Following the events at home, the Abbott family now face the terrors of the outside world. Forced to venture into the unknown, they realize the creatures that hunt by sound are not the only ... Read allFollowing the events at home, the Abbott family now face the terrors of the outside world. Forced to venture into the unknown, they realize the creatures that hunt by sound are not the only threats lurking beyond the sand path.Following the events at home, the Abbott family now face the terrors of the outside world. Forced to venture into the unknown, they realize the creatures that hunt by sound are not the only threats lurking beyond the sand path.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Nominated for 1 BAFTA Award
- 14 wins & 44 nominations total
Stefania Warwick
- Woman at Game
- (as Stefanie Warnick)
Alice Sophie Malyukova
- Girl at Marina
- (as Alice Malyukova)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
The good: The film in of itself, is well made - everything from cinematography to lighting, sound, action, pacing etc. Big props for that. And of course the acting from the leads (including the younger actors) is excellent. I also like the way the 'passing of the torch' is shot - clearly defined parallels are drawn that make it easy to see the directors vision.
The bad: Probably it's biggest criticism is just how close it is to the 1st part. Whilst containing less of what made the first one special. This film is definitely more action - so it's not a complete replica, but the story beats and plotting are basically the same - hide from aliens, get supplies, escape from or stop aliens, : rinse and repeat.
Should you watch it: If you like the first one, absolutely. It's a well constructed film that moves at a quick pace (almost over too quickly). A solid horror action flick. Recommended.
The bad: Probably it's biggest criticism is just how close it is to the 1st part. Whilst containing less of what made the first one special. This film is definitely more action - so it's not a complete replica, but the story beats and plotting are basically the same - hide from aliens, get supplies, escape from or stop aliens, : rinse and repeat.
Should you watch it: If you like the first one, absolutely. It's a well constructed film that moves at a quick pace (almost over too quickly). A solid horror action flick. Recommended.
I do not understand all the bad reviews.. I see a lot of reviews saying this one was the same as the first one, I don't see it that way. It was an extension of the first one. I also see people saying that the first one was bad and that this one is even worse. Why did you want to see this one if you didn't even like the first one? Than you probably didn't even give it a chance. I thought the movie was very thrilling. The first movie was different, this one had far more action in it. But I liked both of them equally. I saw it in theaters and was on the edge of my seat the whole movie. The acting was good, there were some nice details and it was very exciting. And yes, some characters did some stupid things, but those were things that fit the characters. If you have any empathy, you can imagine how the characters would feel and why they acted the way they did. I also really liked it that they gave an insight on how it had all begun.
This one picks up where the first one ended. There is a small backstory about the first day the creatures landed on earth. Director John Krasinski builds suspense through pacing, a slow buildup to when someone, as careful as they are, inevitably makes a loud noise that unleashes the slaughter. Krasinski likes to use wide angle shots of people running for their lives as the monsters fly into the frame. Silence is followed by a cacophony of screams.
We see more of the creatures this time, a sort of reptilian extraterrestrial concoction. Newcomer Cillian Murphy plays a survivalist who has lost everything. But the strength of the first A Quiet Place, as with the sequel, are the emotional, powerful performances from Emily Blunt, and her onscreen children, played by Millicent Simmonds and Noah Jupe. Simmonds especially, blends courage and compassion, garnering our support, so that she becomes the hero.
The ending leaves the door open to a third installment.
We see more of the creatures this time, a sort of reptilian extraterrestrial concoction. Newcomer Cillian Murphy plays a survivalist who has lost everything. But the strength of the first A Quiet Place, as with the sequel, are the emotional, powerful performances from Emily Blunt, and her onscreen children, played by Millicent Simmonds and Noah Jupe. Simmonds especially, blends courage and compassion, garnering our support, so that she becomes the hero.
The ending leaves the door open to a third installment.
Although AQPII is not bad, it does look like an attempt to cash in. There's a few problems with it and most of them are in the storyline. Here is an overall difference with the first film:
In the first one, there was a clear storyline, almost no plot holes, novelty and the right amount of tension.
In part 2 however , you kind of know exactly what is about to happen and that lessens the film experience.
For example, the tropes used in this film, are all the classics. Yes, they were used in the 1st film too, but at least then they were timed and deployed better, so the tension was nicely built and a sense of unpredictability was evident.
Now in part 2, I have a feeling that the story was a bit of a stretch. Also, the motives of the protagonists were at times unjustified, just to push the story forward.
So the story ends up with flaws, which disappoint mostly because of the predictability and the too many cliches. I would want to mention a few which I m sure many noticed but better not to spoil it. You will know once you see.
Also, it's not as quiet as the first film. Sound editing is great also in this one, but maybe there were more speech moments than needed.
Overall, the good parts: tension is there, cinematography is beautiful once again and we get to see some good acting.
I do hope that there's a part 3 and I hope they improve the story.
6,9/10.
In the first one, there was a clear storyline, almost no plot holes, novelty and the right amount of tension.
In part 2 however , you kind of know exactly what is about to happen and that lessens the film experience.
For example, the tropes used in this film, are all the classics. Yes, they were used in the 1st film too, but at least then they were timed and deployed better, so the tension was nicely built and a sense of unpredictability was evident.
Now in part 2, I have a feeling that the story was a bit of a stretch. Also, the motives of the protagonists were at times unjustified, just to push the story forward.
So the story ends up with flaws, which disappoint mostly because of the predictability and the too many cliches. I would want to mention a few which I m sure many noticed but better not to spoil it. You will know once you see.
Also, it's not as quiet as the first film. Sound editing is great also in this one, but maybe there were more speech moments than needed.
Overall, the good parts: tension is there, cinematography is beautiful once again and we get to see some good acting.
I do hope that there's a part 3 and I hope they improve the story.
6,9/10.
A good sequel, which is a rarity!
This one seemed slow at times, but the opening scene of Day 1 of the invasion, and the crazy intensity of everything at about the one-hour mark made for quite the stressful viewing, much like the original! Good ending too! I'm not clamoring for a third, but I'd watch it if they made it!
This one seemed slow at times, but the opening scene of Day 1 of the invasion, and the crazy intensity of everything at about the one-hour mark made for quite the stressful viewing, much like the original! Good ending too! I'm not clamoring for a third, but I'd watch it if they made it!
Did you know
- TriviaThe youngest of the Abbott family, son Beau is played by young actor Cade Woodward in the first film. In the opening flashback scenes of this second movie, Beau is played by Cade's younger brother Dean Woodward.
- GoofsThe turntable playing "Beyond The Sea" is equipment accurate for a radio station - a Technics SP-10 MKII. However, as part of the major plot point of a months long broadcast of a repeated song/signal, this model of turntable could not have been used as it is a manual turntable and has no automatic repeat function.
- Quotes
Evelyn Abbott: RUN!
- ConnectionsFeatured in Entertainment Tonight: Episode #39.157 (2020)
- SoundtracksBeyond the Sea
(La Mer)
Music by Charles Trenet
French lyrics by Charles Trenet
English lyrics by Jack Lawrence
Performed by Bobby Darin
Courtesy of Atlantic Recording Corp.
By arrangement with Warner Music Group Film & TV Licensing
- How long is A Quiet Place Part II?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Languages
- Also known as
- Un lugar en silencio: Parte II
- Filming locations
- Buffalo, New York, USA(Studio)
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $61,000,000 (estimated)
- Gross US & Canada
- $160,072,261
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $47,547,231
- May 30, 2021
- Gross worldwide
- $297,372,261
- Runtime
- 1h 37m(97 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content