
The acting is excellent without an exception and the aesthetics of the film is brilliant.
I'd say it's like a crush test for yourself to see how you'll react and what you think intuitively about all that's going on.
I saw this film in London yesterday and loved it. The story takes place in France in the late 50's. It is about love that is subverted by extreme
selfishness and class difference, about shifting attitudes and emotions and about reconciliation. Corsini's direction is understated, and the acting of all the leads is very convincing. The film is over two hours long and I wasn't bored for a second.
Did you know
- TriviaAdapted from Christine Angot's eponymous novel, the film is co-written by Catherine Corsini and Laurette Polmanss.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Entrée Libre: Episode dated 5 November 2018 (2018)
- How long is An Impossible Love?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official site
- Languages
- Also known as
- Olanaksız aşk
- Filming locations
- Oneglia, Imperia, Liguria, Italy(as French Riviera seaside town)
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Gross worldwide
- $2,025,113
- Runtime
- 2h 15m(135 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 2.35 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content