The Burnt Orange Heresy

The Burnt Orange Heresy isn't a film for the masses, but it's enjoyable enough. It's recommended viewing for those who enjoy independent cinema and who aren't offended by a little on-screen rumpy pumpy.

Take 4 Actors that are Talented, Eye-Pleasing, and Mysterious.

Put Them in Front of Interesting European Scenery.

Reciting Dialog that Intrigues, Stings, and Swells the Plot.

You may Not have a Masterpiece, but a Damn Good Art-World Scam that is Ripe for Soul Snatching and Fallen Angels.

An Art-Critic that "Talks about art better than he makes it".

Echoing the Standard "He who can't do teaches", makes a Living being a Con-Artist Lessoning and Pick-Pocketing Tourist in Italy.

He Dreams of an Opportunity to Really Cash-In.

Enter Wealthy, Aging, but Ageless Mick Jagger as a "Real" Mover and Shaker.

He Takes Advantage of the Porous, Pretentious People in the World of High-Priced Art Work.

A Man who is Not Interested in the Work but What the Work can Put in His Pocket.

The Critic has with Him a Beauty that has Done A Few Things and Seen a Few Things.

They Match Wits and Bodily Fluids.

She is also a Kind-Soul that Instantly Charms World Renowned Artist and Recluse, Donald Sutherland.

The Famous Painter Finds Her Equally Lovely.

They Hit it Off as Our Antagonist Art-Critic Schemes with Jagger to Get the Unwilling Artist to Give it Up for Posterity.

It's a Wordy Thriller Worthy of a Sit-Down and Appreciate and Old Story Painted with a Modern Eye.

I enjoyed The Burnt Orange Heresy film it looks very pretty and has some nice dialogue. All the cast were good and Mick Jagger was a surprise in that he played his part very well. Claes Bang seemed quite old for the part of a young and up and coming critic though.

The plot at times seemed a little strained. I read the Charles Willeford book a few years ago which possibly helped in following what was going on so far as what the characters motivations were. The film itself seems closer to something from the Tom Ripley novels than in does the book it is supposedly based on. It left out a key thing about Debney's career which everything should really hinge on, seems the script writer wanted to turn this into amost a European film noir than anything to do with the book. But it was an enjoyable hour and fourty minutes all the same.

The negative criticisms are understandable, if you are only looking for a drama that spoon feeds you an explanation each step of the way. There are only 4 characters and each is developed brilliantly. The best part is the development of what each character represents with their virtues and vices. Greed is demonstrated as a vice that comes in many forms, whether emotional, physical, mentally or monetarily, and it is clearly pervasive in three of the main characters. Like art, the characters are individually perceived differently by the viewer, as well as by each other. Like art, the movie "moves" the viewers to make a emotional connection to the characters and their motives. And finally, like art, every critic can be equally full of %^#.

Very good arty thriller... you have to stay with it till the end. Some reviewers on here are just the kinds of quasi critics who think their intelligence is beyond this film. But it's actually just the opposite. And it's those who are lost and simply can't see the movie for what it is.. great fun and thrilling for those who of course watch the entire film ...and understand it's Hitchcock-ian vibes. It's not for everyone. 'Sanctify yourselves'